Trends and Between-Physician Variation in Laboratory Testing: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in General Practice.
general practice
intraclass correlation coefficient
laboratory testing
mixed-effect model
trend
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jun 2020
08 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
18
05
2020
revised:
05
06
2020
accepted:
05
06
2020
entrez:
12
6
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
12
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Laboratory tests are frequently ordered by general practitioners (GPs), but little is known about time trends and between-GP variation of their use. In this retrospective longitudinal study, we analyzed over six million consultations by Swiss GPs during the decade 2009-2018. For 15 commonly used test types, we defined specific laboratory testing rates (sLTR) as the percentage of consultations involving corresponding laboratory testing requests. Patient age- and sex-adjusted time trends of sLTR were modeled with mixed-effect logistic regression accounting for clustering of patients within GPs. We quantified between-GP variation by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Nine out of the 15 laboratory test types considered showed significant temporal increases, most eminently vitamin D (ten-year odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.06) and glycated hemoglobin (ten-year OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.82-1.92). Test types both subject to substantial increase and high between-GP variation of sLTR were vitamin D (ICC 0.075), glycated hemoglobin (ICC 0.101), C-reactive protein (ICC 0.202), and vitamin B12 (ICC 0.166). Increasing testing frequencies and large between-GP variation of specific test type use pointed at inconsistencies of medical practice and potential overuse.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32521786
pii: jcm9061787
doi: 10.3390/jcm9061787
pmc: PMC7355885
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Dec;52(485):974-80
pubmed: 12528582
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 22;10(1):6840
pubmed: 32321977
Health Rep. 2007 Feb;18(1):23-35
pubmed: 17441441
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul;469(7):1900-5
pubmed: 21264553
Can Fam Physician. 2013 May;59(5):e240-5
pubmed: 23673604
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Nov;84(11):920-32
pubmed: 26296433
Eur J Haematol. 2016 Dec;97(6):583-593
pubmed: 27155295
London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2015;7(2):15-22
pubmed: 26217398
Circulation. 2005 Feb 1;111(4):499-510
pubmed: 15687140
BMJ. 2011 Mar 17;342:d1513
pubmed: 21415111
Can Fam Physician. 1988 Feb;34:327-31
pubmed: 21253047
BMJ. 2015 Dec 08;351:h6138
pubmed: 26646052
Clin Biochem. 2018 Sep;59:56-61
pubmed: 30026017
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43
pubmed: 22579043
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1327-34
pubmed: 19502545
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913325
pubmed: 31617925
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Jun;18(3):196-200
pubmed: 29858427
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4666
pubmed: 30487169
Clin Chem. 1996 May;42(5):813-6
pubmed: 8653920
Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):297-309
pubmed: 7218895
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 May;57(538):377-82
pubmed: 17504588
Fam Pract. 1992 Mar;9(1):22-7
pubmed: 1634022
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227280
pubmed: 31891635
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 31;17:38
pubmed: 27036116
Circulation. 2011 Nov 8;124(19):2145-54
pubmed: 22064958
JAMA. 2012 Sep 12;308(10):998-1006
pubmed: 22928184
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):268-74
pubmed: 24610189
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94
pubmed: 15485730
Br Med Bull. 2011;99:39-51
pubmed: 21893493
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 May;54(5):791-8
pubmed: 26466168
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Oct;497:1-5
pubmed: 31228416
Med Decis Making. 1998 Jan-Mar;18(1):19-28
pubmed: 9456202
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 20;16(1):229
pubmed: 30567539
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Jan 1;427:142-4
pubmed: 24084502
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 11;8(2):e018557
pubmed: 29440142