Incorrect sleeping position and eye rubbing in patients with unilateral or highly asymmetric keratoconus: a case-control study.
Asymmetric keratoconus
Case-control
Eye rubbing
Risk factors
Sleeping position
Unilateral keratoconus
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
16
02
2020
accepted:
25
05
2020
revised:
19
05
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
12
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate eye rubbing and sleeping position in patients with Unilateral or Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus (UHAKC). Case-control study of consecutive UHAKC patients diagnosed at the Rothschild Foundation. Controls were age- and sex-matched, randomly selected refractive surgery clinic patients. Patients self-administered questionnaires regarding their family history of keratoconus, eye rubbing, and sleeping habits. All the eyes underwent a comprehensive ocular examination. Logistic regression was used to analyze univariate and multivariate data to identify risk factors for keratoconus. Thirty-three UHAKC patients and 64 controls were included. Univariate analyses showed that daytime eye rubbing [OR = 172.78], in the morning [OR = 24.3], or in eyes with the steepest keratometry [OR = 21.7] were significantly different between groups. Allergy [OR = 2.94], red eyes in the morning [OR = 6.36], and sleeping on stomach/sides [OR = 14.31] or on the same side as the steepest keratometry [OR = 94.72] were also significantly different. The multivariate model also showed statistical significance for most factors including daytime eye rubbing [OR = 134.96], in the morning [OR = 24.86], in the steepest eye [OR = 27.56], and sleeping on stomach/sides [OR = 65.02] or on the steepest side [OR = 144.02]. A univariate analysis in UHAKC group, comparing the worse and better eye, showed that eye rubbing [OR = 162.14] and sleeping position [OR = 99.74] were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with the worse eye. Our data suggests that vigorous eye rubbing and incorrect sleeping position are associated with UHAKC. This is especially true in rubbing the most afflicted eye, and contributory sleep position, including positions placing pressure on the eye with the steepest keratometry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32524239
doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04771-z
pii: 10.1007/s00417-020-04771-z
pmc: PMC7584543
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2431-2439Références
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 May;90(5):448-54
pubmed: 23584486
Cornea. 2012 Jun;31(6):600-3
pubmed: 22495032
Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Dec 15;106(6):757-8
pubmed: 3195666
Cornea. 2013 Sep;32(9):1232-6
pubmed: 23471083
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995 May;23(2):129-33
pubmed: 7546688
Am J Med Genet. 2000 Aug 28;93(5):403-9
pubmed: 10951465
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;29(6):345-51
pubmed: 11778802
Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar 15;101(3):267-73
pubmed: 3513592
J Refract Surg. 2016 Aug 1;32(8):510-6
pubmed: 27505311
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2012 Spring;1(1):14-7
pubmed: 24600612
Cornea. 2006 Jun;25(5):603-10
pubmed: 16783151
Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Dec;61(12):761-4
pubmed: 603783
Cornea. 2004 Aug;23(6):539-40
pubmed: 15256988
Cornea. 2009 Jul;28(6):607-15
pubmed: 19512912
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 14;8(3):558-561
pubmed: 29422858
Cornea. 2003 Mar;22(2):122-5
pubmed: 12605045
Cornea. 2000 Jul;19(4):567-9
pubmed: 10928781
Cornea. 2018 Apr;37(4):470-473
pubmed: 29319596
Clin Exp Optom. 2003 Nov;86(6):376-84
pubmed: 14632614
Cornea. 2008 Sep;27(8):923-9
pubmed: 18724155
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;29(6):340-4
pubmed: 11778801
Eye (Lond). 2014 Feb;28(2):189-95
pubmed: 24357835
Cornea. 2002 Mar;21(2):206-9
pubmed: 11862097
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2016 Nov;22(6):595-601
pubmed: 27635626
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;89(11):1403-6
pubmed: 16234439
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;139(2):356-7
pubmed: 15734005
Cornea. 2004 Aug;23(6):560-4
pubmed: 15256993
Ophthalmology. 1997 Sep;104(9):1409-13
pubmed: 9307634
Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Apr;97(4):527-8
pubmed: 6720826
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Jun;38(3):199-205
pubmed: 25707930
Cornea. 2012 Jun;31(6):595-9
pubmed: 22333661
Can J Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;46(1):83-6
pubmed: 21283164
Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;16(4):607-20, vii
pubmed: 14741001
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;84(8):834-6
pubmed: 10906086
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1539-48
pubmed: 23935360
Exp Eye Res. 1996 Apr;62(4):325-7
pubmed: 8795451
J Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;27(10):753-8
pubmed: 21800785
Surv Ophthalmol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(4):297-319
pubmed: 9493273
Exp Eye Res. 2007 Jun;84(6):1125-34
pubmed: 17449031
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Jan;35(1):23-9
pubmed: 21715046
Cornea. 2020 Jun;39(6):697-701
pubmed: 32040008
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;99(12):1675-9
pubmed: 26137990
Cornea. 2015 Apr;34(4):359-69
pubmed: 25738235
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;40(9):1558-60
pubmed: 25135549
Eye Contact Lens. 2014 Nov;40(6):326-30
pubmed: 25320954
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;11(3):319-22
pubmed: 27621792
Cornea. 2017 Nov;36(11):1316-1324
pubmed: 28742621
Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):831-8
pubmed: 20097427
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 Nov;35(6):673-81
pubmed: 26286678
Eye (Lond). 2008 Apr;22(4):534-41
pubmed: 17237755