Triple-C SMAS Plication Facelift for Natural Facial Rejuvenation.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 21 07 2019
accepted: 18 10 2019
entrez: 16 6 2020
pubmed: 17 6 2020
medline: 17 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Various methods are used to reposition the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) during facelift procedures. This study presents a novel, radially oriented, layered SMAS plication: the triple-C SMAS plication. This technique utilizes customizable vectors in the pattern of a "C" to plicate the SMAS in 3 layers to lift and tighten the deep structures of the face. A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing the triple-C SMAS plication over a 1-year period. Patients with a length of follow-up less than 100 days were excluded from the study. Demographic data, operative data, complication rates, and satisfaction rates were assessed. One hundred ninety-one consecutive patients underwent a triple-C SMAS plication over a 12-month period. One hundred ten patients met inclusion criteria. Average follow-up was 404.5 days. Complications assessed included temporary facial nerve neuropraxia (0.91%), major hematoma (1.82%), minor hematoma (2.73%), seroma (4.54%), great auricular nerve injury (0%), postauricular skin slough >2 cm (1.82%), and infection (0.91%). Two revision procedures were performed (1.82%). Patient satisfaction rate was 96.4%. Traditional SMAS plication techniques involve single-layer, straight-line plications to lift the lower face and neck, limiting their versatility. The triple-C SMAS plication represents a novel technique to safely and effectively elevate the deep structures of the face in a radial pattern to restore a more youthful contour to the malar area, jawline, and neck. This represents a unique strategy for face lifting by which excellent results can be consistently obtained.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32537313
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002575
pmc: PMC7288867
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e2575

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Références

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Nov;120(6):1667-73
pubmed: 18040204
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):1173-83
pubmed: 25415087
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976 Jul;58(1):80-8
pubmed: 935283
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Jan;105(1):267-85; discussion 286-9
pubmed: 10626999
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jan;83(1):11-6
pubmed: 2909050
Laryngoscope. 2008 Dec;118(12):2107-10
pubmed: 19029853
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jan;119(1):362-76; discussion 377-8
pubmed: 17255694
Clin Plast Surg. 2008 Oct;35(4):553-66, vi
pubmed: 18922309
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Nov;96(6):1279-87; discussion 1288
pubmed: 7480224
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Mar;123(3):1025-33; discussion 1034-6
pubmed: 19319071
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2219-27; discussion 2228-31
pubmed: 17519724
Clin Plast Surg. 2008 Oct;35(4):569-603, vi-vii
pubmed: 18922311
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 May;109(6):2074-86
pubmed: 11994618
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Aug 22;39(9):927-942
pubmed: 30768122

Auteurs

Kevin Sadati (K)

Private Practice, Newport Beach, California.

Saba Motakef (S)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.

Classifications MeSH