All-suture anchors in arthroscopic acetabular labral repair: our experience.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 05 2020
30 05 2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2020
accepted:
30
04
2020
entrez:
20
6
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Over the past years, the role of the acetabular labrum in hip joint biomechanics and its relations with joint health has been of particular interest. There is a good clinical improvement of patients in whom the acetabular labrum is preserved during arthroscopic hip surgery. The purpose of this study is to report the results of arthroscopic repair of labral tears at a medium term follow up. We performed a retrospective review of all cases that underwent hip arthroscopy at our Institution from January 2013 until December 2018. There were 24 patients, 13 males and 11 females, and their mean age at the time of surgery was 29, 42 years (range, 19 to 43 years). All patients were treated by the same surgeon with an extracapsular OUT-IN approach. Suture was performed using a non-absorbable suture anchor all-suture. Clinical assessment was performed at December 2019 using a modified Harris hip score (mHHS), hip outcomes score activities of daily living (HOS ADL), hip outcomes score activities of sport scale (HOS SS). All patients with acetabular labrum injury had femoro-acetabular impingement. The mean overall values in the preoperative period were 67.21 ± 10.31 for mHHS, 70.04 ± 12.11 for HOS-ADL and 60.06 ± 14.58 for HOS -SS. The results obtained in the re-evaluations of patients in December 2019 with a mean follow-up of 38, 3 months (minimum 1 year) are on average 82.17 ± 11.36 for mHHS, 83.00 ± 12.80 for HOS-ADL and 76.09 ± 18.52 for HOS-SS. The progress of knowledge and the advancement of diagnostic and therapeutic skills has led to a greater awareness of the importance of treating acetabular labrum tears. Arthroscopic treatment with suture appear to be a good option for these patients and we had encouraging results in our center.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Over the past years, the role of the acetabular labrum in hip joint biomechanics and its relations with joint health has been of particular interest. There is a good clinical improvement of patients in whom the acetabular labrum is preserved during arthroscopic hip surgery. The purpose of this study is to report the results of arthroscopic repair of labral tears at a medium term follow up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a retrospective review of all cases that underwent hip arthroscopy at our Institution from January 2013 until December 2018. There were 24 patients, 13 males and 11 females, and their mean age at the time of surgery was 29, 42 years (range, 19 to 43 years). All patients were treated by the same surgeon with an extracapsular OUT-IN approach. Suture was performed using a non-absorbable suture anchor all-suture. Clinical assessment was performed at December 2019 using a modified Harris hip score (mHHS), hip outcomes score activities of daily living (HOS ADL), hip outcomes score activities of sport scale (HOS SS). All patients with acetabular labrum injury had femoro-acetabular impingement.
RESULTS
The mean overall values in the preoperative period were 67.21 ± 10.31 for mHHS, 70.04 ± 12.11 for HOS-ADL and 60.06 ± 14.58 for HOS -SS. The results obtained in the re-evaluations of patients in December 2019 with a mean follow-up of 38, 3 months (minimum 1 year) are on average 82.17 ± 11.36 for mHHS, 83.00 ± 12.80 for HOS-ADL and 76.09 ± 18.52 for HOS-SS.
CONCLUSIONS
The progress of knowledge and the advancement of diagnostic and therapeutic skills has led to a greater awareness of the importance of treating acetabular labrum tears. Arthroscopic treatment with suture appear to be a good option for these patients and we had encouraging results in our center.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32555081
doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9661
pmc: PMC7944822
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
85-91Références
Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Mar;11(1):28-35
pubmed: 30838105
Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):623-7
pubmed: 25922455
Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):369-76
pubmed: 19341923
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):46-53
pubmed: 23276413
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Jan 20;132(2):211-219
pubmed: 30614856
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):997-1004
pubmed: 28632588
Arthroscopy. 2010 Jun;26(6):750-6
pubmed: 20511032
Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1015-21
pubmed: 22307078
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009 Jun;2(2):105-17
pubmed: 19468871
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Sep;(426):145-50
pubmed: 15346066
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2882-2890
pubmed: 28731779
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(4):311-9
pubmed: 23902774
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39 Suppl:103S-10S
pubmed: 21709039
Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):365-8
pubmed: 19341922
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1748-1755
pubmed: 31634004
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Jul;15(6):463-8
pubmed: 10771126
Arthroscopy. 2014 Feb;30(2):208-13
pubmed: 24485114
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Mar 31;3(1):5-15
pubmed: 27026814
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1683-8
pubmed: 25939610
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1284-1293
pubmed: 29337602
J Biomech. 2003 Feb;36(2):171-8
pubmed: 12547354
Acta Biomed. 2016 Apr 15;87 Suppl 1:41-5
pubmed: 27104319
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):730-5
pubmed: 27235512
J Biomech. 2000 Aug;33(8):953-60
pubmed: 10828325
BMJ. 2019 Feb 7;364:l185
pubmed: 30733197
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Dec;(393):25-37
pubmed: 11764355
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):98-104
pubmed: 25361860
Arthroscopy. 1996 Jun;12(3):269-72
pubmed: 8783819
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2079-2088
pubmed: 29847149
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):730-6
pubmed: 24509878
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Sep;12(3):291-299
pubmed: 31346980
Lancet. 2018 Jun 2;391(10136):2225-2235
pubmed: 29893223
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Feb 5;8(2):2325967119900767
pubmed: 32076628