Surrogate Satisfaction with Decision Making After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Cerebral hemorrhage
Critical care
Family research
Family satisfaction
Resuscitation orders
Journal
Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
30
9
2021
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surrogate decision makers for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are frequently asked to make difficult decisions on use of life-sustaining treatments. We explored ICH surrogate satisfaction with decision making and experience of decision regret using validated measures in a prospective multicenter study. Cases of non-traumatic ICH were enrolled from three hospitals (September 2015-December 2016), and surrogate decision makers were invited to complete a self-administered survey. The primary outcome was the 10-item decision-making subscale of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit scale (FSICU-DM, range 0-100, higher is greater satisfaction), and the secondary outcome was the decision regret scale (range 0-100, higher is greater regret). Linear regression models were used to assess the association between satisfaction with decision making and pre-specified covariates using manual backward selection. A total of 73 surrogates were approached for participation (in person or mail), with 48 surrogates returning a completed survey (median surrogate age 60.5 years, 63% female, 77% white). Patients had a median age of 72.5, 54% were female, with a median admission Glasgow coma scale of 10, in-hospital mortality of 31%, and 56% with an in-hospital DNR order. Physicians commonly made treatment recommendation (> 50%) regarding brain surgery or transitions to comfort measures, but rarely made recommendations (< 20%) regarding DNR orders. Surrogate satisfaction with decision making was generally high (median FSICU-DM 85, IQR 57.5-95). Factors associated with higher satisfaction on multivariable analysis included greater use of shared decision making (P < 0.0001), younger patient age (p = 0.02), ICH score of 3 or higher (p = 0.03), and surrogate relationship (spouse vs. other, p = 0.02). Timing of DNR orders was not associated with satisfaction (P > 0.25). Decision regret scores were generally low (median 12.5, IQR 0-31.3). Considering the severity and abruptness of ICH, it is reassuring that surrogate satisfaction with decision making was generally high and regret was generally low. However, more work is needed to define the appropriate outcome measures and optimal methods of recruitment for studies of surrogate decision makers of ICH patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
Surrogate decision makers for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are frequently asked to make difficult decisions on use of life-sustaining treatments. We explored ICH surrogate satisfaction with decision making and experience of decision regret using validated measures in a prospective multicenter study.
METHODS
Cases of non-traumatic ICH were enrolled from three hospitals (September 2015-December 2016), and surrogate decision makers were invited to complete a self-administered survey. The primary outcome was the 10-item decision-making subscale of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit scale (FSICU-DM, range 0-100, higher is greater satisfaction), and the secondary outcome was the decision regret scale (range 0-100, higher is greater regret). Linear regression models were used to assess the association between satisfaction with decision making and pre-specified covariates using manual backward selection.
RESULTS
A total of 73 surrogates were approached for participation (in person or mail), with 48 surrogates returning a completed survey (median surrogate age 60.5 years, 63% female, 77% white). Patients had a median age of 72.5, 54% were female, with a median admission Glasgow coma scale of 10, in-hospital mortality of 31%, and 56% with an in-hospital DNR order. Physicians commonly made treatment recommendation (> 50%) regarding brain surgery or transitions to comfort measures, but rarely made recommendations (< 20%) regarding DNR orders. Surrogate satisfaction with decision making was generally high (median FSICU-DM 85, IQR 57.5-95). Factors associated with higher satisfaction on multivariable analysis included greater use of shared decision making (P < 0.0001), younger patient age (p = 0.02), ICH score of 3 or higher (p = 0.03), and surrogate relationship (spouse vs. other, p = 0.02). Timing of DNR orders was not associated with satisfaction (P > 0.25). Decision regret scores were generally low (median 12.5, IQR 0-31.3).
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the severity and abruptness of ICH, it is reassuring that surrogate satisfaction with decision making was generally high and regret was generally low. However, more work is needed to define the appropriate outcome measures and optimal methods of recruitment for studies of surrogate decision makers of ICH patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32556855
doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01018-x
pii: 10.1007/s12028-020-01018-x
pmc: PMC7736185
mid: NIHMS1605072
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
193-200Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS070941
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS038916
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R21 NR016332
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K23 AG038731
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : UL1 RR024986
Pays : United States
Références
Zurasky JA, Aiyagari V, Zazulia AR, Shackelford A, Diringer MN. Early mortality following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2005;64:725–7.
doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152045.56837.58
Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:336–46.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00008
Trevick SA, Lord AS. Post-traumatic stress disorder and complicated grief are common in caregivers of neuro-ICU patients. Neurocrit Care. 2017;26:436–43.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0372-5
Hinkle LJ, Bosslet GT, Torke AM. Factors associated with family satisfaction with end-of-life care in the ICU: a systematic review. Chest. 2015;147:82–93.
doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1098
Salins N, Deodhar J, Muckaden MA. Intensive care unit death and factors influencing family satisfaction of intensive care unit care. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016;20:97–103.
doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.175942
Huang KB, Weber U, Johnson J, et al. Primary care physician involvement in shared decision making for critically Ill patients and family satisfaction with care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31:64–72.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170211
Hwang DY, Yagoda D, Perrey HM, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with care among family members of survivors in a neuroscience intensive care unit. J Neurosci Nurs. 2014;46:106–16.
doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000038
Zahuranec DB, Lisabeth LD, Sanchez BN, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage mortality is not changing despite declining incidence. Neurology. 2014;82:2180–6.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000519
Casarett D, Shreve S, Luhrs C, et al. Measuring families’ perceptions of care across a health care system: preliminary experience with the family assessment of treatment at end of life short form (FATE-S). J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;40:801–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.019
Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:891–7.
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.4.891
Zahuranec DB, Anspach RR, Roney ME, et al. Surrogate decision makers’ perspectives on family members’ prognosis after intracerebral hemorrhage. J Palliat Med. 2018;21:956–62.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0604
Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:271–9.
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50
Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Mak. 2003;23:281–92.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256005
Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande SW, Ozanne EM, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e2.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.3085
Strawbridge WJ, Shema SJ, Cohen RD, Roberts RE, Kaplan GA. Religiosity buffers effects of some stressors on depression but exacerbates others. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998;53:S118–26.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/53B.3.S118
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Hemphill JC 3rd, Newman J, Zhao S, Johnston SC. Hospital usage of early do-not-resuscitate orders and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35:1130–4.
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125858.71051.ca
Cai X, Robinson J, Muehlschlegel S, et al. Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in neuroscience intensive care units. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23:131–41.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0149-2
Braun UK, Naik AD, McCullough LB. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:249–53.
doi: 10.1370/afm.963
Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46:2032–60.
doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000069
Ferrando P, Gould DW, Walmsley E, et al. Family satisfaction with critical care in the UK: a multicentre cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e028956.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028956
Harrison DA, Ferrando-Vivas P, Wright SE, McColl E, Heyland DK, Rowan KM. Psychometric assessment of the family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaire in the United Kingdom. J Crit Care. 2017;38:346–50.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.023
Miller JJ, Morris P, Files DC, Gower E, Young M. Decision conflict and regret among surrogate decision makers in the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2016;32:79–84.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.11.023
Hickman RL Jr, Daly BJ, Lee E. Decisional conflict and regret: consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill. Appl Nurs Res. 2012;25:271–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2011.03.003
Brehm JW. Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. J Abnorm Psychol. 1956;52:384–9.
pubmed: 13318848
Jarcho JM, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD. The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011;6:460–7.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq054
LeBlanc TW, Lodato JE, Currow DC, Abernethy AP. Overcoming recruitment challenges in palliative care clinical trials. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:277–82.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000996
Zahuranec DB, Brown DL, Lisabeth LD, et al. Early care limitations independently predict mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2007;68:1651–7.
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261906.93238.72
Dotolo D, Nielsen EL, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA. Strategies for enhancing family participation in research in the ICU: findings from a qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;54(226–30):e1.