Shortening of low-flow duration over time was associated with improved outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in in-hospital cardiac arrest.
Cardiac arrest
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)
Low-flow duration (LFD)
Rapid response system (RRS)
Journal
Journal of intensive care
ISSN: 2052-0492
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
accepted:
04
06
2020
entrez:
19
6
2020
pubmed:
19
6
2020
medline:
19
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quality improvement in the administration of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) over time and its association with low-flow duration (LFD) and outcomes of cardiac arrest (CA) have been insufficiently investigated. In this study, we hypothesized that quality improvement in efforts to shorten the duration of initiating ECPR had decreased LFD over the last 15 years of experience at an academic tertiary care hospital, which in turn improved the outcomes of in-hospital CA (IHCA). This was a single-center retrospective observational study of ECPR patients between January 2003 and December 2017. A rapid response system (RRS) and an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program were initiated in 2011 and 2013. First, the association of LFD per minute with the 90-day mortality and neurological outcome was analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Then, the temporal changes in LFD were investigated. Of 175 study subjects who received ECPR, 117 had IHCA. In the multivariate logistic regression, IHCA patients with shorter LFD experienced significantly increased 90-day survival and favorable neurological outcomes (LFD per minute, 90-day survival: odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94-1.00, A shorter LFD was associated with increased 90-day survival and favorable neurological outcomes of IHCA patients who received ECPR. The quality improvement in administering ECPR over time, including the RRS program and the ECMO program, appeared to ameliorate clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32549988
doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00457-0
pii: 457
pmc: PMC7294673
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
39Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Resuscitation. 2018 Nov;132:47-55
pubmed: 30171974
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168729
pubmed: 28030644
Acute Med Surg. 2015 Mar 17;2(4):244-249
pubmed: 29123731
JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):223-4
pubmed: 26132709
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;95(6):2140-6; discussion 2146-7
pubmed: 23506632
Crit Care Med. 2002 Apr;30(4 Suppl):S140-4
pubmed: 11940789
Circulation. 1991 Aug;84(2):960-75
pubmed: 1860248
Circulation. 2004 Nov 23;110(21):3385-97
pubmed: 15557386
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13257
pubmed: 30508912
Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11 Suppl):S241-8
pubmed: 20837920
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;15(9):856-60
pubmed: 25162513
Lancet. 2008 Aug 16;372(9638):554-61
pubmed: 18603291
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Feb;34(2):146-155
pubmed: 29249614
Circulation. 2012 Dec 11;126(24):2834-43
pubmed: 23035209
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1527-32
pubmed: 25201611
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:5-10
pubmed: 28267618
Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:1-12
pubmed: 31129229
Resuscitation. 2014 Sep;85(9):1219-24
pubmed: 24992872
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:62-70
pubmed: 29020604