Using qualitative approaches to improve quantitative inferences in environmental psychology.
Community-based research
Focus groups
Mixed methods
Journal
MethodsX
ISSN: 2215-0161
Titre abrégé: MethodsX
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101639829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
21
02
2020
accepted:
22
05
2020
entrez:
20
6
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
20
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This article describes the qualitative approach used to generate and interpret the quantitative study reported by Song and colleagues' (2020) in their article, "What counts as an 'environmental' issue? Differences in environmental issue conceptualization across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status." Song and colleagues (2020) describe the results of a survey documenting that, in the United States, White and high-SES respondents perceive environmental issues differently than their non-White and lower-SES counterparts, reflecting structural differences in environmental risks. While Song and colleagues (2020) discuss the survey results in detail, the discussion of the qualitative research that led to the creation of that survey was limited due to space constraints. The current article provides a more holistic account of the methods behind the Song and colleagues (2020) study by discussing the qualitative component of the research in detail. In addition to discussing how the qualitative research complements and critically informs the findings reported by Song et al., we also consider the broader implications and value of integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in environmental psychology.•Conduct qualitative study to inform quantitative design.•Use qualitative patterns to make inferences about quantitative indicators.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32551245
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100943
pii: S2215-0161(20)30163-1
pii: 100943
pmc: PMC7289758
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100943Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Popul Environ. 2010 Jan;31(1-3):20-42
pubmed: 20440381
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):e565
pubmed: 31007726
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1123-1128
pubmed: 28853993
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;10(6):697-700
pubmed: 26581720
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):12429-12434
pubmed: 30373835
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):12334-12336
pubmed: 30459271
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Mar;114(3):386-93
pubmed: 16507462
Health Commun. 2020 Apr 23;:1-8
pubmed: 32323571