Total colpocleisis technique in huge neglected ulcerated uterovaginal prolapse.
Colpocleisis
Erosion
Obliterative surgery
Uterovaginal prolapse
Journal
International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
05
02
2020
accepted:
16
03
2020
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present a video describing the technical considerations for performing a total colpocleisis in the management of significant, neglected, ulcerated, and symptomatic complete uterovaginal prolapse. A 79-year-old debilitated woman presented with a large, ulcerated pelvic bulge. A previous attempt at pessary treatment failed because of a disproportion of the pessary with the prolapse size. She had a history of liver insufficiency and hypertension. Obliterative colpocleisis surgery was selected because the healing of a large ulcerated vagina was not likely within a short timeframe. Sharp dissection with scissors and de-epithelialisation of the remaining non-eroded vaginal mucosa with the friction of a sharp-edged surgical knife were performed. Closely located purse strings were used to obliterate potential spaces. Two mirror image triangles in the anterior and posterior vaginal walls were removed. After the formation of a new perineal body, the diamond-shaped vaginal incision was closed vertically to narrow introitus. The patient was discharged on the first postoperative day and an uncomplicated postoperative course ensued. At the 4-week follow-up, there was no evidence of infection, recurrent prolapse, de novo stress incontinence, or voiding with difficulty. Total colpocleisis is an excellent surgical option in women with multiple, large cervicovaginal ulcers and multiple comorbidities with no desire for penetrative vaginal function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32556845
doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04288-3
pii: 10.1007/s00192-020-04288-3
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2169-2171Références
Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defect. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:795–806.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.602
Buchsbaum GM, Lee TG. Vaginal obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(3):175–83.
doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000406
Fitzgerald MP, Richter HE, Bradley CS, et al. Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1603–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0696-6
Linder BJ, Gebhart JB, Occhino JA. Total colpocleisis: technical considerations. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(11):1767–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3034-4
Adelowo A, O’Neal E, Hota L. Underlying factors contributing to the delay in patients seeking care for pelvic floor dysfunction. Clin Trials J. 2014;4(174):2167–0870.1000174.
Deshpande HG, Madkar CS, Kiwalkar SR. Relationship of decubitus ulcer on cervix in pelvic organ prolapse with POP-Q staging. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(3):266–71.
doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1127-3
Abdullah B, Khong SY, Tan PC. Oestrogen-soaked vaginal packing for decubitus ulcer in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a case series. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(7):1057–62.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2930-3
Castañón A, Landy R, Cuzick J, Sasieni P. Cervical screening at age 50–64 years and the risk of cervical cancer at age 65 years and older: population-based case control study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(1):e1001585.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001585
Thakar R, Stanton S. Management of genital prolapse. BMJ. 2002;324(7348):1258–62.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1258