Surgery during COVID-19 crisis conditions: can we protect our ethical integrity against the odds?
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ complications
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making
/ ethics
England
Ethical Analysis
Ethical Theory
Ethics, Medical
General Surgery
/ ethics
Health Equity
/ ethics
Humans
Informed Consent
/ ethics
Moral Obligations
Pandemics
/ ethics
Patient Selection
/ ethics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ complications
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Principle-Based Ethics
Risk Assessment
SARS-CoV-2
State Medicine
Surgeons
Surgical Procedures, Operative
ethics
public health ethics
right to healthcare
surgery
Journal
Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
14
05
2020
accepted:
22
05
2020
pubmed:
14
6
2020
medline:
19
8
2020
entrez:
14
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
COVID-19 is reducing the ability to perform surgical procedures worldwide, giving rise to a multitude of ethical, practical and medical dilemmas. Adapting to crisis conditions requires a rethink of traditional best practices in surgical management, delving into an area of unknown risk profiles. Key challenging areas include cancelling elective operations, modifying procedures to adapt local services and updating the consenting process. We aim to provide an ethical rationale to support change in practice and guide future decision-making. Using the four principles approach as a structure, Medline was searched for existing ethical frameworks aimed at resolving conflicting moral duties. Where insufficient data were available, best guidance was sought from educational institutions: National Health Service England and The Royal College of Surgeons. Multiple papers presenting high-quality, reasoned, ethical theory and practice guidance were collected. Using this as a basis to assess current practice, multiple requirements were generated to ensure preservation of ethical integrity when making management decisions. Careful consideration of ethical principles must guide production of local guidance ensuring consistent patient selection thus preserving equality as well as quality of clinical services. A critical issue is balancing the benefit of surgery against the unknown risk of developing COVID-19 and its associated complications. As such, the need for surgery must be sufficiently pressing to proceed with conventional or non-conventional operative management; otherwise, delaying intervention is justified. For delayed operations, it is our duty to quantify the long-term impact on patients' outcome within the constraints of pandemic management and its long-term outlook.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32532825
pii: medethics-2020-106446
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106446
pmc: PMC7316104
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
505-507Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):734-44; discussion 744-5
pubmed: 22378855
J Med Philos. 2008 Dec;33(6):594-608
pubmed: 19109530
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63
pubmed: 28760214
J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;45(4):371-7
pubmed: 15778417
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30
pubmed: 24849105
Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2366-2374
pubmed: 27743617
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013 Sep;12(3):121-6
pubmed: 23892941
Health Care Anal. 2008 Dec;16(4):315-28
pubmed: 17975729
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(50):iii, ix-51
pubmed: 18021577
J R Soc Med. 2010 May;103(5):178-87
pubmed: 20436026
J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):323-9
pubmed: 11055033
BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):184-8
pubmed: 8044100