Does time taken by paediatric critical care transport teams to reach the bedside of critically ill children affect survival? A retrospective cohort study from England and Wales.
Critical care transport
Paediatric intensive care
Paediatric transport
Journal
BMC pediatrics
ISSN: 1471-2431
Titre abrégé: BMC Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 06 2020
19 06 2020
Historique:
received:
21
04
2020
accepted:
05
06
2020
entrez:
21
6
2020
pubmed:
21
6
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reaching the bedside of a critically ill child within three hours of agreeing the child requires intensive care is a key target for Paediatric Critical Care Transport teams (PCCTs) to achieve in the United Kingdom. Whilst timely access to specialist care is necessary for these children, it is unknown to what extent time taken for the PCCT to arrive at the bedside affects clinical outcome. Data from transports of critically ill children who were admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in England and Wales from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 were extracted from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) and linked with adult critical care data and Office for National Statistics mortality data. Logistic regression models, adjusted for pre-specified confounders, were fitted to investigate the impact of time-to-bedside on mortality within 30 days of admission and other key time points. Negative binomial models were used to investigate the impact of time-to-bedside on PICU length of stay and duration of invasive ventilation. There were 9116 children transported during the study period, and 645 (7.1%) died within 30 days of PICU admission. There was no evidence that 30-day mortality changed as time-to-bedside increased. A similar relationship was seen for mortality at other pre-selected time points. In children who waited longer for a team to arrive, there was limited evidence of a small increase in PICU length of stay (expected number of days increased from: 7.17 to 7.58). There is no evidence that reducing the time-to-bedside target for PCCTs will improve the survival of critically ill children. A shorter time to bedside may be associated with a small reduction in PICU length of stay.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Reaching the bedside of a critically ill child within three hours of agreeing the child requires intensive care is a key target for Paediatric Critical Care Transport teams (PCCTs) to achieve in the United Kingdom. Whilst timely access to specialist care is necessary for these children, it is unknown to what extent time taken for the PCCT to arrive at the bedside affects clinical outcome.
METHODS
Data from transports of critically ill children who were admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in England and Wales from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 were extracted from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) and linked with adult critical care data and Office for National Statistics mortality data. Logistic regression models, adjusted for pre-specified confounders, were fitted to investigate the impact of time-to-bedside on mortality within 30 days of admission and other key time points. Negative binomial models were used to investigate the impact of time-to-bedside on PICU length of stay and duration of invasive ventilation.
RESULTS
There were 9116 children transported during the study period, and 645 (7.1%) died within 30 days of PICU admission. There was no evidence that 30-day mortality changed as time-to-bedside increased. A similar relationship was seen for mortality at other pre-selected time points. In children who waited longer for a team to arrive, there was limited evidence of a small increase in PICU length of stay (expected number of days increased from: 7.17 to 7.58).
CONCLUSION
There is no evidence that reducing the time-to-bedside target for PCCTs will improve the survival of critically ill children. A shorter time to bedside may be associated with a small reduction in PICU length of stay.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32560633
doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02195-6
pii: 10.1186/s12887-020-02195-6
pmc: PMC7304220
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
301Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 15/136/45
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Health Services Research Programme
ID : 15/136/45
Pays : International
Références
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):698-704
pubmed: 20708255
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Oct;104(10):962-966
pubmed: 31540943
Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):40-8
pubmed: 19564281
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;14(5):518-24
pubmed: 23867429
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):278-85
pubmed: 12541154
Lancet. 1997 Apr 26;349(9060):1187-8
pubmed: 9130935
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;18(9):884-890
pubmed: 28723883
Anaesthesia. 2006 Dec;61(12):1135-7
pubmed: 17090231
Lancet. 1997 Apr 26;349(9060):1213-7
pubmed: 9130943
Crit Care Med. 1991 Feb;19(2):150-9
pubmed: 1796932
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Feb;97(2):145-9
pubmed: 21771765
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):280-289
pubmed: 30830016
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;16(8):711-7
pubmed: 26181297
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):302-308
pubmed: 14618230
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e028000
pubmed: 31315865
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;11(4):451-6
pubmed: 20453701
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):e34-42
pubmed: 26673843
Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):654-7
pubmed: 17283280
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):2020-7
pubmed: 23835726