Determination of Clinical Parameters Sensitive to Functional Voice Disorders Applying Boosted Decision Stumps.
Parameters
boosted decision Stumps
classification
functional dysphonia
Journal
IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine
ISSN: 2168-2372
Titre abrégé: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623153
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
03
12
2019
revised:
21
02
2020
revised:
20
03
2020
accepted:
28
03
2020
entrez:
11
6
2020
pubmed:
11
6
2020
medline:
11
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Various voice assessment tools, such as questionnaires and aerodynamic voice characteristics, can be used to assess vocal function of individuals. However, not much is known about the best combinations of these parameters in identification of functional dysphonia in clinical settings. This study investigated six scores from clinically commonly used questionnaires and seven acoustic parameters. 514 females and 277 males were analyzed. The subjects were divided into three groups: one healthy group (N The questionnaire "Voice-related-quality-of-Life" and three objective parameters ("maximum fundamental frequency", "maximum Intensity" and "Jitter Percent") were sufficient to separate the groups (accuracy ranging from 0.690 (FD Results show that single parameters are insufficient to separate voice disorders but a set of several well-chosen parameters is. These findings will help to optimize and reduce clinical assessment time.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Various voice assessment tools, such as questionnaires and aerodynamic voice characteristics, can be used to assess vocal function of individuals. However, not much is known about the best combinations of these parameters in identification of functional dysphonia in clinical settings.
METHODS
METHODS
This study investigated six scores from clinically commonly used questionnaires and seven acoustic parameters. 514 females and 277 males were analyzed. The subjects were divided into three groups: one healthy group (N
RESULTS
RESULTS
The questionnaire "Voice-related-quality-of-Life" and three objective parameters ("maximum fundamental frequency", "maximum Intensity" and "Jitter Percent") were sufficient to separate the groups (accuracy ranging from 0.690 (FD
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Results show that single parameters are insufficient to separate voice disorders but a set of several well-chosen parameters is. These findings will help to optimize and reduce clinical assessment time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32518739
doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2020.2985026
pii: 2100511
pmc: PMC7274815
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2100511Références
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Apr;42(2):355-66
pubmed: 10229452
HNO. 2006 Oct;54(10):793-802
pubmed: 16132879
J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Feb;39(1):126-34
pubmed: 8820704
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
J Speech Hear Res. 1987 Jun;30(2):252-60
pubmed: 3599957
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Aug;267(8):1261-71
pubmed: 20567980
Artif Intell Med. 2010 May;49(1):51-9
pubmed: 20138486
J Ultrasound Med. 1999 Oct;18(10):673-82
pubmed: 10511299
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2006;31(2):51-6
pubmed: 16754276
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 03;15(8):
pubmed: 30081497
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):62-88
pubmed: 28030869
Oncol Res Treat. 2015;38(4):154-9
pubmed: 25877938
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Jun;43(3):796-809
pubmed: 10877446
J Gerontol. 1980 Mar;35(2):194-8
pubmed: 7410776
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan - Feb;85(1):50-54
pubmed: 29174584
HNO. 2005 Oct;53(10):895-900, 902-4
pubmed: 15580457
J Voice. 2009 Mar;23(2):175-81
pubmed: 18313896
J Voice. 2018 May;32(3):385.e17-385.e25
pubmed: 28533075
BMJ. 1995 Oct 21;311(7012):1039-40
pubmed: 7580648
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71
pubmed: 23638278
J Biomech. 2006;39(2):369-74
pubmed: 16321641
Laryngoscope. 2018 Oct;128(10):2367-2374
pubmed: 29536548
J Voice. 2013 May;27(3):361-8
pubmed: 23465526
J Voice. 2019 Sep;33(5):811.e1-811.e12
pubmed: 29861291
J Voice. 2005 Jun;19(2):268-82
pubmed: 15907441
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Feb;21(1):3-15
pubmed: 22049403
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 11;173(5):375-7
pubmed: 23358680
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Jun;42(3):183-8
pubmed: 25440411
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Feb;258(2):77-82
pubmed: 11307610
Artif Intell Med. 2016 Jan;66:15-28
pubmed: 26597002
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb;133(2):EL82-7
pubmed: 23363198
J Speech Hear Disord. 1974 Aug;39(3):286-97
pubmed: 4415856
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Aug;57(4):1148-61
pubmed: 24686496
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4575437
pubmed: 27990428
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jun;11(3):144-8
pubmed: 12923352
J Voice. 2001 Dec;15(4):529-42
pubmed: 11792029
J Voice. 1995 Dec;9(4):383-93
pubmed: 8574304
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jan 22;61(1):1-24
pubmed: 29222538
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Feb;146(2):234-9
pubmed: 22075074
Arch Otolaryngol. 1980 Mar;106(3):149-50
pubmed: 7356434
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):209-215
pubmed: 28732751
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Sep;260(8):412-7
pubmed: 12690514
J Voice. 2011 Sep;25(5):576-90
pubmed: 20728308
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Aug;54(4):1011-21
pubmed: 21173391
J Voice. 1999 Dec;13(4):557-69
pubmed: 10622521
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):449-454
pubmed: 29392597