What happens to drug use and expenditure when cost sharing is completely removed? Evidence from a Canadian provincial public drug plan.
Canada
Cost sharing
Drug policy
Interrupted time series
Journal
Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-6054
Titre abrégé: Health Policy
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8409431
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
11
10
2018
revised:
06
03
2020
accepted:
05
05
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of cost-sharing for medicines is under active policy discussion, including in proposals for value-based insurance design. To inform this debate, we estimated the impact of completely removing cost-sharing on medication use and expenditure using a quasi-experimental approach. Fair PharmaCare, British Columbia's income-based public drug plan, includes a household out-of-pocket limit. Therefore, when one household member starts a long-term high-cost drug surpassing this maximum, cost-sharing is completely removed for other family members. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate monthly prescriptions and expenditures of other household members, 24 months before and after cost-sharing removal. We studied 2191 household members newly free of cost-sharing requirements, most of whom had lower incomes. R emoving cost-sharing increased the level of drug expenditure and prescription numbers by 16 and 19%, respectively (i.e. $2659.43 (95%$1507.27-$3811.59, p < 0.001); 50.0 (95%CI 25.1-74.9, p < 0.001)) relative to prior expenditures and utilization without changing pre-existing trends. Much of this change was driven by 533 individuals initiating medication for the first time after cost-sharing removal. This initiation substantially increased average expenditure, especially for antiviral agents. Completely removing cost-sharing, independent of health status, significantly increased medication use and expenditure particularly due to medicine initiation by new users. While costs may be preventing use, the appropriateness of additional use, especially among new users, is unclear.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32553741
pii: S0168-8510(18)30587-6
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.001
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pharmaceutical Preparations
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
977-983Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Michael Law has consulted for Health Canada and acted as an expert witness for the Attorney General of Canada. Muhammad Mamdani has served as an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann–La Roche Limited, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer Canada Inc. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.