Step length symmetry adaptation to split-belt treadmill walking after acquired non-traumatic transtibial amputation.
Gait symmetry
Gait training
Non-traumatic amputation
Transtibial
Journal
Gait & posture
ISSN: 1879-2219
Titre abrégé: Gait Posture
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9416830
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
07
10
2019
revised:
04
05
2020
accepted:
28
05
2020
pubmed:
10
6
2020
medline:
16
4
2021
entrez:
10
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Between-limb step length asymmetry is common following transtibial amputation (TTA) and contributes to negative health consequences. There are limited evidence-based interventions targeting reduced gait asymmetry for people with TTA. Split-belt treadmill walking with asymmetrical belt speeds has successfully reduced gait asymmetry in other patient populations. However, individuals with non-traumatic TTA have critical health-related impairments that may influence the ability to respond to split-belt treadmill walking. Do people with acquired, non-traumatic TTA adapt and retain a more symmetrical gait pattern in response to split-belt treadmill walking? Step length asymmetry was measured during split-belt treadmill walking. Eight participants walked under two alternating belt speed conditions: symmetrical (3 sets; Baseline, TIED1, TIED2) and asymmetrical belt speeds (5 sets; SPLIT1-5). One-way repeated-measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD tests were used to assess adaptation and short-term retention of step length symmetry. Adaptation was assessed as the level of asymmetry during TIED walking following repeated exposure to SPLIT walking. Retention was measured as the change in level of asymmetry during each set of SPLIT walking. Significant adaptation to split-belt walking was observed from late Baseline to early TIED1 and early TIED2. Between-limb step length asymmetry decreased from late Baseline (5.3 ± 3.4) to early TIED1 (-9.4 ± 3.6) and this change was sustained between early TIED1 and early TIED2 (-11.2 ± 3.1) (ANOVA F = 73.043, p < .001). Adaptations were retained as step length asymmetry decreased from early SPLIT1 (48.5 ± 5.3) to early SPLIT3 (31.4 ± 3.5) to early SPLIT5 (23.9 ± 5.1) (ANOVA F = 35.284, p < .001). Individuals with non-traumatic TTA are capable of gait adaptation to split-belt walking and short-term retention of adaptations after removal of the asymmetrical belt speeds. Adaptability of step length symmetry is possible without modification to the prosthetic limb. Split-belt walking should be tested as a potential intervention to help people with acquired, non-traumatic TTA increase between-limb step symmetry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Between-limb step length asymmetry is common following transtibial amputation (TTA) and contributes to negative health consequences. There are limited evidence-based interventions targeting reduced gait asymmetry for people with TTA. Split-belt treadmill walking with asymmetrical belt speeds has successfully reduced gait asymmetry in other patient populations. However, individuals with non-traumatic TTA have critical health-related impairments that may influence the ability to respond to split-belt treadmill walking.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Do people with acquired, non-traumatic TTA adapt and retain a more symmetrical gait pattern in response to split-belt treadmill walking?
METHODS
Step length asymmetry was measured during split-belt treadmill walking. Eight participants walked under two alternating belt speed conditions: symmetrical (3 sets; Baseline, TIED1, TIED2) and asymmetrical belt speeds (5 sets; SPLIT1-5). One-way repeated-measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD tests were used to assess adaptation and short-term retention of step length symmetry. Adaptation was assessed as the level of asymmetry during TIED walking following repeated exposure to SPLIT walking. Retention was measured as the change in level of asymmetry during each set of SPLIT walking.
RESULTS
Significant adaptation to split-belt walking was observed from late Baseline to early TIED1 and early TIED2. Between-limb step length asymmetry decreased from late Baseline (5.3 ± 3.4) to early TIED1 (-9.4 ± 3.6) and this change was sustained between early TIED1 and early TIED2 (-11.2 ± 3.1) (ANOVA F = 73.043, p < .001). Adaptations were retained as step length asymmetry decreased from early SPLIT1 (48.5 ± 5.3) to early SPLIT3 (31.4 ± 3.5) to early SPLIT5 (23.9 ± 5.1) (ANOVA F = 35.284, p < .001).
SIGNIFICANCE
Individuals with non-traumatic TTA are capable of gait adaptation to split-belt walking and short-term retention of adaptations after removal of the asymmetrical belt speeds. Adaptability of step length symmetry is possible without modification to the prosthetic limb. Split-belt walking should be tested as a potential intervention to help people with acquired, non-traumatic TTA increase between-limb step symmetry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32516682
pii: S0966-6362(20)30199-5
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.043
pmc: PMC7369240
mid: NIHMS1601757
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
162-167Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : TL1 TR002533
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002535
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Research reported in the publication was supported by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA [grant number TL1 TR002533 and UL1 TR002535] and the Foundation for Physical Therapy [Promotion of Doctoral Studies II]. The funding sources had no role in the design, execution, analysis, interpretation of the data, writing of the article, or decision to submit the article for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or the United States Government.
Références
Gait Posture. 2005 Dec;22(4):317-21
pubmed: 16274913
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Aug 1;6(8):269-278
pubmed: 28831330
Gait Posture. 2003 Feb;17(1):68-74
pubmed: 12535728
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Feb;21(1):110-4
pubmed: 2927295
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014 Feb;25(1):1-8
pubmed: 24287235
Phys Ther. 2014 Oct;94(10):1480-8
pubmed: 24903115
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8):1474-83
pubmed: 25917819
J Biomech. 2017 Feb 28;53:136-143
pubmed: 28126335
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan;90(1):74-81
pubmed: 19154832
Diabetes Care. 1994 Nov;17(11):1281-9
pubmed: 7821168
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;114(3):1705-12
pubmed: 26203114
Phys Ther. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):198-207
pubmed: 28204796
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):703-13
pubmed: 26522907
Int J Rehabil Res. 2013 Sep;36(3):275-83
pubmed: 23528389
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1130-6
pubmed: 26874230
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:5469-5472
pubmed: 28269495
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Sep;23(7):735-44
pubmed: 19307434
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):595-602
pubmed: 15878473
J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 19;31(42):15136-43
pubmed: 22016547
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1994 Aug;18(2):84-91
pubmed: 7991365
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1996 Aug;20(2):101-10
pubmed: 8876003
Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):934-9
pubmed: 23711987
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jun;27(5):460-8
pubmed: 23392918
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
pubmed: 16700627
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Aug;79(8):931-8
pubmed: 9710165
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2403-15
pubmed: 15958603
Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):631-4
pubmed: 22633017
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 12;12(7):e0181120
pubmed: 28704467
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;98(1):54-62
pubmed: 17507504