Gambling Phenotypes in Online Sports Betting.
clustering
gambling disorder
internet
online sports betting
phenotype
Journal
Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
24
02
2020
accepted:
12
05
2020
entrez:
18
6
2020
pubmed:
18
6
2020
medline:
18
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Internet provides easy access to multiple types of gambling and has led to changes in betting habits. A severe rise in problematic gambling has been predicted among all sectors of the population, and studies are required to assess the emerging phenotypes related to the new structures of gambling activities. This study aimed to explore the existence of latent classes associated with gambling habits among treatment-seeking gamblers due to Online Sports Betting (OSB). Initial sample included The prevalence of OSB as a main type of gambling problem in the study was 7.2% (95% confidence interval: 6.4 to 7.9%). Two latent clusters were identified, with differences in sociodemographics and clinical status. Cluster 1 ( The increasing understanding of latent classes underlying OSB phenotypes is essential in guiding the development of reliable screening tools to identify individuals highly vulnerable to addictive behaviors among Internet gamblers, as well as in planning prevention and treatment initiatives focused on the precise profiles of these patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The Internet provides easy access to multiple types of gambling and has led to changes in betting habits. A severe rise in problematic gambling has been predicted among all sectors of the population, and studies are required to assess the emerging phenotypes related to the new structures of gambling activities. This study aimed to explore the existence of latent classes associated with gambling habits among treatment-seeking gamblers due to Online Sports Betting (OSB).
METHOD
METHODS
Initial sample included
RESULTS
RESULTS
The prevalence of OSB as a main type of gambling problem in the study was 7.2% (95% confidence interval: 6.4 to 7.9%). Two latent clusters were identified, with differences in sociodemographics and clinical status. Cluster 1 (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The increasing understanding of latent classes underlying OSB phenotypes is essential in guiding the development of reliable screening tools to identify individuals highly vulnerable to addictive behaviors among Internet gamblers, as well as in planning prevention and treatment initiatives focused on the precise profiles of these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32547432
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00482
pmc: PMC7270333
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
482Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Granero, Jiménez-Murcia, del Pino-Gutiérrez, Mora, Mendoza-Valenciano, Baenas-Soto, Gómez-Peña, Moragas, Codina, López-González, Mena-Moreno, Mestre-Bach, Valero-Solís, Rivas, Agüera, Vintró-Alcaraz, Lozano-Madrid, Menchón and Fernández-Aranda.
Références
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):134-46
pubmed: 25747926
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Mar-Apr;37(2):217-29
pubmed: 24370209
Behav Neurosci. 2014 Oct;128(5):556-66
pubmed: 24911320
Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Jan-Feb;47(1):18-24
pubmed: 22012847
Addict Behav. 2019 Aug;95:152-159
pubmed: 30925439
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 15;15:86
pubmed: 25886577
J Behav Addict. 2013 Mar;2(1):31-41
pubmed: 26165769
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Jun;28(2):396-403
pubmed: 23915365
J Behav Addict. 2016 Dec;5(4):592-613
pubmed: 27784180
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018 May 7;14:399-423
pubmed: 29734827
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Dec;15(12):688-92
pubmed: 23083322
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 29;9:6
pubmed: 29434553
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Apr 28;2013:416981
pubmed: 23710139
Addiction. 2002 Jun;97(6):745-53
pubmed: 12084144
Psychol Methods. 2012 Jun;17(2):137-52
pubmed: 22545595
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 24;7:e7958
pubmed: 31660279
J Gambl Stud. 2009 Mar;25(1):93-104
pubmed: 18592357
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):416-424
pubmed: 28849669
Addiction. 2013 Apr;108(4):789-98
pubmed: 23072599
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 05;11(8):e0160028
pubmed: 27494401
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):825-47
pubmed: 24863627
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013 Jul 01;8:24
pubmed: 23816162
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):396-405
pubmed: 28838248
Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2(2):185-193
pubmed: 26500834
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Sep;26(3):527-35
pubmed: 22686960
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec;31(4):1201-14
pubmed: 25424057
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):469-90
pubmed: 22057662
Neuropsychol Rev. 2019 Mar;29(1):14-26
pubmed: 30927147
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;28(3):769-79
pubmed: 24865462
Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1709-1715
pubmed: 28198052
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Jul 15;288:79-93
pubmed: 25907745
Front Psychol. 2015 May 27;6:655
pubmed: 26074835
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):8-15
pubmed: 14963776
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;160(1):180-2
pubmed: 12505822
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):868-77
pubmed: 24059836
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;11(3):456-70
pubmed: 26481371
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 07;17(1):e13
pubmed: 25567672
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Mar;31(1):1-15
pubmed: 23934369
J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):639-647
pubmed: 29076354
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Sep;24(3):321-35
pubmed: 18317888
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Dec;27(4):1092-101
pubmed: 23438251
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1010:21-41
pubmed: 29098666
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Sep;26(3):361-72
pubmed: 20084433
Front Psychol. 2017 May 15;8:779
pubmed: 28555121
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 07;8:53
pubmed: 28439243