Oncological outcomes of salvage cryotherapy after primary radiation therapy vs. primary cryotherapy: 10-year experience at a large Canadian referral center.


Journal

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 11 6 2020
medline: 11 6 2020
entrez: 11 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Salvage cryotherapy is a guideline-recommended treatment of localized prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy. There is little published evidence analyzing the outcomes of salvage cryotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer following different primary therapy energy modalities. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who received whole gland salvage cryotherapy from 2007-2017 at a large tertiary referral center after either primary radiation therapy (RT) or primary whole gland cryotherapy. Primary outcome was biochemical failure, defined as per the Phoenix criteria (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] nadir + 2.0 ng/ml). Secondary outcomes included time to biochemical failure and development of metastatic disease. Fifty-eight of 391 patients who received cryotherapy were identified as having received salvage cryotherapy (after RT, n=37; after primary cryotherapy, n=21). Biochemical recurrence occurred in 21 (57%) patients with previous RT and in 17 (81%) patients with previous cryotherapy (p=0.001). Median time to biochemical recurrence was 18 months for patients with previous RT and 13 months for patients with previous cryotherapy (p=0.002). The biochemical-free survival rate for primary radiation therapy patients was 71% at two years compared to 23% at two years for patients who underwent primary cryotherapy (p<0.01). There was no difference in the development of metastatic disease between groups (19% vs. 18%, cryo vs. radiation, p=0.34). These results suggest that salvage cryotherapy may offer more durable oncological control to patients after radiation compared to primary cryotherapy, with a lower rate and longer duration before biochemical recurrence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32520707
pii: cuaj.6244
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6244
pmc: PMC7673828
doi:

Types de publication

Letter

Langues

eng

Pagination

E604-E606

Références

Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Jun;12(3):209-15
pubmed: 21394596
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jul;23(3):222-34
pubmed: 23763889
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1204-11
pubmed: 22421081
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):1-7
pubmed: 22840351
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):E256-61
pubmed: 23469778
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):76-86
pubmed: 18789572
Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Jun;3(3 Suppl 2):S92-S100
pubmed: 19543427
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec 21;13:340
pubmed: 26691335

Auteurs

Alexandra Bain (A)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Adam Kinnaird (A)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Ryan McLarty (R)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan (A)

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Gerald Todd (G)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Michael P Chetner (MP)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Classifications MeSH