Single bundle ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon graft: 2-years follow-up.
ACL
ACL reconstruction
Functional score
Peroneus longus
Thigh circumference
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
21
03
2019
accepted:
03
09
2019
entrez:
12
6
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
12
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Peroneus longus tendon autograft resembles hamstring tendon's biomechanical strength. Thus, peroneus longus is a potential graft in reconstructive orthopaedic procedures. However, there was few study in evaluation of peroneus longus usage in ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to quantify the clinical outcome and donor site morbidity in ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft. Patients who suffered isolated ACL injury were enrolled and underwent isolated single bundle ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus autograft. Functional score (IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score) were assessed at pre-operative and 2-years after surgery. Graft diameter was measured intraoperative. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurement and ankle scoring using AOFAS and FADI. We also measured serial hop test. Seventy-five patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Peroneus longus graft diameter was 8.38 ± 0.68 mm. There was significant difference between pre and 2-years post-operative functional score in IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score. Mean of AOFAS was 98.93 ± 3.10 and FADI was 99.79 ± 0.59 with no significant decrease of thigh circumference, and good serial hop test result. ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft has excellent functional score in IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, Tegner-Lysholm score at 2-years follow up with the advantages of greater graft diameter, less thigh hypotrophy, good serial hop test result, and excellent ankle function based on AOFAS and FADI score. Level 2, Prospective Cohort Study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Peroneus longus tendon autograft resembles hamstring tendon's biomechanical strength. Thus, peroneus longus is a potential graft in reconstructive orthopaedic procedures. However, there was few study in evaluation of peroneus longus usage in ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to quantify the clinical outcome and donor site morbidity in ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients who suffered isolated ACL injury were enrolled and underwent isolated single bundle ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus autograft. Functional score (IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score) were assessed at pre-operative and 2-years after surgery. Graft diameter was measured intraoperative. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurement and ankle scoring using AOFAS and FADI. We also measured serial hop test.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seventy-five patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Peroneus longus graft diameter was 8.38 ± 0.68 mm. There was significant difference between pre and 2-years post-operative functional score in IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score. Mean of AOFAS was 98.93 ± 3.10 and FADI was 99.79 ± 0.59 with no significant decrease of thigh circumference, and good serial hop test result.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft has excellent functional score in IKDC, Modified Cincinnati, Tegner-Lysholm score at 2-years follow up with the advantages of greater graft diameter, less thigh hypotrophy, good serial hop test result, and excellent ankle function based on AOFAS and FADI score.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Level 2, Prospective Cohort Study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32523289
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.09.004
pii: S0976-5662(19)30224-3
pmc: PMC7275277
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S332-S336Informations de copyright
© 2019 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jul 17;95(14):1271-7
pubmed: 23864175
Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):2-11
pubmed: 12531750
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1948-53
pubmed: 24140144
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Jan;19(1):7-11
pubmed: 25683732
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 07;(9):CD005960
pubmed: 21901700
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):555-60
pubmed: 26219159
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):225-32
pubmed: 14960665
Arthroscopy. 2014 Jul;30(7):882-90
pubmed: 24951356
Sports Health. 2011 Jan;3(1):73-81
pubmed: 23015994
Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Apr;25(4):242-6
pubmed: 15132932
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008 Jan-Feb;42(1):38-43
pubmed: 18354276
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016 Apr 26;4:21-26
pubmed: 29264259
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Sep;31(9):781-9
pubmed: 20880481