The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm.
conceptual framework
harmful gambling
harmful gambling antecedents
interdisciplinarity
public health
social determinants of health
Journal
Journal of behavioral addictions
ISSN: 2063-5303
Titre abrégé: J Behav Addict
Pays: Hungary
ID NLM: 101602037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
05
09
2019
accepted:
05
04
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
3
6
2021
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling moves beyond a symptoms-based view of harm and addresses a broad set of factors related to the risks and effects of gambling harmfully at the individual, family, and community levels. Coauthored by international research experts and informed by multiple stakeholders, Gambling Research Exchange (GREO) facilitated the framework development in 2013 and retains responsibility for regular updates and mobilization. This review article presents information about the revised version of the Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling completed in late 2018. We describe eight interrelated factors depicted in the framework that represent major themes in gambling ranging from the specific (gambling environment, exposure, gambling types, and treatment resources) to the general (cultural, social, psychological, and biological influences). After outlining the framework development and collaborative process, we highlight new topics for the recent update that reflect changes in the gambling landscape and prominent discourses in the scientific community. Some of these topics include social and economic impacts of gambling, and a new model of understanding gambling related harm. We address the relevance of the CFHG to the gambling and behavioral addictions research community. Harm-based frameworks have been undertaken in other areas of addiction that can both inform and be informed by a model dedicated to harmful gambling. Further, the framework brings a multi-disciplinary perspective to bear on antecedents and factors that co-occur with harmful gambling.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling moves beyond a symptoms-based view of harm and addresses a broad set of factors related to the risks and effects of gambling harmfully at the individual, family, and community levels. Coauthored by international research experts and informed by multiple stakeholders, Gambling Research Exchange (GREO) facilitated the framework development in 2013 and retains responsibility for regular updates and mobilization. This review article presents information about the revised version of the Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling completed in late 2018.
METHODS
METHODS
We describe eight interrelated factors depicted in the framework that represent major themes in gambling ranging from the specific (gambling environment, exposure, gambling types, and treatment resources) to the general (cultural, social, psychological, and biological influences). After outlining the framework development and collaborative process, we highlight new topics for the recent update that reflect changes in the gambling landscape and prominent discourses in the scientific community. Some of these topics include social and economic impacts of gambling, and a new model of understanding gambling related harm.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We address the relevance of the CFHG to the gambling and behavioral addictions research community. Harm-based frameworks have been undertaken in other areas of addiction that can both inform and be informed by a model dedicated to harmful gambling. Further, the framework brings a multi-disciplinary perspective to bear on antecedents and factors that co-occur with harmful gambling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32554839
doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00024
pmc: PMC8939413
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
190-205Références
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Aug;2(8):530-532
pubmed: 31209310
BMJ. 2019 May 8;365:l1807
pubmed: 31068335
J Gambl Stud. 2000 Winter;16(4):461-7
pubmed: 14634309
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;61(2):102-11
pubmed: 27253701
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Jun;33(2):397-424
pubmed: 27372832
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2013;11:75-96
pubmed: 24707239
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Dec 1;181:152-161
pubmed: 29055269
J Gambl Stud. 1999 Autumn;15(3):181-212
pubmed: 12766457
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Sep;23(3):372-86
pubmed: 24942902
J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):318-24
pubmed: 27348556
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Jun;28(2):404-13
pubmed: 24274433
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Jun;33(2):555-577
pubmed: 27437702
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):2021-2022
pubmed: 28990302
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Aug;48:7-31
pubmed: 27372437
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Sep;25(3):511-20
pubmed: 21604831
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 1;1(2):189-203
pubmed: 24904757
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:109-124
pubmed: 27855334
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):537-46
pubmed: 24569904
Addict Behav. 2019 Sep;96:26-34
pubmed: 31030176
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Dec;32(4):1279-1304
pubmed: 27002522
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Jan;17(1):43-61
pubmed: 25477014
Neuropharmacology. 2018 Mar 15;131:51-57
pubmed: 29221791
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;67(6):624-30
pubmed: 20530012
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Jun;31(2):455-70
pubmed: 24390714
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Jul;47(7):592-607
pubmed: 19446287
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;49(6):519-39
pubmed: 25735959
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):163-167
pubmed: 28425779
Addiction. 2016 Mar;111(3):420-35
pubmed: 26381314
Addiction. 2018 Apr;113(4):699-707
pubmed: 29105942
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;28(4):1198-211
pubmed: 25134059
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 24;7(1):16306
pubmed: 29176580
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Mar 05;2:385-93
pubmed: 24179792
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):435-51
pubmed: 23423729
Qual Life Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2361-2371
pubmed: 29777460
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jan 07;6(1):e65
pubmed: 30617046
Psychol Med. 2013 May;43(5):1059-68
pubmed: 22932231
Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):867-875
pubmed: 27350401
J Gambl Stud. 2004 Fall;20(3):301-17
pubmed: 15353926
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec;31(4):1201-14
pubmed: 25424057
J Gambl Stud. 2011 Dec;27(4):565-73
pubmed: 21359586
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Dec;33(4):1187-1200
pubmed: 28258336
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0214502
pubmed: 30995229
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):2011-2020
pubmed: 28623865
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Oct;62(10):862-8
pubmed: 18791042
Addiction. 2010 Oct;105(10):1819-24
pubmed: 20712818
Addiction. 2015 Aug;110(8):1340-51
pubmed: 25879250
J Gambl Stud. 2003 Summer;19(2):149-84
pubmed: 12766468
J Gambl Stud. 2006 Dec;22(4):427-42
pubmed: 16912932
Br J Sociol. 2014 Mar;65(1):170-91
pubmed: 24588758
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):743-755
pubmed: 30879158
Can J Public Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;101(2):171-5
pubmed: 20524385
J Behav Addict. 2016 Dec;5(4):592-613
pubmed: 27784180
CMAJ. 2009 Aug 4;181(3-4):165-8
pubmed: 19620273
Addiction. 2018 Oct;113(10):1862-1873
pubmed: 29806197
Health Promot Int. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):1207-1217
pubmed: 30202889
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Feb 8;16(1):12
pubmed: 30736817
J Gambl Stud. 1999 Winter;15(4):289-365
pubmed: 12766466
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):317-320
pubmed: 28889755