Smoking Assessment and Current Smoking Status Among Adolescents in Primary Care Settings.


Journal

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
ISSN: 1469-994X
Titre abrégé: Nicotine Tob Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815751

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 10 2020
Historique:
received: 20 02 2020
accepted: 10 06 2020
pubmed: 20 6 2020
medline: 9 2 2021
entrez: 20 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Initiating tobacco use in adolescence increases the risk of nicotine dependence and continued use into adulthood. Primary care visits provide opportunities for the assessment and treatment of tobacco use; however, little is known about prevalence and correlates of assessing smoking status and current use among adolescents in these settings. Using electronic health record data from the OCHIN network, we identified adolescents with greater than or equal to one primary care visit to a study clinic (n = 366 clinics from 15 US states) during January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. We estimated odds ratios of smoking assessment and current smoking status by patient covariates. Of 140 887 patients, 87.4% were assessed for smoking. Being Latino or Black (adjusted odds ratio = 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.32; adjusted odds ratio = 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.29, respectively, vs. non-Hispanic White), publicly insured, having more visits, and having an asthma diagnosis or other respiratory symptoms were associated with higher odds of assessment. Odds were lower if the patient was male and uninsured. Of those assessed, 1.6% identified as current smokers. Being older, having more visits, an asthma diagnosis, other respiratory symptoms, and lower household income was associated with higher odds of being a current smoker. Latinos and Blacks had lower odds than non-Hispanic Whites. Although some commonly reported tobacco-related disparities were not present, smoking assessment and current smoking status differed significantly by most patient demographics. Implementation of adolescent tobacco assessment protocols and the development of interventions to target subpopulations of adolescents with higher rates of smoking could mitigate disparate rates of assessment and smoking, respectively. Clinical guidelines recommend screening adolescents for tobacco use in primary care settings. We found that most adolescents seen in US safety-net primary care clinics were assessed for smoking. We also found that smoking assessment and current smoking status differed significantly by most patient demographics. Implementing tobacco assessment protocols specific to adolescents could mitigate disparate rates of assessment and ensure accurate documentation of all forms of tobacco use, given the evolution of alternative tobacco products and poly use among adolescents. Interventions to target subpopulations of adolescents with higher smoking rates are needed to prevent the negative health effects of continued smoking.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32556337
pii: 5859162
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa106
pmc: PMC7593351
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2098-2103

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : K23 DA037453
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 MD011404
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Am J Public Health. 2018 Aug;108(8):1082-1090
pubmed: 29927641
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):222-230
pubmed: 29934017
Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):1008-17
pubmed: 26504137
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2):
pubmed: 30651304
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Feb 15;68(6):157-164
pubmed: 30763302
Fed Regist. 2010 Jul 28;75(144):44589-654
pubmed: 20677416
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):767-778
pubmed: 27180028
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2009;27:243-72
pubmed: 20192107
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Jun;22(3):394-8
pubmed: 21746750
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):1023-1029
pubmed: 31074792
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jun 01;67(21):599-601
pubmed: 29851942
Pediatrics. 2018 Apr;141(4):
pubmed: 29545271
Tob Induc Dis. 2017 Jan 10;15:2
pubmed: 28077940
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2100-2105
pubmed: 27613894

Auteurs

Steffani R Bailey (SR)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Katie Fankhauser (K)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Miguel Marino (M)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Teresa Schmidt (T)

OCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR.

Sophia Giebultowicz (S)

OCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR.

David Ezekiel-Herrera (D)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

John Heintzman (J)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
OCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH