Chest X-ray in new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: findings and correlation with clinical outcome.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnostic imaging
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Italy
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiography, Thoracic
Retrospective Studies
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity and Specificity
COVID-19
Chest radiography
Coronavirus
Diagnostic imaging
Infection
Journal
La Radiologia medica
ISSN: 1826-6983
Titre abrégé: Radiol Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0177625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
05
05
2020
accepted:
25
05
2020
pubmed:
11
6
2020
medline:
10
7
2020
entrez:
11
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to describe the main chest radiological features (CXR) of COVID-19 and correlate them with clinical outcome. This is a retrospective study involving patients with clinical-epidemiological suspect of COVID-19 infection, who performed CXRs at the emergency department (ED) of our University Hospital from March 1 to March 31, 2020. All patients performed RT-PCR nasopharyngeal and throat swab, CXR at the ED and clinical-epidemiological data. RT-PCR results were considered the reference standard. The final outcome was expressed as discharged or hospitalized patients into a medicine department or intensive care unit (ICU). Patients that had a RT-PCR positive for COVID-19 infection were 234 in total: 153 males (65.4%) and 81 females (34.6%), with a mean age of 66.04 years (range 18-97 years). Thirteen CXRs were negative for radiological thoracic involvement (5.6%). The following alterations were more commonly observed: 135 patients with lung consolidations (57.7%), 147 (62.8%) with GGO, 55 (23.5%) with nodules and 156 (66.6%) with reticular-nodular opacities. Patients with consolidations and GGO coexistent in the same radiography were 35.5% of total. Peripheral (57.7%) and lower zone distribution (58.5%) were the most common predominance. Moreover, bilateral involvement (69.2%) was most frequent than unilateral one. Baseline CXR sensitivity in our experience is about 67.1%. The most affected patients were especially males in the age group 60-79 years old (45.95%, of which 71.57% males). RALE score was slightly higher in male than in female patients. ANOVA with Games-Howell post hoc showed significant differences of RALE scores for group 1 vs 3 (p < 0.001) and 2 vs 3 (p = 0.001). Inter-reader agreement in assigning RALE score was very good (ICC: 0.92-with 95% confidence interval 0.88-0.95). In COVID-19, CXR shows patchy or diffuse reticular-nodular opacities and consolidation, with basal, peripheral and bilateral predominance. In our experience, baseline CXR had a sensitivity of 68.1%. The RALE score can be used in the emergency setting as a quantitative method of the extent of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, correlating with an increased risk of ICU admission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32519256
doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01232-9
pii: 10.1007/s11547-020-01232-9
pmc: PMC7282464
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
730-737Références
J Med Syst. 2020 Mar 18;44(5):93
pubmed: 32189081
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E72-E78
pubmed: 32216717
Radiol Med. 2020 Apr;125(4):337-338
pubmed: 32232651
Thorax. 2018 Sep;73(9):840-846
pubmed: 29903755
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):697-722
pubmed: 18195376
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Apr 06;2(2):e204001
pubmed: 33779627
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1287-1294
pubmed: 32134681
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4874-4882
pubmed: 32296940
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473
pubmed: 31986257
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):172-180
pubmed: 32255413
Radiol Med. 2020 May;125(5):514-516
pubmed: 32350796
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Radiol Med. 2020 May;125(5):505-508
pubmed: 32350794
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E65-E71
pubmed: 32191588
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E115-E117
pubmed: 32073353