First evidence for the antitumor activity of nanoliposomal irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic biliary tract cancer.


Journal

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
ISSN: 1432-0843
Titre abrégé: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7806519

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 20 03 2020
accepted: 03 06 2020
pubmed: 20 6 2020
medline: 20 2 2021
entrez: 20 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Therapeutic options are limited for advanced, metastatic biliary tract cancer. The pivotal NAPOLI-1 trial demonstrated the superior clinical benefit of nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; however, the antitumor activity of Nal-IRI in biliary tract cancer is unknown. This is the first report describing the efficacy of Nal-IRI in biliary tract cancer. In this multicenter retrospective cohort analysis, we identified patients with metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma who were treated with Nal-IRI in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid following tumor progression under standard therapy at one of the study centers between May 2016 and January 2019. We assessed disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). There were 14 patients; the median age at the time of diagnosis and the median age at the initiation of Nal-IRI were 59.3 and 60.0 years, respectively. Nal-IRI in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid was administered as second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line treatment in 6 (43%), 5 (36%), 2 (14%), and 1 (7%) patient with metastatic disease, respectively. The objective DCR with Nal-IRI was 50% (7/14 patients). Six patients (43%) had partial response, and one patient (7%) had stable disease. Progressive disease was observed in seven patients. The median PFS and median OS following Nal-IRI initiation were 10.6 and 24.1 months, respectively. This retrospective analysis provides the first evidence that Nal-IRI might exhibit a clinical meaningful antitumor activity in metastatic biliary tract cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Therapeutic options are limited for advanced, metastatic biliary tract cancer. The pivotal NAPOLI-1 trial demonstrated the superior clinical benefit of nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; however, the antitumor activity of Nal-IRI in biliary tract cancer is unknown. This is the first report describing the efficacy of Nal-IRI in biliary tract cancer.
METHODS
In this multicenter retrospective cohort analysis, we identified patients with metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma who were treated with Nal-IRI in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid following tumor progression under standard therapy at one of the study centers between May 2016 and January 2019. We assessed disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
There were 14 patients; the median age at the time of diagnosis and the median age at the initiation of Nal-IRI were 59.3 and 60.0 years, respectively. Nal-IRI in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid was administered as second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line treatment in 6 (43%), 5 (36%), 2 (14%), and 1 (7%) patient with metastatic disease, respectively. The objective DCR with Nal-IRI was 50% (7/14 patients). Six patients (43%) had partial response, and one patient (7%) had stable disease. Progressive disease was observed in seven patients. The median PFS and median OS following Nal-IRI initiation were 10.6 and 24.1 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This retrospective analysis provides the first evidence that Nal-IRI might exhibit a clinical meaningful antitumor activity in metastatic biliary tract cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32556829
doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04094-0
pii: 10.1007/s00280-020-04094-0
pmc: PMC7338813
doi:

Substances chimiques

Drug Carriers 0
Liposomes 0
Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
Irinotecan 7673326042
Leucovorin Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT
Gemcitabine 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109-115

Références

Bridgewater J, Imber C (2007) New advances in the management of biliary tract cancer. HPB (Oxford) 9(2):104–111
doi: 10.1080/13651820701216216
Ciombor KK, Goff LW (2013) Advances in the management of biliary tract cancers. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 11(1):28–34
pubmed: 23416860 pmcid: 3713630
Bridgewater JA et al (2016) Biliary tract cancer: epidemiology, radiotherapy, and molecular profiling. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 35:e194–203
doi: 10.14694/EDBK_160831
Zhao DY, Lim KH (2017) Current biologics for treatment of biliary tract cancers. J Gastrointest Oncol 8(3):430–440
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.05.04
Valle J et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362(14):1273–1281
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721
Lamarca A et al (2019) ABC-06|A randomised phase III, multi-centre, open-label study of active symptom control (ASC) alone or ASC with oxaliplatin/5-FU chemotherapy (ASC+mFOLFOX) for patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancers (ABC) previously-treated with cisplatin/gemcitabine (CisGem) chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 37(15_suppl):4003–4003
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.4003
Lamarca A et al (2014) Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 25(12):2328–2338
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu162
Patel T (2011) Cholangiocarcinoma–controversies and challenges. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(4):189–200
doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.20
Sahu S, Sun W (2017) Targeted therapy in biliary tract cancers-current limitations and potentials in the future. J Gastrointest Oncol 8(2):324–336
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.09.16
Bragazzi MC et al (2018) New insights into cholangiocarcinoma: multiple stems and related cell lineages of origin. Ann Gastroenterol 31(1):42–55
pubmed: 29333066
Brandi G et al (2015) Genetic heterogeneity in cholangiocarcinoma: a major challenge for targeted therapies. Oncotarget 6(17):14744–14753
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4539
Zhang H (2016) Onivyde for the therapy of multiple solid tumors. Onco Targets Ther 9:3001–3007
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S105587
Chang TC et al (2015) Phase I study of nanoliposomal irinotecan (PEP02) in advanced solid tumor patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75(3):579–586
doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2671-x
Woo W, Carey ET, Choi M (2019) Spotlight on liposomal irinotecan for metastatic pancreatic cancer: patient selection and perspectives. Onco Targets Ther 12:1455–1463
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S167590
Wang-Gillam A et al (2019) NAPOLI-1 phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan in metastatic pancreatic cancer: final overall survival analysis and characteristics of long-term survivors. Eur J Cancer 108:78–87
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.007
Schmuck RB et al (2016) Distal bile duct carcinomas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: postulating a common tumor entity. Cancer Med 5(1):88–99
doi: 10.1002/cam4.566
Nakanuma Y, Sato Y (2014) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is pathologically similar to pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma: suggestions of similar background and development. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(7):441–447
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.70
Feisthammel J et al (2007) Irinotecan with 5-FU/FA in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinomas: a multicenter phase II trial. Am J Clin Oncol 30(3):319–324
doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000258124.72884.7a
Zheng Y et al (2018) A randomised phase II study of second-line XELIRI regimen versus irinotecan monotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer patients progressed on gemcitabine and cisplatin. Br J Cancer 119(3):291–295
doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0138-2
Bhargava P et al (2003) Gemcitabine and irinotecan in locally advanced or metastatic biliary cancer: preliminary report. Oncology (Williston Park) 17(9 Suppl 8):23–26
Sanz-Altamira PM et al (2001) A phase II trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) for unresectable biliary tree carcinoma. Ann Oncol 12(4):501–504
doi: 10.1023/A:1011135014895

Auteurs

Hossein Taghizadeh (H)

Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.

Matthias Unseld (M)

Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.

Andreas Schmiderer (A)

Clinical Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Angela Djanani (A)

Clinical Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Klaus Wilthoner (K)

Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Salzkammergut Klinikum, Vöcklabruck, Upper Austria, Austria.

Dieter Buchinger (D)

Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Salzkammergut Klinikum, Vöcklabruck, Upper Austria, Austria.

Gerald W Prager (GW)

Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. gerald.prager@meduniwien.ac.at.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria. gerald.prager@meduniwien.ac.at.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH