Ethics for surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic, review article.
Covid-19
Ethics
Pandemic
Professionalism
Surgeons
Surgery
Journal
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
23
05
2020
revised:
30
05
2020
accepted:
01
06
2020
entrez:
16
6
2020
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
17
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Covid-19 pandemic is a devastating global healthcare emergency with seismic impact on how modern surgical services function. Surgeons worry, that whilst healthcare-resources are directed against the pandemic, double effect may predict these benevolent public health efforts will cause unintended maleficent effects through delays to surgical treatment. Surgeons will make many challenging ethical judgements during this pandemic, here we conduct a narrative review of how medical ethics may help us make the best available choices. A narrative review of all the relevant papers known to the author was conducted. We discuss the key aspects of medical ethics, and how they have applied to surgeons during the Covid-19 pandemic. The four fundamental principles of medical ethics include: Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy and Justice. Surgeons will face many decisions which shall challenge those ethical principles during the pandemic, and wisdom from medical ethics can guide surgeons, to do the right thing, make best available choices, and get the best available outcome for patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. The practice of surgery is distinguished by good judgement in the face of uncertainty, we must strive to do the right thing, advocate for our patients, and be honest in the face of uncertainty. Medical Ethics can guide us to make the best available choices for our patients during the Covid-19 pandemic, afterwards, we must emerge wiser having learnt lessons and rebuilding trust in surgical care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32537140
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.003
pii: S2049-0801(20)30139-4
pmc: PMC7278633
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
316-319Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read and understood the policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare. The responsibility for the content lies with the author and the views stated herein should not be taken to represent those of any organisations or groups with and for which he works.
Références
J Med Ethics. 2007 Apr;33(4):215-8
pubmed: 17400619
Am J Surg. 2020 Apr 21;:
pubmed: 32336519
J Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;45(12):821-823
pubmed: 31399496
Target Oncol. 2020 Jun;15(3):249-259
pubmed: 32445083
Clin Med (Lond). 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6 Suppl 1):S5-40
pubmed: 16408403
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-143
pubmed: 31948345
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr 18;:
pubmed: 32345566
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(4):128
pubmed: 32175421
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 May;21(4):301-308
pubmed: 32310715
Int J Surg. 2020 May 12;79:168-179
pubmed: 32407799
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Nov;19(11):9-12
pubmed: 31647760
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr 9;:
pubmed: 32278725
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
Int J Surg. 2020 May 12;79:233-248
pubmed: 32413502
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Int J Surg. 2020 May 23;79:180-188
pubmed: 32454253