Controversies with nonoperative management for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Study from the APSS Scoliosis Focus Group.
Adolescent
Asia
/ epidemiology
Braces
/ economics
Child
Consensus
Conservative Treatment
/ economics
Disease Progression
Female
Focus Groups
Health Care Surveys
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Internet
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ economics
Male
Oceania
/ epidemiology
Orthopedic Procedures
/ economics
Quality of Life
Scoliosis
/ diagnosis
Socioeconomic Factors
Treatment Outcome
AIS
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
bracing
nonoperative
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)
ISSN: 2309-4990
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9440382
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
13
6
2020
pubmed:
13
6
2020
medline:
20
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine consensus among Asia-Pacific surgeons regarding nonoperative management for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). An online REDCap questionnaire was circulated to surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region during the period of July 2019 to September 2019 to inquire about various components of nonoperative treatment for AIS. Aspects under study included access to screening, when MRIs were obtained, quality-of-life assessments used, role of scoliosis-specific exercises, bracing criteria, type of brace used, maturity parameters used, brace wear regimen, follow-up criteria, and how braces were weaned. Comparisons were made between middle-high income and low-income countries, and experience with nonoperative treatment. A total of 103 responses were collected. About half (52.4%) of the responders had scoliosis screening programs and were particularly situated in middle-high income countries. Up to 34% obtained MRIs for all cases, while most would obtain MRIs for neurological problems. The brace criteria were highly variable and was usually based on menarche status (74.7%), age (59%), and Risser staging (92.8%). Up to 52.4% of surgeons elected to brace patients with large curves before offering surgery. Only 28% of responders utilized CAD-CAM techniques for brace fabrication and most (76.8%) still utilized negative molds. There were no standardized criteria for brace weaning. There are highly variable practices related to nonoperative treatment for AIS and may be related to availability of resources in certain countries. Relative consensus was achieved for when MRI should be obtained and an acceptable brace compliance should be more than 16 hours a day.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32529908
doi: 10.1177/2309499020930291
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM