Influence of wood species on toxicity of log-wood stove combustion aerosols: a parallel animal and air-liquid interface cell exposure study on spruce and pine smoke.
A549 Cells
Aerosols
Air Pollutants
/ analysis
Animals
Cell Culture Techniques
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Cytokines
/ metabolism
DNA Damage
Heating
Humans
Inhalation Exposure
/ adverse effects
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Particle Size
Picea
/ chemistry
Pinus
/ chemistry
RAW 264.7 Cells
Smoke
/ adverse effects
Species Specificity
Transcriptome
/ drug effects
Wood
Air liquid-interface (ALI)
Genotoxicity
Inhalation toxicology
Particulate matter (PM)
Transcriptome, proteome
Wood combustion
Journal
Particle and fibre toxicology
ISSN: 1743-8977
Titre abrégé: Part Fibre Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101236354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 06 2020
15 06 2020
Historique:
received:
26
11
2019
accepted:
26
05
2020
entrez:
17
6
2020
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
2
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Wood combustion emissions have been studied previously either by in vitro or in vivo models using collected particles, yet most studies have neglected gaseous compounds. Furthermore, a more accurate and holistic view of the toxicity of aerosols can be gained with parallel in vitro and in vivo studies using direct exposure methods. Moreover, modern exposure techniques such as air-liquid interface (ALI) exposures enable better assessment of the toxicity of the applied aerosols than, for example, the previous state-of-the-art submerged cell exposure techniques. We used three different ALI exposure systems in parallel to study the toxicological effects of spruce and pine combustion emissions in human alveolar epithelial (A549) and murine macrophage (RAW264.7) cell lines. A whole-body mouse inhalation system was also used to expose C57BL/6 J mice to aerosol emissions. Moreover, gaseous and particulate fractions were studied separately in one of the cell exposure systems. After exposure, the cells and animals were measured for various parameters of cytotoxicity, inflammation, genotoxicity, transcriptome and proteome. We found that diluted (1:15) exposure pine combustion emissions (PM Comprehensive in vitro and in vivo exposure studies with emission characterization and systems biology approaches revealed further information on the effects of combustion aerosol toxicity than could be achieved with either method alone. Interestingly, in vitro and in vivo exposures showed the opposite order of the highest DNA damage. In vitro measurements also indicated that the gaseous fraction of emission aerosols may be more important in causing adverse toxicological effects. Combustion aerosols of different wood species result in mild but aerosol specific in vitro and in vivo effects.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Wood combustion emissions have been studied previously either by in vitro or in vivo models using collected particles, yet most studies have neglected gaseous compounds. Furthermore, a more accurate and holistic view of the toxicity of aerosols can be gained with parallel in vitro and in vivo studies using direct exposure methods. Moreover, modern exposure techniques such as air-liquid interface (ALI) exposures enable better assessment of the toxicity of the applied aerosols than, for example, the previous state-of-the-art submerged cell exposure techniques.
METHODS
We used three different ALI exposure systems in parallel to study the toxicological effects of spruce and pine combustion emissions in human alveolar epithelial (A549) and murine macrophage (RAW264.7) cell lines. A whole-body mouse inhalation system was also used to expose C57BL/6 J mice to aerosol emissions. Moreover, gaseous and particulate fractions were studied separately in one of the cell exposure systems. After exposure, the cells and animals were measured for various parameters of cytotoxicity, inflammation, genotoxicity, transcriptome and proteome.
RESULTS
We found that diluted (1:15) exposure pine combustion emissions (PM
CONCLUSIONS
Comprehensive in vitro and in vivo exposure studies with emission characterization and systems biology approaches revealed further information on the effects of combustion aerosol toxicity than could be achieved with either method alone. Interestingly, in vitro and in vivo exposures showed the opposite order of the highest DNA damage. In vitro measurements also indicated that the gaseous fraction of emission aerosols may be more important in causing adverse toxicological effects. Combustion aerosols of different wood species result in mild but aerosol specific in vitro and in vivo effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32539833
doi: 10.1186/s12989-020-00355-1
pii: 10.1186/s12989-020-00355-1
pmc: PMC7296712
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aerosols
0
Air Pollutants
0
Cytokines
0
Smoke
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27Références
Toxicol In Vitro. 2005 Apr;19(3):411-9
pubmed: 15713548
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Apr 18;13:1261-1267
pubmed: 29713159
Occup Environ Med. 2008 May;65(5):319-24
pubmed: 17704195
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 15;443:256-66
pubmed: 23201646
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 1;511:331-40
pubmed: 25553547
Toxicol In Vitro. 2017 Aug;42:319-328
pubmed: 28506819
Acc Chem Res. 2016 Oct 18;49(10):2136-2145
pubmed: 27668965
Allergy. 2018 Nov;73(11):2192-2204
pubmed: 29672862
Inhal Toxicol. 2012 Dec;24(14):952-65
pubmed: 23216156
Toxicol Lett. 2006 Sep 10;165(3):203-11
pubmed: 16716543
Free Radic Biol Med. 2015 Dec;89:342-57
pubmed: 26408075
Int Immunopharmacol. 2015 Oct;28(2):1097-101
pubmed: 26321116
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 Jun 15;245(3):344-51
pubmed: 20353797
Inhal Toxicol. 2010 Dec;22 Suppl 2:48-58
pubmed: 21029031
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 27;11(6):e0157964
pubmed: 27348622
Toxicology. 2008 May 21;247(2-3):123-32
pubmed: 18406506
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014 Nov 25;11:60
pubmed: 25420696
Inhal Toxicol. 2006 Jul;18(8):523-39
pubmed: 16717024
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2009 Dec 16;6:32
pubmed: 20015351
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2013 Nov;23(9):711-22
pubmed: 24024665
Sci Total Environ. 2001 Sep 28;277(1-3):69-75
pubmed: 11589408
Environ Pollut. 2003;124(2):283-9
pubmed: 12713928
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2597-2605
pubmed: 30340194
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2015 Oct 29;12:33
pubmed: 26511835
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184519
pubmed: 28886142
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Jun;122(6):639-45
pubmed: 24694350
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2012 Nov 23;9:45
pubmed: 23176191
Environ Pollut. 2017 Feb;221:130-140
pubmed: 27914859
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Sep;57(9):1014-23
pubmed: 17912920
Chem Biol Interact. 2018 Oct 1;294:81-90
pubmed: 30145136
J Biol Chem. 2008 Oct 24;283(43):28944-57
pubmed: 18697742
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jun;117(6):893-7
pubmed: 19590679
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Mar;22(6):4076-98
pubmed: 25410307
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Sep 20;50(18):10073-81
pubmed: 27552181
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 15;612:636-648
pubmed: 28866392
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Nov 18;48(22):13298-306
pubmed: 25365741
Can Respir J. 2016;2016:3564341
pubmed: 27445529
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1999 Nov;51(6):489-90
pubmed: 10661806
PPAR Res. 2007;2007:14983
pubmed: 18000530
Inhal Toxicol. 2006 Jan;18(1):33-43
pubmed: 16326399
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 03;10(6):e0126536
pubmed: 26039251
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 15;379:114644
pubmed: 31255691
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 21;13(12):e0209690
pubmed: 30576387
Toxicol Lett. 2010 Jun 16;196(1):33-41
pubmed: 20362040
Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:305-45
pubmed: 15568979
Toxicol In Vitro. 2007 Oct;21(7):1341-7
pubmed: 17574383
Toxicol Ind Health. 2018 Feb;34(2):99-109
pubmed: 29415641
Inhal Toxicol. 2019 Feb;31(3):89-98
pubmed: 31066325
Toxicol Lett. 2017 Jul 5;276:31-38
pubmed: 28465192
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014 Nov 1;280(3):511-25
pubmed: 25178717
Biomolecules. 2015 Jul 02;5(3):1399-440
pubmed: 26147224
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Jan 24;126(1):017011
pubmed: 29373863
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(6):1081-7
pubmed: 21808879
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2018 Jun 4;15(1):25
pubmed: 29866184
Arch Toxicol. 2016 Dec;90(12):3029-3044
pubmed: 26838041
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 10;5:12945
pubmed: 26256047
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1992 Feb;6(2):235-43
pubmed: 1540387
Chem Res Toxicol. 2011 Feb 18;24(2):168-84
pubmed: 21235221
Mutat Res. 1996 Dec 20;371(3-4):123-57
pubmed: 9008716
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001 Nov 15;177(1):46-53
pubmed: 11708899
Inhal Toxicol. 2009 Feb;21(2):91-101
pubmed: 18800273
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Dec 20;14:513
pubmed: 25528348
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Nov;124(11):1776-1784
pubmed: 27177206
Chem Res Toxicol. 2014 Sep 15;27(9):1516-27
pubmed: 25063562
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1907-1918
pubmed: 28408086
Environ Toxicol. 2017 May;32(5):1487-1499
pubmed: 27678477
Atmos Environ (1994). 2012 May;51(C):86-93
pubmed: 23471123
Eur Respir J. 2015 Dec;46(6):1577-88
pubmed: 26405285
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014 Nov 1;307(9):L692-706
pubmed: 25128521
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 May;60(5):392-423
pubmed: 29334526
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jan 24;18(2):
pubmed: 28125025
Environ Res. 2018 Feb;161:35-48
pubmed: 29100208
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192453
pubmed: 29466392
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 1;366:25-34
pubmed: 30641076
Inhal Toxicol. 2016;28(4):180-91
pubmed: 26986953