Effects of irrigation parameters and access sheath size on the intra-renal temperature during flexible ureteroscopy with a high-power laser.


Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 17 04 2020
accepted: 28 05 2020
pubmed: 20 6 2020
medline: 7 10 2021
entrez: 20 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the effect of different laser power settings on intra-renal temperature (IRT) under different irrigation conditions during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in a live-anesthetized porcine model. Following ethics approval, 2 female pigs weighing ~ 28 kg were used. Under general anesthesia, a percutaneous access was obtained to fix a K-type thermocouple inside the pelvi-calyceal system for real-time recording of IRT during FURS without UAS, UAS-10/12, UAS-12/14, and UAS-14/16F. A high-power holmium laser was used and the IRT was recorded during laser activation for up to 60 s at a laser power of 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W under gravity irrigation and manual pump irrigation. Under gravity irrigation, FURS without UAS was associated with hazardous IRT at a laser power as low as 20 W for as short as 20 s of laser activation. The IRT was rendered borderline when UAS was used. This UAS buffering effect disappeared with the use of higher laser-power settings (40 W and 60 W) with the maximal IRT exceeding 60 °C. Moreover, laser activation at 60 W was associated with very rapid increase in IRT within few seconds. Under pump irrigation, laser activation at the highest power setting (60 W) for 60 s was associated with a safe IRT, even without the use of UAS. The maximal IRT was below 45 °C. The use of high-power Ho:YAG laser carries potentially harmful thermal effect when used under gravity irrigation, even when large-diameter UAS is used. High-power settings (> 40 W) require high irrigation flow. The use of UAS is advisable to reduce the IRT and balance any intra-renal pressure increase.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32556675
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03287-9
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03287-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1257-1262

Références

Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
Rassweiler J, Rassweiler M-C, Klein J (2016) New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol 26(1):95–106
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000240
Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN (2020) Lasers for stone treatment: how safe are they? Curr Opin Urol 30(2):130–134
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000706
Fried NM, Irby PB (2018) Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol 15(9):563–573
doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0035-8
Elhilali MM, Badaan S, Ibrahim A, Andonian S (2017) Use of the moses technology to improve holmium laser lithotripsy outcomes: a preclinical study. J Endourol 31(6):598–604
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0050
Aldoukhi AH, Hall TL, Ghani KR, Maxwell AD, MacConaghy B, Roberts WW (2018) Caliceal fluid temperature during high-power holmium laser lithotripsy in an in vivo porcine model. J Endourol 32(8):724–729
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0395
Dong H, Peng Y, Li L, Gao X (2018) Prevention strategies for ureteral stricture following ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Asian J Urol 5(2):94–100
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.09.002
Aldoukhi AH, Ghani KR, Hall TL, Roberts WW (2017) Thermal response to high-power holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 31(12):1308–1312
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0679
Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Adamou C, Zazas E, Liatsikos EN (2019) The effect of irrigation power and ureteral access sheath diameter on the maximal intra-pelvic pressure during ureteroscopy: in vivo experimental study in a live anesthetized pig. J Endourol 33(9):725–729
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0317
He X, McGee S, Coad JE, Schmidlin F, Iaizzo PA, Swanlund DJ et al (2004) Investigation of the thermal and tissue injury behaviour in microwave thermal therapy using a porcine kidney model. Int J Hyperth: Off J Eur Soc Hyperth Oncol N Am Hyperth Group 20(6):567–593
doi: 10.1080/0265673042000209770
van Rhoon GC, Samaras T, Yarmolenko PS, Dewhirst MW, Neufeld E, Kuster N (2013) CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels? Eur Radiol 23(8):2215–2227
doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2825-y
Winship B, Wollin D, Carlos E, Peters C, Li J, Terry R et al (2019) The rise and fall of high temperatures during ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 33(10):794–799
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0084
Maxwell AD, MacConaghy B, Harper JD, Aldoukhi AH, Hall TL, Roberts WW (2019) Simulation of laser lithotripsy-induced heating in the urinary tract. J Endourol 33(2):113–119
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0485
Hein S, Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Müller P-F, Schoenthaler M, Miernik A (2020) Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. World J Urol 38(3):753–760
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02808-5
Kallidonis P, Kamal W, Panagopoulos V, Vasilas M, Amanatides L, Kyriazis I et al (2016) Thulium laser in the upper urinary tract: does the heat generation in the irrigation fluid pose a risk? Evidence from an in vivo experimental study. J Endourol 30(5):555–559
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0768
Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, Lee DI, Felfela T, Conradie MC et al (2003) Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology 61(4):713–718
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02440-8
Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A, Kata SG, Nabi G, Brown S (2010) Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol 24(12):1915–1920
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0188
Guzelburc V, Balasar M, Colakogullari M, Guven S, Kandemir A, Ozturk A et al (2016) Comparison of absorbed irrigation fluid volumes during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cm. SpringerPlus 5(1):1707
doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3383-y
Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F, Buttice S, Doizi S et al (2016) Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol 30(1):49–55
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0387

Auteurs

Yasser A Noureldin (YA)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.

Ergina Farsari (E)

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Panteleimon Ntasiotis (P)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Constantinos Adamou (C)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Athanasios Vagionis (A)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Theofanis Vrettos (T)

Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Evangelos N Liatsikos (EN)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece. liatsikos@yahoo.com.
Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. liatsikos@yahoo.com.

Panagiotis Kallidonis (P)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH