Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ drug therapy
Aspirin
/ adverse effects
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ epidemiology
Drug Therapy, Combination
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Sirolimus
/ administration & dosage
Ticlopidine
/ adverse effects
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 06 2020
16 06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
17
6
2020
pubmed:
17
6
2020
medline:
2
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Discontinuing aspirin after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was evaluated as a bleeding reduction strategy. However, the strategy of ticagrelor monotherapy has not been exclusively evaluated in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). To determine whether switching to ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT reduces net adverse clinical events compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT in patients with ACS treated with drug-eluting stents. A randomized multicenter trial was conducted in 3056 patients with ACS treated with drug-eluting stents between August 2015 and October 2018 at 38 centers in South Korea. Follow-up was completed in October 2019. Patients were randomized to receive ticagrelor monotherapy (90 mg twice daily) after 3-month DAPT (n = 1527) or ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (n = 1529). The primary outcome was a 1-year net adverse clinical event, defined as a composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target-vessel revascularization). Prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Among 3056 patients who were randomized (mean age, 61 years; 628 women [20%]; 36% ST-elevation myocardial infarction), 2978 patients (97.4%) completed the trial. The primary outcome occurred in 59 patients (3.9%) receiving ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT and in 89 patients (5.9%) receiving ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (absolute difference, -1.98% [95% CI, -3.50% to -0.45%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92]; P = .01). Of 10 prespecified secondary outcomes, 8 showed no significant difference. Major bleeding occurred in 1.7% of patients with ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT and in 3.0% of patients with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.91]; P = .02). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was not significantly different between the ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT group (2.3%) vs the ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT group (3.4%) (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.45 to 1.06]; P = .09). Among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with drug-eluting stents, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy, compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy, resulted in a modest but statistically significant reduction in a composite outcome of major bleeding and cardiovascular events at 1 year. The study population and lower than expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02494895.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32543684
pii: 2767161
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580
pmc: PMC7298605
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Ticlopidine
OM90ZUW7M1
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Sirolimus
W36ZG6FT64
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02494895']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2407-2416Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 9;60(15):1340-8
pubmed: 22999717
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2032-2042
pubmed: 31556978
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1045-57
pubmed: 19717846
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2428-2437
pubmed: 31237645
Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51
pubmed: 17470709
Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1865-1877
pubmed: 31553203
Lancet. 2015 Jun 13;385(9985):2371-82
pubmed: 25777667
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2001-15
pubmed: 17982182
JAMA. 2013 Dec 18;310(23):2510-22
pubmed: 24177257
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1843-1852
pubmed: 28851504
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 25;9(14):1438-46
pubmed: 27212028
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47
pubmed: 21670242
Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1274-1284
pubmed: 29544699
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427
pubmed: 31237644
BMJ. 2018 Oct 2;363:k3793
pubmed: 30279197
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11):
pubmed: 27803041
Circulation. 2012 Oct 16;126(16):2020-35
pubmed: 22923432
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1082-115
pubmed: 27036918
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;15(8):480-496
pubmed: 29973709
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260
pubmed: 28886622
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):940-949
pubmed: 30166073
Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(23):2933-44
pubmed: 22090660
EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 06;15(11):e990-e998
pubmed: 31422929
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1243-1253
pubmed: 31488372
Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2064-89
pubmed: 23652265
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 27;51(21):2028-33
pubmed: 18498956
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007 Jan-Feb;49(4):284-99
pubmed: 17185116
Am Heart J. 2019 Jun;212:45-52
pubmed: 30933857