A brief history of risk.
Content analysis
Danger
Ngram Corpus
Public discourse
Risk
Topic model
Journal
Cognition
ISSN: 1873-7838
Titre abrégé: Cognition
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0367541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
28
10
2019
revised:
13
05
2020
accepted:
27
05
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
12
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite increasing life expectancy and high levels of welfare, health care, and public safety in most post-industrial countries, the public discourse often revolves around perceived threats. Terrorism, global pandemics, and environmental catastrophes are just a few of the risks that dominate media coverage. Is this public discourse on risk disconnected from reality? To examine this issue, we analyzed the dynamics of the risk discourse in two natural language text corpora. Specifically, we tracked latent semantic patterns over a period of 150 years to address four questions: First, we examined how the frequency of the word risk has changed over historical time. Is the construct of risk playing an ever-increasing role in the public discourse, as the sociological notion of a 'risk society' suggests? Second, we investigated how the sentiments for the words co-occurring with risk have changed. Are the connotations of risk becoming increasingly ominous? Third, how has the meaning of risk changed relative to close associates such as danger and hazard? Is risk more subject to semantic change? Finally, we decompose the construct of risk into the specific topics with which it has been associated and track those topics over historical time. This brief history of the semantics of risk reveals new and surprising insights-a fourfold increase in frequency, increasingly negative sentiment, a semantic drift toward forecasting and prevention, and a shift away from war toward chronic disease-reflecting the conceptual evolution of risk in the archeological records of public discourse.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32526519
pii: S0010-0277(20)30163-3
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104344
pmc: PMC7278655
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104344Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:87-92
pubmed: 26117487
Risk Anal. 2018 Oct;38(10):2193-2207
pubmed: 29813185
Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):431-40
pubmed: 22329683
Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):280-5
pubmed: 3563507
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Oct;143(5):2000-19
pubmed: 24979239
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):323-330
pubmed: 30496691
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3552
pubmed: 18958167
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Oct;75(4):887-900
pubmed: 9825526
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 5;112(18):5631-6
pubmed: 25902519
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Dec;3(12):1271-1275
pubmed: 31611658
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40181
pubmed: 22808113
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1191-207
pubmed: 23404613
Psychol Sci. 2012 Dec;23(12):1449-54
pubmed: 23160203
Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1029-31
pubmed: 12004104
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1722-31
pubmed: 23925305
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 07;10(10):e0137041
pubmed: 26445406
Science. 2011 Jan 14;331(6014):176-82
pubmed: 21163965
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1864-1877
pubmed: 30746643