Ultrasound-Guided Fibrin Glue Injection for Treatment of Iatrogenic Femoral Pseudoaneurysms.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aneurysm, False
/ diagnostic imaging
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
/ adverse effects
Feasibility Studies
Female
Femoral Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Fibrin Tissue Adhesive
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Iatrogenic Disease
Injections, Intra-Arterial
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Vascular System Injuries
/ diagnostic imaging
femoral artery
fibrin glue
iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm
ultrasound-guided intervention
Journal
Vascular and endovascular surgery
ISSN: 1938-9116
Titre abrégé: Vasc Endovascular Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101136421
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Arterial pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) are the most common access site complication following transarterial catheter intervention. Ultrasound-guided injection of thrombogenic substances into perfused arterial PSAs followed by compression therapy is a well-established and less invasive treatment option than surgical repair. Different agents are available to induce thrombosis including thrombin and a fibrin-based tissue glue, which is used as first-line treatment at our institution. This paper deals with our experience using ultrasound-guided fibrin glue injection (UGFI). Retrospective data analysis: all patients (55) treated for iatrogenic femoral PSA following digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018, were included. Data on epidemiology, PSA location and size, vascular risk factors, fibrin glue injection (fibrin glue volume), primary success rate of UFGI, and complications related to the treatment were analyzed. A total of 55 consecutive femoral iatrogenic PSAs were treated during the defined period and 32 (58.2%) of the patients were female. Imaging was performed using ultrasound in all cases. The most common PSA location (80.0%) was the common femoral artery, mean PSA size (± SD) was 2.7 ± 1.2 cm, and neck length was 1.6 ± 1.0 cm. The dose (mean ± SD) of fibrin glue was 2.6 mL (± 1.0; maximum: 6 mL). Primary UGFI success rate was 87.3% and conversion rate to open surgery was 12.7%. Two (4%) patients required embolectomy for peripheral embolization after UGFI. Early results achieved with UGFI for treatment of iatrogenic femoral PSA are promising. In our cohort, UGFI was a safe and effective first-line alternative to traditional open surgery, which then was unnecessary in the vast majority of PSA cases. Further prospective studies for comparison of ultrasound-guided techniques should be encouraged.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32552570
doi: 10.1177/1538574420934631
pmc: PMC7346712
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fibrin Tissue Adhesive
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
497-503Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 May;150(5):1177-80
pubmed: 3282407
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Jan 24;131(3):356-61
pubmed: 18192040
Eur Radiol. 2003 Jan;13(1):209-12
pubmed: 12541131
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Apr;58(2):278-283
pubmed: 28004900
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Oct;36(4):779-82
pubmed: 12368739
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20170538
pubmed: 29470097
Br J Radiol. 2001 Aug;74(884):690-4
pubmed: 11511492
Vasa. 2018 Apr;47(3):177-185
pubmed: 29439611
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;51(6):815-23
pubmed: 27026390
Radiology. 1995 May;195(2):463-6
pubmed: 7724767
World J Surg. 2011 Apr;35(4):911-6
pubmed: 21264468
Radiology. 1991 Mar;178(3):671-5
pubmed: 1994400
J Vasc Surg. 1997 May;25(5):803-8; discussion 808-9
pubmed: 9152307
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Dec;173(6):1567-73
pubmed: 10584803
J Endovasc Ther. 2004 Oct;11(5):570-6
pubmed: 15482031
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:121-127
pubmed: 28887253
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 29;(11):CD004981
pubmed: 24293322
J Clin Ultrasound. 2016 Mar-Apr;44(3):188-95
pubmed: 26179719
J Card Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):480-5
pubmed: 14992096
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Aug;51(6):368-372
pubmed: 28560886
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jun 15;93(12):1540-2
pubmed: 15194031
World J Radiol. 2015 May 28;7(5):89-99
pubmed: 26029351
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jul;56(1):134-41
pubmed: 22633423
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Sep;78(5):473-5
pubmed: 8881736
J Vasc Surg. 1994 Apr;19(4):683-6
pubmed: 8164284
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Sep;30(3):670-5
pubmed: 9283524
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):TC04-TC06
pubmed: 28571227
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8S):41-43
pubmed: 29804798
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Aug;42(2):230-5
pubmed: 21498092
Radiology. 2000 Jan;214(1):127-31
pubmed: 10644111
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004 Nov-Dec;27(6):612-5
pubmed: 15578137
Am Surg. 1994 Feb;60(2):132-7
pubmed: 8304645
Clin Radiol. 2000 Oct;55(10):749-51
pubmed: 11052874
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Jul;81(4):226-34
pubmed: 10615187
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(2):207-15
pubmed: 24692534
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):1104-10
pubmed: 16055694