Randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes with and without the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.


Journal

Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
ISSN: 0970-1591
Titre abrégé: Indian J Urol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 8510441

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 09 01 2020
revised: 13 02 2020
accepted: 28 02 2020
entrez: 19 6 2020
pubmed: 19 6 2020
medline: 19 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Very few randomized controlled trials are available globally to support routine use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol after radical cystectomy (RC), and none so far has been conducted in the Indian subcontinent. The aim of the present study was to evaluate hospital stay and 30-day perioperative outcomes following RC with the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Fifty-four patients undergoing open RC were randomized to ERAS versus conventional surgical care (CSC) at our center from April 2017 to May 2018. Key interventions included avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, early nasogastric tube removal, early enteral feeding, and early obligatory ambulation. Follow-up was done till 30-day postoperatively or till discharge, whichever longer. Twenty-seven patients in each group were analyzed. The demographic profile of the groups was similar. Length of stay in each group (8 days [5-57] ERAS vs. 9 days [5-31] CSC group, ERAS protocol leads to faster bowel recovery compared to conventional care in patients undergoing open RC but fails to demonstrate a shorter length of stay and lower complication rate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32549659
doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_11_20
pii: IJU-36-95
pmc: PMC7279092
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

95-100

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Urology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):990-4; quiz 1235
pubmed: 20643429
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 28;24(4):519-536
pubmed: 29398873
Clin Nutr. 2013 Dec;32(6):879-87
pubmed: 24189391
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):164-74
pubmed: 18675501
Urol Oncol. 2016 Mar;34(3):120.e17-21
pubmed: 26585947
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2012-6
pubmed: 11956429
Eur Urol. 2009 Apr;55(4):815-25
pubmed: 19157687
Urology. 2016 Oct;96:69-73
pubmed: 27402372
J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1209-13
pubmed: 26021824
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):41-50
pubmed: 29080948
Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):552-9
pubmed: 25733265
World J Urol. 2017 Jun;35(6):907-911
pubmed: 27734131
J Urol. 2014 Mar;191(3):619-25
pubmed: 24036234
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):215-220
pubmed: 29116394

Auteurs

Devanshu Bansal (D)

Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology and Renal Transplant, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Brusabhanu Nayak (B)

Department of Urology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Prabhjot Singh (P)

Department of Urology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Rishi Nayyar (R)

Department of Urology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Rashmi Ramachandran (R)

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Rajeev Kumar (R)

Department of Urology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Amlesh Seth (A)

Department of Urology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Classifications MeSH