Bone Loss Following Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture.
Bone loss
Clinical outcome
DEXA
Elderly
Gruen
Periprosthetic fracture
Journal
Indian journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0019-5413
Titre abrégé: Indian J Orthop
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137736
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
24
05
2019
accepted:
27
08
2019
entrez:
19
6
2020
pubmed:
19
6
2020
medline:
19
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the advances in medicine, an increasing number of the ageing population are a public health concern in terms of age-related complications. Among them, displaced neck fractures often require surgical intervention or arthroplasty to achieve the mobilization of the elderly and good life quality. The aim of the study is to monitor the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around the femoral stem and the effects on functional outcomes in patients treated with cementless hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fracture. Seventy-one patients aged 70 years or older who were treated with cementless hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture were prospectively followed for 2 years. The percent change in the periprosthetic BMD in each Gruen zone was compared to the baseline using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Demographic factors [age, body mass index (BMI), and sex] that could possibly influence BMD and the clinical outcome were evaluated. Fifty-one patients were available for the final follow-up. The mean age was 76.5 (range 70-89) years. The mean BMI was 28.9 (range 22.7-37.2). The mean Harris hip score at the final follow-up was 84.3 (range 72-93). There was a significant decrease in BMD in all Gruen zones ( Cementless hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients achieves a good clinical outcome despite significant bone loss around the femoral stem. The reduction in BMD is more pronounced in the metaphyseal region.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With the advances in medicine, an increasing number of the ageing population are a public health concern in terms of age-related complications. Among them, displaced neck fractures often require surgical intervention or arthroplasty to achieve the mobilization of the elderly and good life quality. The aim of the study is to monitor the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around the femoral stem and the effects on functional outcomes in patients treated with cementless hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Seventy-one patients aged 70 years or older who were treated with cementless hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture were prospectively followed for 2 years. The percent change in the periprosthetic BMD in each Gruen zone was compared to the baseline using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Demographic factors [age, body mass index (BMI), and sex] that could possibly influence BMD and the clinical outcome were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fifty-one patients were available for the final follow-up. The mean age was 76.5 (range 70-89) years. The mean BMI was 28.9 (range 22.7-37.2). The mean Harris hip score at the final follow-up was 84.3 (range 72-93). There was a significant decrease in BMD in all Gruen zones (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Cementless hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients achieves a good clinical outcome despite significant bone loss around the femoral stem. The reduction in BMD is more pronounced in the metaphyseal region.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32549960
doi: 10.1007/s43465-019-00009-1
pii: 9
pmc: PMC7270220
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
454-462Informations de copyright
© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Int Orthop. 2012 Aug;36(8):1549-60
pubmed: 22623062
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Sep;83(9):1032-45
pubmed: 18775204
J Orthop Res. 2015 Apr;33(4):504-12
pubmed: 25663278
Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(3):261-4
pubmed: 10824243
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017 May-Aug;14(2):189-196
pubmed: 29263732
Injury. 2013 Sep;44 Suppl 3:S62-6
pubmed: 24060022
Acta Orthop. 2018 Feb;89(1):23-28
pubmed: 29037093
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S352-S354
pubmed: 30852066
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):2122-30
pubmed: 16140828
Acta Orthop. 2019 Jun;90(3):270-274
pubmed: 30931662
Bone Joint J. 2014 Apr;96-B(4):455-61
pubmed: 24692610
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):665-77
pubmed: 21511934
Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1137-42
pubmed: 22127382
Med Sci Monit. 2009 Nov;15(11):BR307-12
pubmed: 19865047
Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):321-4
pubmed: 21504344
Indian J Orthop. 2011 May;45(3):236-42
pubmed: 21559103
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):421-431
pubmed: 28385929
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 Aug;126(6):380-6
pubmed: 16557369
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):473-8
pubmed: 7744940
Hip Int. 2019 Mar;29(2):177-183
pubmed: 29682992
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jun;(141):17-27
pubmed: 477100
Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Sep;53(3):158-61
pubmed: 8242466
Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):396-402
pubmed: 24954490
Injury. 2010 Apr;41(4):370-3
pubmed: 19879576
Adv Orthop. 2016;2016:8079354
pubmed: 27999686
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Jan;53(1):19-23
pubmed: 30583822