Radiative Auger process in the single-photon limit.
Journal
Nature nanotechnology
ISSN: 1748-3395
Titre abrégé: Nat Nanotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101283273
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
10
12
2019
accepted:
22
04
2020
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
17
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In a multi-electron atom, an excited electron can decay by emitting a photon. Typically, the leftover electrons are in their ground state. In a radiative Auger process, the leftover electrons are in an excited state and a redshifted photon is created
Identifiants
pubmed: 32541943
doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0697-2
pii: 10.1038/s41565-020-0697-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
558-562Subventions
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation | National Center of Competence in Research Quantum Science and Technology (NCCR "QSIT - Quantum Science and Technology")
ID : 200020 156637
Organisme : EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020)
ID : 840453
Organisme : EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020)
ID : 721394
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : TRR160
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 383065199
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research)
ID : Q.Link.X 16KIS0867
Organisme : Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (Danish National Research Foundation)
ID : DNRF139
Organisme : EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council)
ID : SCALE
Références
Åberg, T. & Utriainen, J. Evidence for a ‘radiative Auger effect’ in X-ray photon emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1346–1348 (1969).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.1346
Åberg, T. Theory of the radiative Auger effect. Phys. Rev. A 4, 1735–1740 (1971).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.4.1735
Bloch, F. & Ross, P. A. Radiative Auger effect. Phys. Rev. 47, 884–885 (1935).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.884
Bloch, F. Double electron transitions in X-ray spectra. Phys. Rev. 48, 187 (1935).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.48.187
Hawrylak, P. Single Quantum Dots: Fundamentals, Applications and New Concepts Vol. 90 (Springer Science, Business Media, 2003).
Bambynek, W. et al. X-ray fluorescence yields, Auger, and Coster–Kronig transition probabilities. Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 716–813 (1972).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.44.716
Barthés-Labrousse, M.-G. The Auger effect. Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 6, 253–262 (1995).
doi: 10.1051/mmm:1995122
Kurzmann, A., Ludwig, A., Wieck, A. D., Lorke, A. & Geller, M. Auger recombination in self-assembled quantum dots: quenching and broadening of the charged exciton transition. Nano Lett. 16, 3367–3372 (2016).
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01082
Han, B. et al. Exciton states in monolayer MoSe
Siyushev, P. et al. Optically controlled switching of the charge state of a single nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond at cryogenic temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 167402 (2013).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.167402
Blood, P. Quantum Confined Laser Devices: Optical Gain and Recombination in Semiconductors Vol. 23 (OUP Oxford, 2015).
Carlson, T. A. Electron shake-off following the beta decay of Ne
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.130.2361
Dean, P. J., Cuthbert, J. D., Thomas, D. G. & Lynch, R. T. Two-electron transitions in the luminescence of excitons bound to neutral donors in gallium phosphide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 122–124 (1967).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.122
Skolnick, M. S. et al. Fermi sea shake-up in quantum well luminescence spectra. Solid State Electron. 37, 825–829 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0038-1101(94)90306-9
Manfra, M. J., Goldberg, B. B., Pfeiffer, L. & West, K. Anderson–Fano resonance and shake-up processes in the magnetophotoluminescence of a two-dimensional electron system. Phys. Rev. B 57, R9467–R9470 (1998).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R9467
Kleemans, N. A. J. M. et al. Many-body exciton states in self-assembled quantum dots coupled to a Fermi sea. Nat. Phys. 6, 534–538 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nphys1673
Huo, Y. H., Rastelli, A. & Schmidt, O. G. Ultra-small excitonic fine structure splitting in highly symmetric quantum dots on GaAs (001) substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 152105 (2013).
doi: 10.1063/1.4802088
Warburton, R. J. et al. Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring. Nature 405, 926–929 (2000).
doi: 10.1038/35016030
Hansom, J., Schulte, C. H. H., Matthiesen, C., Stanley, M. J. & Atatüre, M. Frequency stabilization of the zero-phonon line of a quantum dot via phonon-assisted active feedback. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 172107 (2014).
doi: 10.1063/1.4901045
Koong, Z. X. et al. Fundamental limits to coherent photon generation with solid-state atom-like transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 167402 (2019).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.167402
Brash, A. J. et al. Light scattering from solid-state quantum emitters: beyond the atomic picture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 167403 (2019).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.167403
Kouwenhoven, L. P., Austing, D. G. & Tarucha, S. Few-electron quantum dots. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 701–736 (2001).
doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/64/6/201
Fock, V. Bemerkung zur Quantelung des harmonischen Oszillators im Magnetfeld. Z. Phys. 47, 446–448 (1928).
doi: 10.1007/BF01390750
Darwin, C. G. The diamagnetism of the free electron. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 27, 86 (1930).
doi: 10.1017/S0305004100009373
Ohnesorge, B., Albrecht, M., Oshinowo, J., Forchel, A. & Arakawa, Y. Rapid carrier relaxation in self-assembled In
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11532
Kurtze, H. et al. Carrier relaxation dynamics in self-assembled semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 80, 235319 (2009).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.235319
Li, X.-Q., Nakayama, H. & Arakawa, Y. Phonon bottleneck in quantum dots: role of lifetime of the confined optical phonons. Phys. Rev. B 59, 5069–5073 (1999).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.5069
Müller, K. et al. Probing ultrafast carrier tunneling dynamics in individual quantum dots and molecules. Ann. Phys. 525, 49–58 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/andp.201200195
Slater, J. C. The theory of complex spectra. Phys. Rev. 34, 1293–1322 (1929).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.34.1293
Bethe, H. A. & Jackiw, R. Intermediate Quantum Mechanics (CRC Press, 2018).
Löbl, M. C. et al. Narrow optical linewidths and spin pumping on charge-tunable close-to-surface self-assembled quantum dots in an ultrathin diode. Phys. Rev. B 96, 165440 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.165440
Vora, P. M. et al. Spin-cavity interactions between a quantum dot molecule and a photonic crystal cavity. Nat. Commun. 6, 7665 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms8665
Javadi, A. et al. Spin-photon interface and spin-controlled photon switching in a nanobeam waveguide. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 398–403 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0091-5
Grim, J. Q. et al. Scalable in operando strain tuning in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three-quantum-dot superradiance. Nat. Mater. 18, 963–969 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0418-0
Wang, Z. M., Liang, B. L., Sablon, K. A. & Salamo, G. J. Nanoholes fabricated by self-assembled gallium nanodrill on GaAs(100). Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 113120 (2007).
doi: 10.1063/1.2713745
Patel, R. B. et al. Two-photon interference of the emission from electrically tunable remote quantum dots. Nat. Photon. 4, 632–635 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.161
Kiršanskė, G. et al. Indistinguishable and efficient single photons from a quantum dot in a planar nanobeam waveguide. Phys. Rev. B 96, 165306 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.165306
Kroutvar, M. et al. Optically programmable electron spin memory using semiconductor quantum dots. Nature 432, 81–84 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nature03008
Dreiser, J. et al. Optical investigations of quantum dot spin dynamics as a function of external electric and magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 77, 075317 (2008).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075317
Smith, J. M. et al. Voltage control of the spin dynamics of an exciton in a semiconductor quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 197402 (2005).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.197402