Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka.
Adult
Animals
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease Notification
Disease Vectors
Female
Humans
Leishmania donovani
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Physicians
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
Psychodidae
Sri Lanka
/ epidemiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Attitude
Knowledge
Leishmaniasis
Notification
Physicians
Practice
Sri Lanka
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jun 2020
12 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
11
12
2019
accepted:
05
06
2020
entrez:
14
6
2020
pubmed:
14
6
2020
medline:
6
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Leishmaniasis is a notifiable disease in Sri Lanka since 2008. Previous studies show a gap in the notification of leishmaniasis. The purpose of the present study was to determine the Knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical officers regarding leishmaniasis. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Anuradhapura district which reported the highest case load of leishmaniasis. Medical officers from public and private health care institutes in the area filled a self-administered questionnaire in the presence of the investigators. One hundred and eighty-eight (188) medical officers completed the questionnaire. Of them, 95.7% were aware of leishmaniasis as a parasitic infection and 84.7% correctly identified Leishmania donovani as the causative organism in Sri Lanka. From the respondents, 181 (96.8%) knew that the vector of leishmaniasis is sand fly. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported as the most prevalent form of leishmaniasis in the country by 176 (94.1%). Nearly half of the respondents (98, 54.1%) were aware of the fact that the Anuradhapura district has the highest disease burden. Many of them had the idea that leishmaniasis is an emerging disease (155, 84.3%,) and early diagnosis is important in controlling the disease (163, 89.1%). Although about three fourth (123, 73.7%,) of the participants mentioned that leishmaniasis should be notified at first clinical suspicion, only 74 (42.5%) were aware that it is a legal requirement. Some medical officers (39, 22%) believed that the current notification system in the country is not effective. Unavailability of notification forms (60, 36.8%) heavy workload (85, 50.3%) and inadequate supportive staff (55, 35.1%) were reported as barriers for timely notification. Even though 105 (58.0%) of medical officers had suspected leishmaniasis during the last 8 years period only 35 (19.4%) had notified. Even though more than 90% of the participants had good theoretical knowledge about leishmaniasis; notification of leishmaniasis is considerably inadequate. This study emphasizes the need for greater efforts to improve the notification of leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Leishmaniasis is a notifiable disease in Sri Lanka since 2008. Previous studies show a gap in the notification of leishmaniasis. The purpose of the present study was to determine the Knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical officers regarding leishmaniasis.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Anuradhapura district which reported the highest case load of leishmaniasis. Medical officers from public and private health care institutes in the area filled a self-administered questionnaire in the presence of the investigators.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred and eighty-eight (188) medical officers completed the questionnaire. Of them, 95.7% were aware of leishmaniasis as a parasitic infection and 84.7% correctly identified Leishmania donovani as the causative organism in Sri Lanka. From the respondents, 181 (96.8%) knew that the vector of leishmaniasis is sand fly. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported as the most prevalent form of leishmaniasis in the country by 176 (94.1%). Nearly half of the respondents (98, 54.1%) were aware of the fact that the Anuradhapura district has the highest disease burden. Many of them had the idea that leishmaniasis is an emerging disease (155, 84.3%,) and early diagnosis is important in controlling the disease (163, 89.1%). Although about three fourth (123, 73.7%,) of the participants mentioned that leishmaniasis should be notified at first clinical suspicion, only 74 (42.5%) were aware that it is a legal requirement. Some medical officers (39, 22%) believed that the current notification system in the country is not effective. Unavailability of notification forms (60, 36.8%) heavy workload (85, 50.3%) and inadequate supportive staff (55, 35.1%) were reported as barriers for timely notification. Even though 105 (58.0%) of medical officers had suspected leishmaniasis during the last 8 years period only 35 (19.4%) had notified.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Even though more than 90% of the participants had good theoretical knowledge about leishmaniasis; notification of leishmaniasis is considerably inadequate. This study emphasizes the need for greater efforts to improve the notification of leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32532244
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09066-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09066-w
pmc: PMC7290071
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
913Références
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;25:53-5
pubmed: 24858902
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Jan;84(1):72-7
pubmed: 16501718
Postgrad Med J. 2007 Feb;83(976):649-57
pubmed: 17396274
Public Health Action. 2015 Sep 21;5(3):173-9
pubmed: 26399287
J Infect. 2014 Nov;69 Suppl 1:S10-8
pubmed: 25238669
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Jun;11(6):899-905
pubmed: 16772012
Malays J Med Sci. 2013 Mar;20(2):52-61
pubmed: 23983578
Health Educ Res. 2014 Dec;29(6):1049-57
pubmed: 25325998
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2003;83(1-3):165-72
pubmed: 12758207
J Vector Borne Dis. 2012 Sep;49(3):157-63
pubmed: 23135010
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP984-92
pubmed: 23572378
N Engl J Med. 1979 Feb 15;300(7):350-2
pubmed: 759896
J Parasitol. 2010 Feb;96(1):230-1
pubmed: 19803542
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jan 25;11(1):60
pubmed: 29370864
Public Health. 2018 Jan;154:130-135
pubmed: 29241098
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35671
pubmed: 22693548
Glob Health Action. 2015 Oct 01;8:28413
pubmed: 26434690
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):855
pubmed: 31619180
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006 Mar;10(3):264-9
pubmed: 16562705
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 13;14:568
pubmed: 25391377
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0123286
pubmed: 25909330
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Jul-Aug;97(4):380-1
pubmed: 15259461