Simulator Pre-Screening of Underprepared Drivers Prior to Licensing On-Road Examination: Clustering of Virtual Driving Test Time Series Data.
accidents, traffic
adolescent
automobile driving
cause of death
child
humans
licensure
machine learning
motor vehicle
motor vehicles
on-road exam
simulated driving assessment
support vector machines
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 06 2020
18 06 2020
Historique:
received:
12
03
2019
accepted:
16
12
2019
revised:
11
11
2019
entrez:
20
6
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A large Midwestern state commissioned a virtual driving test (VDT) to assess driving skills preparedness before the on-road examination (ORE). Since July 2017, a pilot deployment of the VDT in state licensing centers (VDT pilot) has collected both VDT and ORE data from new license applicants with the aim of creating a scoring algorithm that could predict those who were underprepared. Leveraging data collected from the VDT pilot, this study aimed to develop and conduct an initial evaluation of a novel machine learning (ML)-based classifier using limited domain knowledge and minimal feature engineering to reliably predict applicant pass/fail on the ORE. Such methods, if proven useful, could be applicable to the classification of other time series data collected within medical and other settings. We analyzed an initial dataset that comprised 4308 drivers who completed both the VDT and the ORE, in which 1096 (25.4%) drivers went on to fail the ORE. We studied 2 different approaches to constructing feature sets to use as input to ML algorithms: the standard method of reducing the time series data to a set of manually defined variables that summarize driving behavior and a novel approach using time series clustering. We then fed these representations into different ML algorithms to compare their ability to predict a driver's ORE outcome (pass/fail). The new method using time series clustering performed similarly compared with the standard method in terms of overall accuracy for predicting pass or fail outcome (76.1% vs 76.2%) and area under the curve (0.656 vs 0.682). However, the time series clustering slightly outperformed the standard method in differentially predicting failure on the ORE. The novel clustering method yielded a risk ratio for failure of 3.07 (95% CI 2.75-3.43), whereas the standard variables method yielded a risk ratio for failure of 2.68 (95% CI 2.41-2.99). In addition, the time series clustering method with logistic regression produced the lowest ratio of false alarms (those who were predicted to fail but went on to pass the ORE; 27.2%). Our results provide initial evidence that the clustering method is useful for feature construction in classification tasks involving time series data when resources are limited to create multiple, domain-relevant variables.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A large Midwestern state commissioned a virtual driving test (VDT) to assess driving skills preparedness before the on-road examination (ORE). Since July 2017, a pilot deployment of the VDT in state licensing centers (VDT pilot) has collected both VDT and ORE data from new license applicants with the aim of creating a scoring algorithm that could predict those who were underprepared.
OBJECTIVE
Leveraging data collected from the VDT pilot, this study aimed to develop and conduct an initial evaluation of a novel machine learning (ML)-based classifier using limited domain knowledge and minimal feature engineering to reliably predict applicant pass/fail on the ORE. Such methods, if proven useful, could be applicable to the classification of other time series data collected within medical and other settings.
METHODS
We analyzed an initial dataset that comprised 4308 drivers who completed both the VDT and the ORE, in which 1096 (25.4%) drivers went on to fail the ORE. We studied 2 different approaches to constructing feature sets to use as input to ML algorithms: the standard method of reducing the time series data to a set of manually defined variables that summarize driving behavior and a novel approach using time series clustering. We then fed these representations into different ML algorithms to compare their ability to predict a driver's ORE outcome (pass/fail).
RESULTS
The new method using time series clustering performed similarly compared with the standard method in terms of overall accuracy for predicting pass or fail outcome (76.1% vs 76.2%) and area under the curve (0.656 vs 0.682). However, the time series clustering slightly outperformed the standard method in differentially predicting failure on the ORE. The novel clustering method yielded a risk ratio for failure of 3.07 (95% CI 2.75-3.43), whereas the standard variables method yielded a risk ratio for failure of 2.68 (95% CI 2.41-2.99). In addition, the time series clustering method with logistic regression produced the lowest ratio of false alarms (those who were predicted to fail but went on to pass the ORE; 27.2%).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results provide initial evidence that the clustering method is useful for feature construction in classification tasks involving time series data when resources are limited to create multiple, domain-relevant variables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32554384
pii: v22i6e13995
doi: 10.2196/13995
pmc: PMC7333075
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13995Informations de copyright
©David Grethlein, Flaura Koplin Winston, Elizabeth Walshe, Sean Tanner, Venk Kandadai, Santiago Ontañón. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.06.2020.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2003 May 22;19(8):973-80
pubmed: 12761060
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1285-90
pubmed: 21545856
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 May;35(3):311-20
pubmed: 12643948
J Safety Res. 2014 Sep;50:125-38
pubmed: 25142369
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Nov;35(6):921-5
pubmed: 12971927
Inj Prev. 2015 Jun;21(3):145-52
pubmed: 25740939
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Nov;51(5):484-90
pubmed: 23084170
Transp Res Rec. 2012;2321:73-78
pubmed: 23543947
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 21;15(10):e232
pubmed: 24144946
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:302-8
pubmed: 25103321
Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:359-71
pubmed: 21625472