A prospective study of two methods of analgesia in shoulder arthroscopic procedures as day case surgery.
Analgesia
Day case surgery
Interscalene block
Intra-articular
Local anaesthesia
Shoulder arthroscopy
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
20
01
2019
revised:
08
06
2019
accepted:
08
06
2019
entrez:
12
6
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
12
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recent advances in anaesthesia and analgesia have significantly improved the early recovery and effective post-operative pain control in day care surgery e.g. shoulder arthroscopic procedures. Adequate analgesia improves the early rehabilitation for a better outcome. We prospectively evaluated the post-operative pain relief following the two methods of analgesia i.e. regional Inter-scalene block (ISB) vs Intra-articular (IA) injection using 0.5% Chirocaine in various therapeutic arthroscopic shoulder procedures. A prospective comparative study was performed on a group of 105 patients (ASA grade I or II) who underwent the following procedures at two different hospitals: diagnostic arthroscopy, subacromial decompression (SAD) alone, SAD in combination with mini open cuff repairs or distal clavicle excision, anterior stabilization (Bankart's repair) and inferior capsular shift. A successful Inter-scalene block (0.5% Chirocaine-30mls) preceded the general anaesthesia (Group 1-52 patients). Local intra-articular infiltration (0.5% Chirocaine - 20 mls) was given postoperatively (Group 2-53 patients). Post operatively visual analogue scores (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) were assessed in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), at 4hrs, at 24hrs and at 48 h. The amount of morphine consumption for the first 2 days after surgery was recorded. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups at both the hospitals. The median postoperative pain score of VAS <3 was observed in both groups. Significant difference (p < 0.0001) was observed in the VAS scores between the two groups at all the time intervals. The mean length of adequate sensory block in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 [20.5 h: 4.2 h] (p < 0.001). The mean analgesic (morphine) consumption was lower in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 [4.6 mg/24 h: 18.8mg/24 h](p < 0.0001). Bone shaving procedures e.g. SAD, SAD + Rotator Cuff repair, SAD + Lateral clavicular excision required significantly higher analgesia in both groups compared to the soft tissue procedures. Single dose ISB provided longer and effective postoperative analgesia. The bone shaving procedures required more analgesia in IA Group as compared to ISB Group.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
The recent advances in anaesthesia and analgesia have significantly improved the early recovery and effective post-operative pain control in day care surgery e.g. shoulder arthroscopic procedures. Adequate analgesia improves the early rehabilitation for a better outcome. We prospectively evaluated the post-operative pain relief following the two methods of analgesia i.e. regional Inter-scalene block (ISB) vs Intra-articular (IA) injection using 0.5% Chirocaine in various therapeutic arthroscopic shoulder procedures.
METHODS
METHODS
A prospective comparative study was performed on a group of 105 patients (ASA grade I or II) who underwent the following procedures at two different hospitals: diagnostic arthroscopy, subacromial decompression (SAD) alone, SAD in combination with mini open cuff repairs or distal clavicle excision, anterior stabilization (Bankart's repair) and inferior capsular shift. A successful Inter-scalene block (0.5% Chirocaine-30mls) preceded the general anaesthesia (Group 1-52 patients). Local intra-articular infiltration (0.5% Chirocaine - 20 mls) was given postoperatively (Group 2-53 patients). Post operatively visual analogue scores (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) were assessed in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), at 4hrs, at 24hrs and at 48 h. The amount of morphine consumption for the first 2 days after surgery was recorded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Patient characteristics were similar in both groups at both the hospitals. The median postoperative pain score of VAS <3 was observed in both groups. Significant difference (p < 0.0001) was observed in the VAS scores between the two groups at all the time intervals. The mean length of adequate sensory block in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 [20.5 h: 4.2 h] (p < 0.001). The mean analgesic (morphine) consumption was lower in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 [4.6 mg/24 h: 18.8mg/24 h](p < 0.0001). Bone shaving procedures e.g. SAD, SAD + Rotator Cuff repair, SAD + Lateral clavicular excision required significantly higher analgesia in both groups compared to the soft tissue procedures.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Single dose ISB provided longer and effective postoperative analgesia. The bone shaving procedures required more analgesia in IA Group as compared to ISB Group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32523295
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.06.008
pii: S0976-5662(19)30076-1
pmc: PMC7275286
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S368-S371Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 May;84(5):775-9
pubmed: 12004020
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2001 Jul-Aug;5(4):143-6
pubmed: 12067083
Arthroscopy. 2005 Aug;21(8):1015
pubmed: 16086570
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Sep;46(8):1031-6
pubmed: 12190808
Anesth Analg. 2001 Sep;93(3):601-5
pubmed: 11524326
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):22-4
pubmed: 8020220
Anesthesiology. 2001 Oct;95(4):875-80
pubmed: 11605927
Anesthesiology. 2002 Jun;96(6):1290-6
pubmed: 12170038
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Sep;47(8):993-1000
pubmed: 12904192
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Mar;92(3):414-5
pubmed: 14742335
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):424-32
pubmed: 14556133
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:971963
pubmed: 22792099
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(37):e4921
pubmed: 27631270
Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):589-92, table of contents
pubmed: 15271745
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Sep;(390):10-6
pubmed: 11550855
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Jun;16(2):211-25
pubmed: 12491553
Arthroscopy. 1993;9(3):295-300
pubmed: 8323615
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):974-9
pubmed: 15866958
Arthroscopy. 2002 May-Jun;18(5):464-8
pubmed: 11987055
Anesth Analg. 1970 May-Jun;49(3):455-66
pubmed: 5534420
Anesth Analg. 1997 Jun;84(6):1306-12
pubmed: 9174311