Long-term patient-reported outcome measures after injury: National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP) scoping review protocol.
outcome assessment, healthcare
patient-reported outcome measures
wounds and injuries
Journal
Trauma surgery & acute care open
ISSN: 2397-5776
Titre abrégé: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
12
05
2020
accepted:
13
05
2020
entrez:
16
6
2020
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
17
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A significant proportion of patients who survive traumatic injury continue to suffer impaired functional status and increased mortality long after discharge. However, despite the need to improve long-term outcomes, trauma registries in the USA do not collect data on outcomes or care processes after discharge. One of the main barriers is the lack of consensus regarding the optimal outcome metrics. To describe the methodology of a scoping review evaluating current evidence on the available measures for tracking functional and patient-reported outcomes after injury. The aim of the review was to identify and summarize measures that are being used to track long-term functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes among adults after injury. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase will be performed using the search terms for the population (adult trauma patients), type of outcomes (long-term physical, mental, cognitive, and quality of life), and measures available to track them. Studies identified will be reviewed and assessed for relevance by at least two reviewers. Data will be extracted and summarized using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis of the results. This protocol is being reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. This scoping review will provide information regarding the currently available metrics for tracking functional and patient-reported outcomes after injury. The review will be presented to a multi-disciplinary stakeholder group that will evaluate these outcome metrics using an online Delphi approach to achieve consensus as part of the development of the National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP). The results of this review will be presented at relevant national surgical conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A significant proportion of patients who survive traumatic injury continue to suffer impaired functional status and increased mortality long after discharge. However, despite the need to improve long-term outcomes, trauma registries in the USA do not collect data on outcomes or care processes after discharge. One of the main barriers is the lack of consensus regarding the optimal outcome metrics.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To describe the methodology of a scoping review evaluating current evidence on the available measures for tracking functional and patient-reported outcomes after injury. The aim of the review was to identify and summarize measures that are being used to track long-term functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes among adults after injury.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed and Embase will be performed using the search terms for the population (adult trauma patients), type of outcomes (long-term physical, mental, cognitive, and quality of life), and measures available to track them. Studies identified will be reviewed and assessed for relevance by at least two reviewers. Data will be extracted and summarized using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis of the results. This protocol is being reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
DISSEMINATION
RESULTS
This scoping review will provide information regarding the currently available metrics for tracking functional and patient-reported outcomes after injury. The review will be presented to a multi-disciplinary stakeholder group that will evaluate these outcome metrics using an online Delphi approach to achieve consensus as part of the development of the National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP). The results of this review will be presented at relevant national surgical conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32537519
doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000512
pii: tsaco-2020-000512
pmc: PMC7264830
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000512Investigateurs
Pamela J Bixby
(PJ)
Jeffrey A Bailey
(JA)
Karen J Brasel
(KJ)
Maxwell Braverman
(M)
Zara R Cooper
(ZR)
Todd W Costantini
(TW)
James R Ficke
(JR)
Nicole S Gibran
(NS)
Jonathan I Grone
(JI)
Bellal A Joseph
(BA)
Craig D Newgard
(CD)
Edward S Shipper
(ES)
Deborah M Stein
(DM)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Trauma. 1998 Apr;44(4):618-23; discussion 623
pubmed: 9555832
Ann Surg. 2008 Sep;248(3):429-37
pubmed: 18791363
Neuropsychology. 2002 Jan;16(1):15-27
pubmed: 11853353
J Trauma. 2006 Dec;61(6):1393-9
pubmed: 17159682
JAMA. 1998 Jun 3;279(21):1727-31
pubmed: 9624026
Am J Surg. 2016 Apr;211(4):649-55
pubmed: 26822268
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):788-94, 794-6
pubmed: 20421051
J Trauma. 1996 Dec;41(6):952-6
pubmed: 8970545
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Apr;4(2):178-83
pubmed: 21769202
Arch Surg. 1997 Sep;132(9):1010-4
pubmed: 9301615
JAMA. 2011 Mar 9;305(10):1001-7
pubmed: 21386078
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):97-104
pubmed: 28426563
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1165-1173
pubmed: 30550382
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):623-32
pubmed: 26779977
Burns. 2015 Dec;41(8):1732-1740
pubmed: 26440306
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 May;230(5):819-835
pubmed: 32201197