Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Adolescent
COVID-19
Caregivers
/ statistics & numerical data
Child
Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Coronavirus Infections
/ therapy
Female
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Male
Minority Groups
/ statistics & numerical data
Neurology
/ statistics & numerical data
Pandemics
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Satisfaction
Pediatrics
/ statistics & numerical data
Pneumonia, Viral
/ therapy
Retrospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Telemedicine
/ statistics & numerical data
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2020
accepted:
22
05
2020
pubmed:
11
6
2020
medline:
10
9
2020
entrez:
11
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the rapid implementation of child neurology telehealth outpatient care with the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020. This was a cohort study with retrospective comparison of 14,780 in-person encounters and 2,589 telehealth encounters, including 2,093 audio-video telemedicine and 496 scheduled telephone encounters, between October 1, 2019 and April 24, 2020. We compared in-person and telehealth encounters for patient demographics and diagnoses. For audio-video telemedicine encounters, we analyzed questionnaire responses addressing provider experience, follow-up plans, technical quality, need for in-person assessment, and parent/caregiver satisfaction. We performed manual reviews of encounters flagged as concerning by providers. There were no differences in patient age and major ICD-10 codes before and after transition. Clinicians considered telemedicine satisfactory in 93% (1,200 of 1,286) of encounters and suggested telemedicine as a component for follow-up care in 89% (1,144 of 1,286) of encounters. Technical challenges were reported in 40% (519 of 1,314) of encounters. In-person assessment was considered warranted after 5% (65 of 1,285) of encounters. Patients/caregivers indicated interest in telemedicine for future care in 86% (187 of 217) of encounters. Participation in telemedicine encounters compared to telephone encounters was less frequent among patients in racial or ethnic minority groups. We effectively converted most of our outpatient care to telehealth encounters, including mostly audio-video telemedicine encounters. Providers rated the vast majority of telemedicine encounters to be satisfactory, and only a small proportion of encounters required short-term in-person follow-up. These findings suggest that telemedicine is feasible and effective for a large proportion of child neurology care. Additional strategies are needed to ensure equitable telemedicine use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32518152
pii: WNL.0000000000010010
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010010
pmc: PMC7538222
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1257-e1266Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Epilepsia. 2005 May;46(5):767-70
pubmed: 15857445
MedGenMed. 2001 Mar 05;3(2):2
pubmed: 11549951
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199364
pubmed: 31418803
J Digit Imaging. 1997 Aug;10(3 Suppl 1):28
pubmed: 9268830
Health Econ. 2005 Jun;14(6):559-73
pubmed: 15497196
Neurol Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;9(4):314-321
pubmed: 31583186
Neurol Sci. 2013 Dec;34(12):2263-70
pubmed: 23430169
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Apr;25(4):274-278
pubmed: 30016207
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Sep;24(9):698-701
pubmed: 29303679
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Apr 13;18(5):26
pubmed: 29654523
Cureus. 2019 Apr 8;11(4):e4410
pubmed: 31205830
J Neurol. 2020 Feb;267(2):479-490
pubmed: 31680185
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Neurology. 2016 Sep 27;87(13):1344-51
pubmed: 27566746
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 30;18(5):e140
pubmed: 27241876
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679-1681
pubmed: 32160451