A Nonproprietary Movement Analysis System (MoJoXlab) Based on Wearable Inertial Measurement Units Applicable to Healthy Participants and Those With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Across a Range of Complex Tasks: Validation Study.
algorithms
anterior cruciate ligament
digital physiotherapy
exercise therapy
gait
kinematics
lower extremity
motion trackers
range of motion
wearable electronic devices
wearables
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 06 2020
16 06 2020
Historique:
received:
17
01
2020
accepted:
30
03
2020
revised:
30
03
2020
entrez:
17
6
2020
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
19
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Movement analysis in a clinical setting is frequently restricted to observational methods to inform clinical decision making, which has limited accuracy. Fixed-site, optical, expensive movement analysis laboratories provide gold standard kinematic measurements; however, they are rarely accessed for routine clinical use. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated as comparable, inexpensive, and portable movement analysis toolkits. MoJoXlab has therefore been developed to work with generic wearable IMUs. However, before using MoJoXlab in clinical practice, there is a need to establish its validity in participants with and without knee conditions across a range of tasks with varying complexity. This paper aimed to present the validation of MoJoXlab software for using generic wearable IMUs for calculating hip, knee, and ankle joint angle measurements in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes for walking, squatting, and jumping in healthy participants and those with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Movement data were collected from 27 healthy participants and 20 participants with ACL reconstruction. In each case, the participants wore seven MTw2 IMUs (Xsens Technologies) to monitor their movement in walking, jumping, and squatting tasks. The hip, knee, and ankle joint angles were calculated in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes using two different software packages: Xsens' validated proprietary MVN Analyze and MoJoXlab. The results were validated by comparing the generated waveforms, cross-correlation (CC), and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) values. Across all joints and activities, for data of both healthy and ACL reconstruction participants, the CC and NRMSE values for the sagittal plane are 0.99 (SD 0.01) and 0.042 (SD 0.025); 0.88 (SD 0.048) and 0.18 (SD 0.078) for the frontal plane; and 0.85 (SD 0.027) and 0.23 (SD 0.065) for the transverse plane (hip and knee joints only). On comparing the results from the two different software systems, the sagittal plane was very highly correlated, with frontal and transverse planes showing strong correlation. This study demonstrates that nonproprietary software such as MoJoXlab can accurately calculate joint angles for movement analysis applications comparable with proprietary software for walking, squatting, and jumping in healthy individuals and those following ACL reconstruction. MoJoXlab can be used with generic wearable IMUs that can provide clinicians accurate objective data when assessing patients' movement, even when changes are too small to be observed visually. The availability of easy-to-setup, nonproprietary software for calibration, data collection, and joint angle calculation has the potential to increase the adoption of wearable IMU sensors in clinical practice, as well as in free living conditions, and may provide wider access to accurate, objective assessment of patients' progress over time.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Movement analysis in a clinical setting is frequently restricted to observational methods to inform clinical decision making, which has limited accuracy. Fixed-site, optical, expensive movement analysis laboratories provide gold standard kinematic measurements; however, they are rarely accessed for routine clinical use. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated as comparable, inexpensive, and portable movement analysis toolkits. MoJoXlab has therefore been developed to work with generic wearable IMUs. However, before using MoJoXlab in clinical practice, there is a need to establish its validity in participants with and without knee conditions across a range of tasks with varying complexity.
OBJECTIVE
This paper aimed to present the validation of MoJoXlab software for using generic wearable IMUs for calculating hip, knee, and ankle joint angle measurements in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes for walking, squatting, and jumping in healthy participants and those with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
METHODS
Movement data were collected from 27 healthy participants and 20 participants with ACL reconstruction. In each case, the participants wore seven MTw2 IMUs (Xsens Technologies) to monitor their movement in walking, jumping, and squatting tasks. The hip, knee, and ankle joint angles were calculated in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes using two different software packages: Xsens' validated proprietary MVN Analyze and MoJoXlab. The results were validated by comparing the generated waveforms, cross-correlation (CC), and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) values.
RESULTS
Across all joints and activities, for data of both healthy and ACL reconstruction participants, the CC and NRMSE values for the sagittal plane are 0.99 (SD 0.01) and 0.042 (SD 0.025); 0.88 (SD 0.048) and 0.18 (SD 0.078) for the frontal plane; and 0.85 (SD 0.027) and 0.23 (SD 0.065) for the transverse plane (hip and knee joints only). On comparing the results from the two different software systems, the sagittal plane was very highly correlated, with frontal and transverse planes showing strong correlation.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that nonproprietary software such as MoJoXlab can accurately calculate joint angles for movement analysis applications comparable with proprietary software for walking, squatting, and jumping in healthy individuals and those following ACL reconstruction. MoJoXlab can be used with generic wearable IMUs that can provide clinicians accurate objective data when assessing patients' movement, even when changes are too small to be observed visually. The availability of easy-to-setup, nonproprietary software for calibration, data collection, and joint angle calculation has the potential to increase the adoption of wearable IMU sensors in clinical practice, as well as in free living conditions, and may provide wider access to accurate, objective assessment of patients' progress over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32543446
pii: v8i6e17872
doi: 10.2196/17872
pmc: PMC7327594
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e17872Informations de copyright
©Riasat Islam, Mohamed Bennasar, Kevin Nicholas, Kate Button, Simon Holland, Paul Mulholland, Blaine Price, Mohammad Al-Amri. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 16.06.2020.
Références
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Dec 10;16(12):
pubmed: 27973406
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Apr 16;14(4):6891-909
pubmed: 24743160
J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):543-8
pubmed: 11934426
Hum Mov Sci. 2006 Dec;25(6):788-99
pubmed: 16884800
J Biomech. 2011 Mar 15;44(5):972-8
pubmed: 21306714
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010 Jan;48(1):1-15
pubmed: 19911215
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jun;25(6):653-85
pubmed: 19501297
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013 Apr;51(4):377-86
pubmed: 23224902
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Feb;28(2 Suppl):S13-25
pubmed: 22301008
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Feb 28;18(3):
pubmed: 29495600
J Biomech. 2019 Mar 6;85:224-229
pubmed: 30732911
Br J Sports Med. 2000 Jun;34(3):227-8
pubmed: 10854030
Physiol Meas. 2013 Aug;34(8):N63-9
pubmed: 23893094
J Biomech. 2019 May 24;89:105-109
pubmed: 30981425
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Jul;60(7):1920-6
pubmed: 23392337
J Biomech. 1995 Oct;28(10):1257-61
pubmed: 8550644
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Feb;29(2):206-12
pubmed: 24447417
J Biomech. 2014 Feb 07;47(3):675-80
pubmed: 24342500
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Dec 22;5(12):2325967117745487
pubmed: 29318174
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;48(21):1543-52
pubmed: 25157180
Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):65-9
pubmed: 25957652
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Apr;55(4):609-619
pubmed: 27379397
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1229-36
pubmed: 20386133
Acta Orthop. 2009 Oct;80(5):563-7
pubmed: 19916690
PM R. 2015 Dec;7(12):1243-1253
pubmed: 26003872
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:3488-91
pubmed: 22255091
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999 Jul;37(4):440-4
pubmed: 10696699
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007 Jun;17(3):230-7
pubmed: 17501866
J Biomech Eng. 1983 May;105(2):136-44
pubmed: 6865355
Sports Med. 2018 May;48(5):1221-1246
pubmed: 29476427
Med Eng Phys. 1999 Mar;21(2):87-94
pubmed: 10426508
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Feb 28;11:19
pubmed: 24581172
Gait Posture. 2009 Jun;29(4):535-41
pubmed: 19150239
J Biomech. 2012 May 11;45(8):1472-7
pubmed: 22405496