Effects of irrigation parameters and access sheath size on the intra-renal temperature during flexible ureteroscopy with a high-power laser.
Laser
Pig
Temperature
Ureteroscopy
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
17
04
2020
accepted:
28
05
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
7
10
2021
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the effect of different laser power settings on intra-renal temperature (IRT) under different irrigation conditions during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in a live-anesthetized porcine model. Following ethics approval, 2 female pigs weighing ~ 28 kg were used. Under general anesthesia, a percutaneous access was obtained to fix a K-type thermocouple inside the pelvi-calyceal system for real-time recording of IRT during FURS without UAS, UAS-10/12, UAS-12/14, and UAS-14/16F. A high-power holmium laser was used and the IRT was recorded during laser activation for up to 60 s at a laser power of 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W under gravity irrigation and manual pump irrigation. Under gravity irrigation, FURS without UAS was associated with hazardous IRT at a laser power as low as 20 W for as short as 20 s of laser activation. The IRT was rendered borderline when UAS was used. This UAS buffering effect disappeared with the use of higher laser-power settings (40 W and 60 W) with the maximal IRT exceeding 60 °C. Moreover, laser activation at 60 W was associated with very rapid increase in IRT within few seconds. Under pump irrigation, laser activation at the highest power setting (60 W) for 60 s was associated with a safe IRT, even without the use of UAS. The maximal IRT was below 45 °C. The use of high-power Ho:YAG laser carries potentially harmful thermal effect when used under gravity irrigation, even when large-diameter UAS is used. High-power settings (> 40 W) require high irrigation flow. The use of UAS is advisable to reduce the IRT and balance any intra-renal pressure increase.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32556675
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03287-9
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03287-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1257-1262Références
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
Rassweiler J, Rassweiler M-C, Klein J (2016) New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol 26(1):95–106
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000240
Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN (2020) Lasers for stone treatment: how safe are they? Curr Opin Urol 30(2):130–134
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000706
Fried NM, Irby PB (2018) Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol 15(9):563–573
doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0035-8
Elhilali MM, Badaan S, Ibrahim A, Andonian S (2017) Use of the moses technology to improve holmium laser lithotripsy outcomes: a preclinical study. J Endourol 31(6):598–604
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0050
Aldoukhi AH, Hall TL, Ghani KR, Maxwell AD, MacConaghy B, Roberts WW (2018) Caliceal fluid temperature during high-power holmium laser lithotripsy in an in vivo porcine model. J Endourol 32(8):724–729
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0395
Dong H, Peng Y, Li L, Gao X (2018) Prevention strategies for ureteral stricture following ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Asian J Urol 5(2):94–100
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.09.002
Aldoukhi AH, Ghani KR, Hall TL, Roberts WW (2017) Thermal response to high-power holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 31(12):1308–1312
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0679
Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Adamou C, Zazas E, Liatsikos EN (2019) The effect of irrigation power and ureteral access sheath diameter on the maximal intra-pelvic pressure during ureteroscopy: in vivo experimental study in a live anesthetized pig. J Endourol 33(9):725–729
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0317
He X, McGee S, Coad JE, Schmidlin F, Iaizzo PA, Swanlund DJ et al (2004) Investigation of the thermal and tissue injury behaviour in microwave thermal therapy using a porcine kidney model. Int J Hyperth: Off J Eur Soc Hyperth Oncol N Am Hyperth Group 20(6):567–593
doi: 10.1080/0265673042000209770
van Rhoon GC, Samaras T, Yarmolenko PS, Dewhirst MW, Neufeld E, Kuster N (2013) CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels? Eur Radiol 23(8):2215–2227
doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2825-y
Winship B, Wollin D, Carlos E, Peters C, Li J, Terry R et al (2019) The rise and fall of high temperatures during ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 33(10):794–799
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0084
Maxwell AD, MacConaghy B, Harper JD, Aldoukhi AH, Hall TL, Roberts WW (2019) Simulation of laser lithotripsy-induced heating in the urinary tract. J Endourol 33(2):113–119
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0485
Hein S, Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Müller P-F, Schoenthaler M, Miernik A (2020) Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. World J Urol 38(3):753–760
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02808-5
Kallidonis P, Kamal W, Panagopoulos V, Vasilas M, Amanatides L, Kyriazis I et al (2016) Thulium laser in the upper urinary tract: does the heat generation in the irrigation fluid pose a risk? Evidence from an in vivo experimental study. J Endourol 30(5):555–559
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0768
Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, Lee DI, Felfela T, Conradie MC et al (2003) Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology 61(4):713–718
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02440-8
Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A, Kata SG, Nabi G, Brown S (2010) Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol 24(12):1915–1920
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0188
Guzelburc V, Balasar M, Colakogullari M, Guven S, Kandemir A, Ozturk A et al (2016) Comparison of absorbed irrigation fluid volumes during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cm. SpringerPlus 5(1):1707
doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3383-y
Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F, Buttice S, Doizi S et al (2016) Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol 30(1):49–55
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0387