Exploring the accuracy of isotopic analyses in atom probe mass spectrometry.
Atom probe
Isotopic analysis
Mass spectrometry
Multi-hit detection events
Peak fitting
Journal
Ultramicroscopy
ISSN: 1879-2723
Titre abrégé: Ultramicroscopy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7513702
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
09
01
2020
revised:
30
04
2020
accepted:
02
05
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
12
6
2020
entrez:
12
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Atom probe tomography (APT) can theoretically deliver accurate chemical and isotopic analyses at a high level of sensitivity, precision, and spatial resolution. However, empirical APT data often contain significant biases that lead to erroneous chemical concentration and isotopic abundance measurements. The present study explores the accuracy of quantitative isotopic analyses performed via atom probe mass spectrometry. A machine learning-based adaptive peak fitting algorithm was developed to provide a reproducible and mathematically defensible means to determine peak shapes and intensities in the mass spectrum for specific ion species. The isotopic abundance measurements made with the atom probe are compared directly with the known isotopic abundance values for each of the materials. Even in the presence of exceedingly high numbers of multi-hit detection events (up to 80%), and in the absence of any deadtime corrections, our approach produced isotopic abundance measurements having an accuracy consistent with values limited predominantly by counting statistics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32526558
pii: S0304-3991(20)30005-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113018
pmc: PMC7717065
mid: NIHMS1642328
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113018Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIST DOC
ID : 9999-NIST
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
ACS Nano. 2012 May 22;6(5):3898-906
pubmed: 22515737
Ultramicroscopy. 2005 Mar;102(4):287-98
pubmed: 15694675
J Phys Chem Lett. 2013 Mar 21;4(6):993-8
pubmed: 26291366
Ultramicroscopy. 2015 Dec;159 Pt 2:324-37
pubmed: 26095825
Ultramicroscopy. 2018 Jun;189:54-60
pubmed: 29614395
Ultramicroscopy. 2010 Jun;110(7):836-43
pubmed: 20417033
Ultramicroscopy. 2013 Sep;132:81-5
pubmed: 23294556
Micron. 2016 Jan;80:83-9
pubmed: 26519815
Ultramicroscopy. 2015 Dec;159 Pt 2:338-45
pubmed: 25791795
Microsc Microanal. 2017 Apr;23(2):300-306
pubmed: 28300014
Ultramicroscopy. 2007 Feb-Mar;107(2-3):131-9
pubmed: 16938398
Ultramicroscopy. 2015 Dec;159 Pt 1:101-11
pubmed: 26342554
Ultramicroscopy. 2011 May;111(6):480-6
pubmed: 21163577
J Environ Radioact. 2016 Mar;153:206-213
pubmed: 26774651
Ultramicroscopy. 2013 Sep;132:60-4
pubmed: 23607992
Ultramicroscopy. 2014 Dec;147:51-60
pubmed: 25048825
Ultramicroscopy. 2015 Dec;159 Pt 2:248-54
pubmed: 26095824