Diabetic patient assessment of chronic illness care using PACIC.
CES-D
Chronic care model
Chronic illness
Diabetes
Quality of life
SF-36
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jun 2020
16 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
20
05
2019
accepted:
04
06
2020
entrez:
18
6
2020
pubmed:
18
6
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care plus is used in order to assess whether provided care is congruent with the Chronic Care Model, according to patients. The purpose of this study was to correlate PACIC+ and the revised 5As "ask, advise, agree, assist and arrange" scoring of a sample of DM patients, with their QoL, depressive symptomatology, demographic and disease characteristics, self-management behaviours of healthy eating and physical activity. This is a cross-sectional study where data were collected between January and April 2018 by using three questionnaires (PACIC+, SF-36, CES-D) from a sample of 90 DM patients treated at a Public General Hospital of Central Greece. Anonymous self-completed questionnaires were used to collect the data. Data was processed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The mean age of the participants with DM was 52.8 years (SD = 21.2 years), with cardiovascular disease and arterial hypertension scoring as the most frequently reporting chronic comorbidities. The healthcare received by DM patients has been correlated with their QoL. More specifically SF - 36 and PACIC+ scale scores showed a positive and low correlation in several subscales. The total score of PACIC+ scale as well as the Patient activation score were increased in higher scores of vitality (p = 0.034 & p = 0.028 respectively), hence both scores correlate significantly with latter. In addition, Delivery System / Practice Design score was increased in higher scores of mental health (p = 0.01) and MCS (p = 0.03). The shift from hospital care focusing on the disease to a more patient-oriented approach puts forward a dynamic holistic approach to chronic diseases and the reduction of their impact. Finding evidence-based and effective strategies to promote health, prevent and manage chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus is deemed to be crucial and necessary. PACIC+, which is a tool of a patient-level assessment of CCM implementation, can be used by countries which intend to apply changes in the way their health systems provide chronic care and specifically wish to improve the quality of chronic disease care and the QoL of their patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care plus is used in order to assess whether provided care is congruent with the Chronic Care Model, according to patients. The purpose of this study was to correlate PACIC+ and the revised 5As "ask, advise, agree, assist and arrange" scoring of a sample of DM patients, with their QoL, depressive symptomatology, demographic and disease characteristics, self-management behaviours of healthy eating and physical activity.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a cross-sectional study where data were collected between January and April 2018 by using three questionnaires (PACIC+, SF-36, CES-D) from a sample of 90 DM patients treated at a Public General Hospital of Central Greece. Anonymous self-completed questionnaires were used to collect the data. Data was processed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean age of the participants with DM was 52.8 years (SD = 21.2 years), with cardiovascular disease and arterial hypertension scoring as the most frequently reporting chronic comorbidities. The healthcare received by DM patients has been correlated with their QoL. More specifically SF - 36 and PACIC+ scale scores showed a positive and low correlation in several subscales. The total score of PACIC+ scale as well as the Patient activation score were increased in higher scores of vitality (p = 0.034 & p = 0.028 respectively), hence both scores correlate significantly with latter. In addition, Delivery System / Practice Design score was increased in higher scores of mental health (p = 0.01) and MCS (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The shift from hospital care focusing on the disease to a more patient-oriented approach puts forward a dynamic holistic approach to chronic diseases and the reduction of their impact. Finding evidence-based and effective strategies to promote health, prevent and manage chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus is deemed to be crucial and necessary. PACIC+, which is a tool of a patient-level assessment of CCM implementation, can be used by countries which intend to apply changes in the way their health systems provide chronic care and specifically wish to improve the quality of chronic disease care and the QoL of their patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32546232
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05400-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05400-5
pmc: PMC7296774
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
543Références
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jun 13;165(11):1260-6
pubmed: 15956005
Fam Pract. 2009 Apr;26(2):102-8
pubmed: 19254969
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 1999 May-Jun;15(3):205-18
pubmed: 10441043
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1989 Oct;177(10):581-92
pubmed: 2677237
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(8):661-70
pubmed: 11871587
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 May;50(5 Suppl):1112-5
pubmed: 18360834
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):64-74
pubmed: 19124856
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 01;8:182
pubmed: 18761749
Neurology. 1993 Apr;43(4):817-24
pubmed: 8469345
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Oct;5(4):A113
pubmed: 18793501
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 May;80(2):171-84
pubmed: 18279993
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Feb 01;18(2):e55-60
pubmed: 22435885
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Sep;49(9):2236-45
pubmed: 1524070
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 31;12:293
pubmed: 22938193
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Sep 10;144:w13992
pubmed: 25207723
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):806-13
pubmed: 17824876
Psychosom Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;69(6):529-36
pubmed: 17636146
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010 Jun 15;9:23
pubmed: 20550650
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 11;12:114
pubmed: 22578251
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-85
pubmed: 19124857
Diabetes Care. 1988 Sep;11(8):605-12
pubmed: 3219966
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Apr;35(4):373-80
pubmed: 9134792
Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;150(1):124-9
pubmed: 8417554
Diabetes Care. 2000 Sep;23(9):1272-7
pubmed: 10977018
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Feb;22(1):31-6
pubmed: 21134901
BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4
pubmed: 1285753
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(5):345-52
pubmed: 16955620
Diabet Med. 1990 Jun;7(5):445-51
pubmed: 2142043
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44
pubmed: 15838407
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 11;167(11):1137-44
pubmed: 17563021
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78
pubmed: 11816692
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843
pubmed: 31518657
Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511-44
pubmed: 8941260
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):215-21
pubmed: 20846281
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 07;12:242
pubmed: 22871023
Diabetes Care. 1993 Nov;16(11):1507-10
pubmed: 8299440
Disabil Health J. 2016 Jul;9(3):518-23
pubmed: 26996759
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;118:162-7
pubmed: 27372056
Diabetes Care. 2001 Jun;24(6):1069-78
pubmed: 11375373
Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2655-61
pubmed: 16249535
Am J Public Health. 1994 Nov;84(11):1768-74
pubmed: 7977915
Heart Lung. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):315-23
pubmed: 16963363
Obes Rev. 2001 Aug;2(3):173-82
pubmed: 12120102
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):111-21
pubmed: 11790062
Eff Clin Pract. 1998 Aug-Sep;1(1):2-4
pubmed: 10345255
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1:S62-9
pubmed: 20042775
J Psychosom Res. 1999 May;46(5):425-35
pubmed: 10404477
Med Care. 1994 Dec;32(12):1173-81
pubmed: 7967857
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(5):365-74
pubmed: 16955622
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 15;118(8):622-9
pubmed: 8452328
Med Care. 2007 Sep;45(9):820-34
pubmed: 17712252
Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Jun;14(6):491
pubmed: 24743941
Manag Care Q. 1996 Spring;4(2):12-25
pubmed: 10157259
N Engl J Med. 1989 May 4;320(18):1183-7
pubmed: 2710191
CMAJ. 2006 Jul 4;175(1):42-6
pubmed: 16818907
Psychosom Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;58(2):99-110
pubmed: 8849624
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23(1):77-80
pubmed: 18030539
Diabetologia. 2006 Nov;49(11):2627-33
pubmed: 17019601
Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;1:47
pubmed: 23075379
Int J Integr Care. 2012 Oct 01;12:e194
pubmed: 23593054