Color match of high translucency monolithic zirconia restorations with different thicknesses and backgrounds.
ceramic
color
spectrophotometry
substrate
zirconia
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
19
02
2020
revised:
19
04
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
pubmed:
13
6
2020
medline:
29
8
2020
entrez:
13
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the effects of ceramic thickness and background type on the color match of high translucency monolithic zirconia restorations. Fifty A2 shade high translucency zirconia disk specimens with five different thicknesses (0.7, 0.9, 1.1, 1.4, 1.6 mm) were placed on 12 backgrounds: A1, A2, A3, A3.5, B1, and B2 shade composite resin, A3 shade zirconia, nonprecious gold-colored alloy, nickel-chromium alloy, amalgam, and A2 and A3 shade tooth. Color measurements were performed to determine the specimens' CIELab values. CIEDE2000 formula was used to determine ΔE Mean ΔE High translucency monolithic zirconia restorations with a minimum thickness of 1.1 mm on tooth backgrounds could create acceptable color matches; however, with other backgrounds tested, they could not. Ceramic thickness and background type affect the color of high translucency monolithic zirconia restorations. A minimum zirconia thickness of 1.1 mm and normal color tooth structures, as a background, are essential for achieving the acceptable color match of these restorations.
Substances chimiques
Dental Porcelain
12001-21-7
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
615-621Subventions
Organisme : Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
ID : 12953
Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Pustina-Krasniqi T, Xhajanka E, Ajeti N, Bicaj T, Dula L, Lila Z. The relationship between tooth color, skin and eye color. Eur Oral Res. 2018;52:50-55.
Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, et al. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:134.
Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE, et al. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:132-137.
Zhang F, Reveron H, Spies BC, van Meerbeek B, Chevalier J. Trade-off between fracture resistance and translucency of zirconia and lithium-disilicate glass ceramics for monolithic restorations. Acta Biomater. 2019;91:24-34.
Tabatabaian F. Color aspect of monolithic zirconia restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:276-287.
Kim A, Campbell SD, Viana MA, et al. Abutment material effect on peri-implant soft tissue color and perceived esthetics. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:634-640.
Sagirkaya E, Arikan S, Sadik B, Kara C, Karasoy D, Cehreli M. A randomized, prospective, open-ended clinical trial of zirconia fixed partial dentures on teeth and implants: interim results. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:221-231.
Raut A, Rao PL, Ravindranath T. Zirconium for esthetic rehabilitation: an overview. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22:140-143.
Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, et al. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29:303-308.
Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38:e2-e16.
Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:S1-S9.
Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: a comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:103-112.
Manziuc MM, Gasparik C, Burde AV, Colosi HA, Negucioiu M, Dudea D. Effect of glazing on translucency, color, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:478-485.
Turgut S. Optical properties of currently used zirconia-based esthetic restorations fabricated with different techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:26-33.
Bayindir F, Koseoglu M. The effect of restoration thickness and resin cement shade on the color and translucency of a high-translucent monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:149-154.
Tabatabaian F, Motamedi E, Sahabi M, Torabzadeh H, Namdari M. Effect of thickness of monolithic zirconia ceramic on final color. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:257-262.
Shamseddine L, Majzoub Z. Relative translucency of a multilayered ultratranslucent zirconia material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18:1099-1106.
Tabatabaian F, Dalirani S, Namdari M. Effect of thickness of zirconia ceramic on its masking ability: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:666-671.
Malkondu O, Tinastepe N, Kazazoglu E. Influence of type of cement on the color and translucency of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:902-908.
Bacchi A, Boccardi S, Alessandretti R, Pereira GKR. Substrate masking ability of bilayer and monolithic ceramics used for complete crowns and the effect of association with an opaque resin-based luting agent. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63:321-326.
Kim HK, Kim SH. Optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Dent. 2016;55:75-81.
Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:193-199.
Tsiliagkou A, Diamantopoulou S, Papazoglou E, Kakaboura A. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11:110-124.
Tabatabaian F, Taghizade F, Namdari M. Effect of coping thickness and background type on the masking ability of a zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:159-165.
Tabatabaian F, Jafari A, Namdari M, Mahshid M. Influence of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations on different implant abutment backgrounds. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:327-332.
Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:37-42.
Perez Mdel M, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Dental ceramics: a CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences. J Dent. 2011;39:e37-e44.
Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Ionescu AM, Cardona JC, Della Bona A, Pérez MM. Optical behavior of dental zirconia and dentin analyzed by Kubelka-Munk theory. Dent Mater. 2015;31:60-67.
Dai S, Chen C, Tang M, et al. Choice of resin cement shades for a high-translucency zirconia product to mask dark, discolored or metal substrates. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11:286-296.
Al Hamad KQ, Obaidat II, Baba NZ. The effect of ceramic type and background color on shade reproducibility of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont. 2018;7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13005.
Pekkan G, Özcan M, Subaşı MG. Clinical factors affecting the translucency of monolithic Y-TZP ceramics. Odontology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00446-2.
Pekkan G, Pekkan K, Bayindir BÇ, et al. Factors affecting the translucency of monolithic zirconia ceramics: a review from materials science perspective. Dent Mater J. 2019;39:1-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-098.