An Analysis of the Effects of Noisy Electrocardiogram Signal on Heartbeat Detection Performance.

ECG analysis ambulatory ECG signal cardiac monitoring heartbeat detection noisy signal

Journal

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2306-5354
Titre abrégé: Bioengineering (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101676056

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 22 04 2020
revised: 04 06 2020
accepted: 05 06 2020
entrez: 11 6 2020
pubmed: 11 6 2020
medline: 11 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Heartbeat detection for ambulatory cardiac monitoring is more challenging as the level of noise and artefacts induced by daily-life activities are considerably higher than monitoring in a hospital setting. It is valuable to understand the relationship between the characteristics of electrocardiogram (ECG) noises and the beat detection performance in the cardiac monitoring system. For this purpose, three well-known algorithms for the beat detection process were re-implemented. The beat detection algorithms were validated using two types of ambulatory datasets, which were the ECG signal from the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database and the simulated noise-contaminated ECG signal with different intensities of baseline wander (BW), muscle artefact (MA) and electrode motion (EM) artefact from the MIT-BIH Noise Stress Test Database. The findings showed that signals contaminated with noise and artefacts decreased the potential of beat detection in ambulatory signal with the poorest performance noted for ECG signal affected by the EM artefacts. In conclusion, none of the algorithms was able to detect all QRS complexes without any false detection at the highest level of noise. The EM noise influenced the beat detection performance the most in comparison to the MA and BW noises that resulted in the highest number of misdetections and false detections.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32517214
pii: bioengineering7020053
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering7020053
pmc: PMC7357458
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 12;17(1):
pubmed: 28085085
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995 Jan;42(1):21-8
pubmed: 7851927
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990 Jan;37(1):85-98
pubmed: 2303275
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2001 May-Jun;20(3):45-50
pubmed: 11446209
Circulation. 2003 Aug 5;108(5):e31-3
pubmed: 12900497
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Apr;127:144-64
pubmed: 26775139
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:5453-6
pubmed: 18003245
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 May 3;17(1):54
pubmed: 29720178
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207176
pubmed: 30457996
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 May;43(3):379-85
pubmed: 16035227
J Med Eng Technol. 2015 Feb;39(2):138-52
pubmed: 25641014
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 May;54(5):874-82
pubmed: 17518284
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Mar 19;18(1):27
pubmed: 30890182
Cardiol Res Pract. 2018 Feb 4;2018:2016282
pubmed: 29507812
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2002 Jan-Feb;21(1):42-57
pubmed: 11935987
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 May 20;2013:896056
pubmed: 23766720
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985 Mar;32(3):230-6
pubmed: 3997178

Auteurs

Ziti Fariha Mohd Apandi (ZFM)

Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, Mie 514-8507, Japan.

Ryojun Ikeura (R)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, Mie 514-8507, Japan.

Soichiro Hayakawa (S)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, Mie 514-8507, Japan.

Shigeyoshi Tsutsumi (S)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, Mie 514-8507, Japan.

Classifications MeSH