The Spanish Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) study: A cross-sectional survey.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
28
03
2020
accepted:
31
05
2020
entrez:
17
6
2020
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the growth of the osteopathic profession in Spain in the last few years, reliable information regarding professional profile and prevalence is still lacking. The Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) project was developed as a European-based survey dedicated to profiling the osteopathic profession across Europe. The present study aims to describe the characteristics of osteopathic practitioners, their professional profile and the features of their clinical practice. A voluntary, validated online-based survey was distributed across Spain between January and May 2018. The survey, composed of 54 questions and 5 sections, was formally translated from English to Spanish and adapted from the original version. Because there is not a unique representative osteopathic professional body in Spain, a dedicated website was created for this study, and participation was encouraged through both specific agreements with national registers/associations and an e-based campaign. A total of 517 osteopaths participated in the study, of which 310 were male (60%). The majority of respondents were aged between 30-39 years (53%) and 98% had an academic degree, mainly in physiotherapy. Eighty-five per cent of the respondents completed a minimum of four-year part-time course in osteopathy. Eighty-nine per cent of the participants were self-employed. Fifty-eight per cent of them own their clinic, and 40% declared to work as sole practitioner. Thirty-one per cent see an average of 21 to 30 patients per week for 46-60 minutes each. The most commonly used diagnostic techniques are movement assessment, palpation of structures/position and assessment of tenderness and trigger points. Regarding treatment modalities, articulatory/mobilisation techniques followed by visceral techniques and progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures is often to always used. The majority of patients estimated by the respondents sought osteopathic treatment for musculoskeletal problems mainly localised on the lumbar and cervical region. The majority of respondents manifest a robust professional identity and a collective desire to be regulated as a healthcare profession. This study represents the first published document to determine the characteristics of the osteopathic practitioners in Spain using large, national data. To date, it represents the most informative document related to the osteopathic community in Spain. It brings new information on where, how, and by whom osteopathy is practised in the country. The information provided could potentially influence the development of the profession in Spain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite the growth of the osteopathic profession in Spain in the last few years, reliable information regarding professional profile and prevalence is still lacking. The Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) project was developed as a European-based survey dedicated to profiling the osteopathic profession across Europe. The present study aims to describe the characteristics of osteopathic practitioners, their professional profile and the features of their clinical practice.
METHODS
A voluntary, validated online-based survey was distributed across Spain between January and May 2018. The survey, composed of 54 questions and 5 sections, was formally translated from English to Spanish and adapted from the original version. Because there is not a unique representative osteopathic professional body in Spain, a dedicated website was created for this study, and participation was encouraged through both specific agreements with national registers/associations and an e-based campaign.
RESULTS
A total of 517 osteopaths participated in the study, of which 310 were male (60%). The majority of respondents were aged between 30-39 years (53%) and 98% had an academic degree, mainly in physiotherapy. Eighty-five per cent of the respondents completed a minimum of four-year part-time course in osteopathy. Eighty-nine per cent of the participants were self-employed. Fifty-eight per cent of them own their clinic, and 40% declared to work as sole practitioner. Thirty-one per cent see an average of 21 to 30 patients per week for 46-60 minutes each. The most commonly used diagnostic techniques are movement assessment, palpation of structures/position and assessment of tenderness and trigger points. Regarding treatment modalities, articulatory/mobilisation techniques followed by visceral techniques and progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures is often to always used. The majority of patients estimated by the respondents sought osteopathic treatment for musculoskeletal problems mainly localised on the lumbar and cervical region. The majority of respondents manifest a robust professional identity and a collective desire to be regulated as a healthcare profession.
CONCLUSIONS
This study represents the first published document to determine the characteristics of the osteopathic practitioners in Spain using large, national data. To date, it represents the most informative document related to the osteopathic community in Spain. It brings new information on where, how, and by whom osteopathy is practised in the country. The information provided could potentially influence the development of the profession in Spain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32542047
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234713
pii: PONE-D-20-08905
pmc: PMC7295231
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0234713Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Man Ther. 2014 Apr;19(2):125-30
pubmed: 24139392
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0224098
pubmed: 31644559
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211353
pubmed: 30682169
JAMA. 2009 Feb 25;301(8):863-4
pubmed: 19244195
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Apr;23(4):318-28
pubmed: 11997201
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 03;9(9):e106259
pubmed: 25184204
J Interprof Care. 2002 Feb;16(1):7-17
pubmed: 11915720
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 10;18(1):352
pubmed: 29747647
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):810
pubmed: 30352584
Physiother Res Int. 2007 Sep;12(3):147-61
pubmed: 17624895
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Feb;27:165-175
pubmed: 27852531
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):129
pubmed: 29642901
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 1;8(8):e023770
pubmed: 30173163
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Dec 8;19(1):439
pubmed: 30526551
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2017 Sep;15(3):127-141
pubmed: 28399014
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Aug 01;14:227
pubmed: 23915239