Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.
driver acceptance
driver distraction
haptic shared control
lane keeping
truck driving
Journal
Human factors
ISSN: 1547-8181
Titre abrégé: Hum Factors
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aims to compare the effectiveness and subjective acceptance of three designs for haptic lane-keeping assistance in truck driving. Haptic lane-keeping assistance provides steering torques toward a reference trajectory, either continuously or only when exceeding a bandwidth. These approaches have been previously investigated in driving simulators, but it is unclear how these generalize toward real-life truck driving. Three haptic lane-keeping algorithms to assist truck drivers were evaluated on a 6.3-km-long oval-shaped test track: (1) a single-bandwidth (SB) algorithm, which activated assistance torques when the predicted lateral deviation from lane center exceeded 0.4 m; (2) a double-bandwidth (DB) algorithm, which activated as SB, but deactivated after returning within 0.15 m lateral deviation; and (3) an algorithm providing assistance torques continuously (Cont) toward the lane center. Fifteen participants drove four trials each, one trial without and one for each haptic assistance design. Furthermore, participants drove with and without a concurrent visually distracting task. Compared to unsupported driving, all three assistance systems provided similar safety benefits in terms of decreased absolute lateral position and number of lane departures. Participants reported higher satisfaction and usability for Cont compared to SB. The continuous assistance was better accepted than bandwidth assistance, a finding consistent with prior driving simulator research. Research is still needed to investigate the long-term effects of haptic assistance on reliance and after-effects. The present results are useful for designers of haptic lane-keeping assistance, as driver acceptance and performance are determinants of reliance and safety, respectively.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to compare the effectiveness and subjective acceptance of three designs for haptic lane-keeping assistance in truck driving.
BACKGROUND
Haptic lane-keeping assistance provides steering torques toward a reference trajectory, either continuously or only when exceeding a bandwidth. These approaches have been previously investigated in driving simulators, but it is unclear how these generalize toward real-life truck driving.
METHOD
Three haptic lane-keeping algorithms to assist truck drivers were evaluated on a 6.3-km-long oval-shaped test track: (1) a single-bandwidth (SB) algorithm, which activated assistance torques when the predicted lateral deviation from lane center exceeded 0.4 m; (2) a double-bandwidth (DB) algorithm, which activated as SB, but deactivated after returning within 0.15 m lateral deviation; and (3) an algorithm providing assistance torques continuously (Cont) toward the lane center. Fifteen participants drove four trials each, one trial without and one for each haptic assistance design. Furthermore, participants drove with and without a concurrent visually distracting task.
RESULTS
Compared to unsupported driving, all three assistance systems provided similar safety benefits in terms of decreased absolute lateral position and number of lane departures. Participants reported higher satisfaction and usability for Cont compared to SB.
CONCLUSION
The continuous assistance was better accepted than bandwidth assistance, a finding consistent with prior driving simulator research. Research is still needed to investigate the long-term effects of haptic assistance on reliance and after-effects.
APPLICATION
The present results are useful for designers of haptic lane-keeping assistance, as driver acceptance and performance are determinants of reliance and safety, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32551951
doi: 10.1177/0018720820928622
pmc: PMC8593280
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1380-1395Références
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80
pubmed: 15151155
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:338-46
pubmed: 22763402
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014 Jul-Sep;7(3):324-33
pubmed: 25248215
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:628-34
pubmed: 22836114
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):786-98
pubmed: 23156623
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Jun;11(3):270-8
pubmed: 20544571
Hum Factors. 2008 Apr;50(2):264-75
pubmed: 18516837
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 May;42(3):904-12
pubmed: 20380919
Hum Factors. 2009 Feb;51(1):102-10
pubmed: 19634313
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):5-20
pubmed: 25790567
J Safety Res. 2015 Feb;52:59-63
pubmed: 25662883
Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):574-90
pubmed: 16435698
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 17;18(2):225-229
pubmed: 27624313
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):467-79
pubmed: 26683254
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:218-25
pubmed: 22727884
Hum Factors. 2014 Jun;56(4):789-808
pubmed: 25029903