Simulation of the biomechanical effects induced by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for different levels of ablation in normal corneas.
Journal
Eye (London, England)
ISSN: 1476-5454
Titre abrégé: Eye (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
09
12
2019
accepted:
02
06
2020
revised:
01
06
2020
pubmed:
18
6
2020
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
18
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To employ a finite element (FE) stress model to simulate laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery and its biomechanical consequences. The basic geometrical model we used for the cornea was patient-specific on which we manually incorporated seven simulations: three simulations evaluating the effect of a 120, 140 and 180 μm flap (without ablation); three simulations evaluating ablation depths of 40, 80 and 120 μm (with a 120 μm flap); and one control model, without any simulated surgical intervention. In all simulations, stress values were greatest in the centre of the cornea. Furthermore, when comparing the different treatments, stress values were highest in the cornea with the deepest ablation, and were lowest in the non-treated cornea. Specifically, peak effective stresses were 0.031, 0.028 and 0.025 MPa in 120, 80 and 40 µm ablation depths, respectively. In our model, the depth of tissue penetration using ablation or flap creation was correlated with tissue loads-the thinner the residual stromal bed is, the greater are the stresses occurring as a result of the same IOP. We based our model geometry on patient specific scans, allowing for customisation of the treatment to the patient's corneal structure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32546746
doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1017-7
pii: 10.1038/s41433-020-1017-7
pmc: PMC8027645
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
996-1001Références
Lam K, Rootman DB, Lichtinger A, Rootman DS. Post-LASIK ectasia treated with intrastromal corneal ring segments and corneal crosslinking. IGIT J Ophthalmol. 2013;19:1–8.
Santhiago MR, Smadja D, Gomes BF, Mello GR, Monteiro ML, Wilson SE, et al. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:87–95.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.002
Tatar MG, Kantarci FA, Yildirim A, Uslu H, Colak HN, Goker H, et al. Risk factors in post-LASIK corneal ectasia. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:204191.
doi: 10.1155/2014/204191
Said A, Hamade IH, Tabbara KF. Late onset corneal ectasia after LASIK surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011;25:225–30.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.05.003
Dawson DG, Randleman JB, Grossniklaus HE, O’Brien TP, Dubovy SR, Schmack I, et al. Corneal ectasia after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: histopathology, ultrastructure, and pathophysiology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:2181–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.008
Yazici AT, Kara N, Yüksel K, Altinkaynak H, Baz O, Bozkurt E, et al. The biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Eye. 2011;25:1005–9.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.99
Asher R, Gefen A, Moisseiev E, Varssano D. Etiology of keratoconus: proposed biomechanical pathogenesis. Silico Cell Tissue Sci. 2014a;1:3.
doi: 10.1186/2196-050X-1-3
Simpleware® Ltd. ScanIP, +FE, +NURBS and +CAD Reference Guide ver. 5.1, 2012. http://www.simpleware.com/software/ .
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with very high frequency ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:571–81.
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080601-05
Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:46–52.
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(88)80063-4
Thomasy SM, Raghunathan VK, Winkler M, Reilly CM, Sadeli AR, Russell P, et al. Elastic modulus and collagen organization of the rabbit cornea: epithelium to endothelium. Acta Biomater. 2013;10:785–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.025
Kniestedt C, Punjabi O, Lin S, Stamper RL. Tonometry through the ages. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:568–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.024
Maas SA, Ellis BJ, Ateshian GA, Weiss JA. FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:5–11.
doi: 10.1115/1.4005694
Asher R, Gefen A, Moisseiev E, Varssano D. An analytical approach to corneal mechanics for determining practical, clinically-meaningful patient-specific tissue mechanical properties in the rehabilitation of vision. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014b;43:274–86.
doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1147-9
Sinha Roy A, Dupps WJ Jr, Roberts CJ. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:971–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.065
Dupps WJ Jr, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:709–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.03.015