Critical medical ecology and SARS-COV-2 in the urban environment: a pragmatic, dynamic approach to explaining and planning for research and practice.
Journal
Infectious diseases of poverty
ISSN: 2049-9957
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Poverty
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101606645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jun 2020
19 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
accepted:
10
06
2020
entrez:
21
6
2020
pubmed:
21
6
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Practitioners and researchers in the midst of overwhelming coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks are calling for new ways of looking at such pandemics, with an emphasis on human behavior and holistic considerations. Viral outbreaks are characterized by socio-behaviorally-oriented public health efforts aimed at reducing exposure and prevention of morbidity/mortality once infected. These efforts involve different points-of-view, generally, than do those aimed to understand the virus' natural history. Rampant spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cities clearly signals that urban areas contain conditions favorable for rapid transmission of the virus. The Critical Medical Ecology model is a multidimensional, multilevel way of viewing pandemics comprehensively, rooted simultaneously in microbiology and in anthropology, with shared priority for evolution, context, stressors, homeostasis, adaptation, and power relationships. Viewing COVID-19 with a Critical Medical Ecological lens suggests three important interpretations: 1) COVID-19 is equally - if not more - a socially-driven disease as much as a biomedical disease, 2) the present interventions available for primary prevention of transmission are social and behavioral interventions, and 3) wide variation in COVID-19 hospitalization/death rates is not expected to significantly be attributable to a more virulent and rapidly-evolving virus, but rather to differences in social and behavioral factors - and power dynamics - rather than (solely) biological and clinical factors. Cities especially are challenged due to logistics and volume of patients, and lack of access to sustaining products and services for many residents living in isolation. In the end, SARS-CoV-2 is acting upon dynamic social human beings, entangled within structures and relationships that include but extend far beyond their cells, and in fact beyond their own individual behavior. As a comprehensive way of thinking, the Critical Medical Ecology model helps identify these elements and dynamics in the context of ecological processes that create, shape, and sustain people in their multidimensional, intersecting environments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Practitioners and researchers in the midst of overwhelming coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks are calling for new ways of looking at such pandemics, with an emphasis on human behavior and holistic considerations. Viral outbreaks are characterized by socio-behaviorally-oriented public health efforts aimed at reducing exposure and prevention of morbidity/mortality once infected. These efforts involve different points-of-view, generally, than do those aimed to understand the virus' natural history. Rampant spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cities clearly signals that urban areas contain conditions favorable for rapid transmission of the virus.
MAIN TEXT
METHODS
The Critical Medical Ecology model is a multidimensional, multilevel way of viewing pandemics comprehensively, rooted simultaneously in microbiology and in anthropology, with shared priority for evolution, context, stressors, homeostasis, adaptation, and power relationships. Viewing COVID-19 with a Critical Medical Ecological lens suggests three important interpretations: 1) COVID-19 is equally - if not more - a socially-driven disease as much as a biomedical disease, 2) the present interventions available for primary prevention of transmission are social and behavioral interventions, and 3) wide variation in COVID-19 hospitalization/death rates is not expected to significantly be attributable to a more virulent and rapidly-evolving virus, but rather to differences in social and behavioral factors - and power dynamics - rather than (solely) biological and clinical factors. Cities especially are challenged due to logistics and volume of patients, and lack of access to sustaining products and services for many residents living in isolation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In the end, SARS-CoV-2 is acting upon dynamic social human beings, entangled within structures and relationships that include but extend far beyond their cells, and in fact beyond their own individual behavior. As a comprehensive way of thinking, the Critical Medical Ecology model helps identify these elements and dynamics in the context of ecological processes that create, shape, and sustain people in their multidimensional, intersecting environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32560667
doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00694-3
pii: 10.1186/s40249-020-00694-3
pmc: PMC7303934
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
71Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : K12 GM106997
Pays : United States
Références
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273
pubmed: 32015507
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1194-1196
pubmed: 32074416
J Travel Med. 2020 May 18;27(3):
pubmed: 32186711
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548
pubmed: 29792466
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e480
pubmed: 32109372
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Apr 13;:
pubmed: 32298802
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 May;32(5):744-749
pubmed: 28378546
Virus Evol. 2017 Jun 12;3(1):vex012
pubmed: 28630747
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Mar 21;19(1):41
pubmed: 32199457
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):577-582
pubmed: 32150748
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Apr 23;:
pubmed: 32335200
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5):
pubmed: 32155789
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):871-877
pubmed: 32087820
JAMA. 2020 Feb 21;:
pubmed: 32083643
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 6;:
pubmed: 32251513
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Mar 16;:1-4
pubmed: 32172715
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469
pubmed: 32235945
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):586-590
pubmed: 32125455
Am J Psychiatry. 1980 May;137(5):535-44
pubmed: 7369396