Event-Free Survival, a Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Composite End Point, Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation.
Aged
Disease Progression
Endpoint Determination
Humans
Kallikreins
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Predictive Value of Tests
Progression-Free Survival
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 09 2020
10 09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
25
2
2021
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, we have shown that metastasis-free survival is a strong surrogate for overall survival (OS) in men with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer and can accelerate the evaluation of new (neo)adjuvant therapies. Event-free survival (EFS), an earlier prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based composite end point, may further expedite trial completion. EFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of first evidence of disease recurrence, including biochemical failure, local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, or was censored at the date of last PSA assessment. Individual patient data from trials within the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate-ICECaP-database with evaluable PSA and disease follow-up data were analyzed. We evaluated the surrogacy of EFS for OS using a 2-stage meta-analytic validation model by determining the correlation of EFS with OS (patient level) and the correlation of treatment effects (hazard ratios [HRs]) on both EFS and OS (trial level). A clinically relevant surrogacy was defined a priori as an Data for 10,350 patients were analyzed from 15 radiation therapy-based trials enrolled from 1987 to 2011 with a median follow-up of 10 years. At the patient level, the correlation of EFS with OS was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.44) as measured by Kendall's tau from a copula model. At the trial level, the EFS is a weak surrogate for OS and is not suitable for use as an intermediate clinical end point to substitute for OS to accelerate phase III (neo)adjuvant trials of prostate cancer therapies for primary radiation therapy-based trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32552276
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03114
pmc: PMC8265328
doi:
Substances chimiques
KLK3 protein, human
EC 3.4.21.-
Kallikreins
EC 3.4.21.-
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3032-3041Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):967-987
pubmed: 30342843
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4;381(1):13-24
pubmed: 31150574
Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54
pubmed: 20888992
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):417-428
pubmed: 28146658
JAMA. 2008 Jan 23;299(3):289-95
pubmed: 18212313
Lancet. 2016 Mar 19;387(10024):1163-77
pubmed: 26719232
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Oct;13(10):983-92
pubmed: 22995653
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jul;30(3):312-24
pubmed: 25308694
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):144-146
pubmed: 30612936
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):213-221
pubmed: 30526194
Lancet. 2002 Jul 13;360(9327):103-6
pubmed: 12126818
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Dec;1(6):449-458
pubmed: 31158087
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):189-95
pubmed: 22112793
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Sep;22(3):420-427
pubmed: 30643173
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 18;369(3):213-23
pubmed: 23863050
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):152-60
pubmed: 25601341
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42
pubmed: 24597866
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 10;36(11):1080-1087
pubmed: 29384722
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):121-131
pubmed: 31157964
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1642-9
pubmed: 19903805
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):496-504
pubmed: 25922274
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):652-658
pubmed: 28097317
Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):451-9
pubmed: 21440505
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):424-33
pubmed: 24881730
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1765-71
pubmed: 17470867
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-351
pubmed: 28578639
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jun 1;10(11):3927-33
pubmed: 15173102
Stat Med. 2010 Aug 15;29(18):1875-89
pubmed: 20680981
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30
pubmed: 26742998
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 20;35(27):3097-3104
pubmed: 28796587
JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1591-7
pubmed: 10235151
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 31;337(5):295-300
pubmed: 9233866
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1502-12
pubmed: 15470213
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):411-22
pubmed: 20818862
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367(10):895-903
pubmed: 22931259
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):352-360
pubmed: 28578607
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 25;107(12):djv261
pubmed: 26409187