Comparison of morphological features in lymph node metastasis between pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.


Journal

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1424-3911
Titre abrégé: Pancreatology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100966936

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 02 03 2020
revised: 04 05 2020
accepted: 19 05 2020
pubmed: 20 6 2020
medline: 10 7 2021
entrez: 20 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Various studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the use of lymph node size for the prediction of metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Further, there is even less information in pNENs. Thus, the clinical accuracy and utility of using lymph node size to predict lymph node metastasis in pNENs has not been fully elucidated OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine differences in lymph node morphology between pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) to create more accurate diagnostic criteria for lymph node metastasis. We assessed 2139 lymph nodes, 773 from pNEN specimens and 1366 from PDAC specimens, surgically resected at our institute between 1994 and 2016. We evaluated the number, shape, size, and presence of metastasis. Sixty-eight lymph nodes from 16 pNEN patients and 109 lymph nodes from 33 PDAC patients were metastatic. There were more lymph nodes sampled per case in the PDAC group than in the pNEN group (31.8 vs. 18.0). Metastatic lymph nodes in pNEN patients were larger and rounder than those in PDAC patients (minor axis: 5.15 mm vs. 3.11 mm; minor axis/major axis ratio: 0.701 vs. 0.626). The correlation between lymph node size and metastasis was stronger in pNENs (r = 0.974) than in PDACs (r = 0.439). Lymph node status and morphology are affected by differences in tumor histology. The lymph node minor axis is a reliable parameter for the prediction of lymph node metastasis and has more utility as a predictive marker in pNENs than in PDACs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Various studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the use of lymph node size for the prediction of metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Further, there is even less information in pNENs. Thus, the clinical accuracy and utility of using lymph node size to predict lymph node metastasis in pNENs has not been fully elucidated OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine differences in lymph node morphology between pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) to create more accurate diagnostic criteria for lymph node metastasis.
METHODS METHODS
We assessed 2139 lymph nodes, 773 from pNEN specimens and 1366 from PDAC specimens, surgically resected at our institute between 1994 and 2016. We evaluated the number, shape, size, and presence of metastasis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Sixty-eight lymph nodes from 16 pNEN patients and 109 lymph nodes from 33 PDAC patients were metastatic. There were more lymph nodes sampled per case in the PDAC group than in the pNEN group (31.8 vs. 18.0). Metastatic lymph nodes in pNEN patients were larger and rounder than those in PDAC patients (minor axis: 5.15 mm vs. 3.11 mm; minor axis/major axis ratio: 0.701 vs. 0.626). The correlation between lymph node size and metastasis was stronger in pNENs (r = 0.974) than in PDACs (r = 0.439).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Lymph node status and morphology are affected by differences in tumor histology. The lymph node minor axis is a reliable parameter for the prediction of lymph node metastasis and has more utility as a predictive marker in pNENs than in PDACs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32553561
pii: S1424-3903(20)30164-2
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

936-943

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Daigoro Takahashi (D)

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Motohiro Kojima (M)

Division of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan. Electronic address: mokojima@east.ncc.go.jp.

Ryo Morisue (R)

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Motokazu Sugimoto (M)

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Shin Kobayashi (S)

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Shinichiro Takahashi (S)

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Masaru Konishi (M)

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Naoto Gotohda (N)

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Masafumi Ikeda (M)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Atsushi Ochiai (A)

Division of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH