Factors influencing sedentary behaviours after stroke: findings from qualitative observations and interviews with stroke survivors and their caregivers.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 15 11 2019
accepted: 15 06 2020
entrez: 21 6 2020
pubmed: 21 6 2020
medline: 5 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Stroke survivors are more sedentary than healthy, age-matched controls, independent of functional capacity. Interventions are needed to encourage a reduction in overall sedentary time, and regular breaks in prolonged periods of sedentary behaviour. This study captured the views and experiences of stroke survivors and their caregivers related to sedentary behaviour after stroke, to inform the development of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour. Mixed-methods qualitative study. Non-participant observations were completed in two stroke services, inclusive of inpatient and community settings in the United Kingdom. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stroke survivors and their caregivers (if available) at six- or nine-months post-stroke. Underpinned by the capability, opportunity and motivation (COM-B) model of behaviour change, observational data (132 h) were analysed thematically and interview data (n = 31 stroke survivors, n = 12 caregivers) were analysed using the Framework approach. Observation participants differed in functional ability whereas stroke survivor interviewees were all ambulant. Six themes related to sedentary behaviour after stroke were generated: (1) sedentary behaviour levels and patterns after stroke; (2) the physical and social environment in the stroke service and in the home; (3) standing and movement capability after stroke; (4) emotion and motivation after stroke; (5) caregivers' influence on, and role in influencing stroke survivors' sedentary behaviour; and (6) intervening to reduce sedentary behaviour after stroke. Capability, opportunity and motivation were influenced by the impact of the stroke and caregivers' inclination to support sedentary behaviour reduction. Stroke survivors reported being more sedentary than they were pre-stroke due to impaired balance and co-ordination, increased fatigue, and reduced confidence in mobilising. Caregivers inclination to support stroke survivors to reduce sedentary behaviour depended on factors including their willingness to withdraw from the caregiver role, and their perception of whether the stroke survivor would act on their encouragement. Many stroke survivors indicate being open to reducing sedentary behaviour, with appropriate support from stroke service staff and caregivers. The findings from this study have contributed to an intervention development process using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) approach to develop strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour after stroke.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stroke survivors are more sedentary than healthy, age-matched controls, independent of functional capacity. Interventions are needed to encourage a reduction in overall sedentary time, and regular breaks in prolonged periods of sedentary behaviour. This study captured the views and experiences of stroke survivors and their caregivers related to sedentary behaviour after stroke, to inform the development of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour.
METHODS METHODS
Mixed-methods qualitative study. Non-participant observations were completed in two stroke services, inclusive of inpatient and community settings in the United Kingdom. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stroke survivors and their caregivers (if available) at six- or nine-months post-stroke. Underpinned by the capability, opportunity and motivation (COM-B) model of behaviour change, observational data (132 h) were analysed thematically and interview data (n = 31 stroke survivors, n = 12 caregivers) were analysed using the Framework approach.
RESULTS RESULTS
Observation participants differed in functional ability whereas stroke survivor interviewees were all ambulant. Six themes related to sedentary behaviour after stroke were generated: (1) sedentary behaviour levels and patterns after stroke; (2) the physical and social environment in the stroke service and in the home; (3) standing and movement capability after stroke; (4) emotion and motivation after stroke; (5) caregivers' influence on, and role in influencing stroke survivors' sedentary behaviour; and (6) intervening to reduce sedentary behaviour after stroke. Capability, opportunity and motivation were influenced by the impact of the stroke and caregivers' inclination to support sedentary behaviour reduction. Stroke survivors reported being more sedentary than they were pre-stroke due to impaired balance and co-ordination, increased fatigue, and reduced confidence in mobilising. Caregivers inclination to support stroke survivors to reduce sedentary behaviour depended on factors including their willingness to withdraw from the caregiver role, and their perception of whether the stroke survivor would act on their encouragement.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Many stroke survivors indicate being open to reducing sedentary behaviour, with appropriate support from stroke service staff and caregivers. The findings from this study have contributed to an intervention development process using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) approach to develop strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour after stroke.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32560713
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09113-6
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09113-6
pmc: PMC7305625
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

967

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0615-20019
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : RP-PG-0615-20019

Références

Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(6):315-325
pubmed: 30352864
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Dec;61(6):747-55
pubmed: 17141662
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2540-2547
pubmed: 29981314
Int J Behav Med. 2010 Dec;17(4):246-54
pubmed: 20174982
Trials. 2016 May 04;17(1):232
pubmed: 27142662
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Jul;25(5):366-374
pubmed: 29609499
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 11;12(9):e0183911
pubmed: 28892505
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Aug;45(8):1493-500
pubmed: 23475142
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015 Jul;39(3):166-71
pubmed: 26035120
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Dec;39(25):2551-2558
pubmed: 27758154
Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6
pubmed: 18252901
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Feb;23(1):36-42
pubmed: 26257146
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jan;96(1):15-23
pubmed: 25220942
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;98(9):1852-1862.e13
pubmed: 28363703
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75
pubmed: 28599680
Occup Ther Health Care. 2019 Apr;33(2):181-196
pubmed: 30890006
Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):156-70
pubmed: 12729175
Phys Ther. 1986 Oct;66(10):1530-9
pubmed: 3763704
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):273-80
pubmed: 26529471
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;99(11):2216-2221.e1
pubmed: 29750901
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1302-10
pubmed: 27475271
Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:591897
pubmed: 24772368
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:5-13
pubmed: 30170238
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Feb;35(4):315-24
pubmed: 22686259
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(5):337-51
pubmed: 18608402
Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;96(2):193-201
pubmed: 26112254
J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Jun 1;27(3):360-366
pubmed: 30160575
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Jul;26(5):327-334
pubmed: 31025908
Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3
pubmed: 3403500
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr 11;:1-9
pubmed: 30973766
BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 15;4(4):e004473
pubmed: 24736035
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Nov;31(11):1516-1528
pubmed: 28459184
Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):1005-9
pubmed: 14988574
Int J Stroke. 2017 Jul;12(5):472-479
pubmed: 28697706

Auteurs

Jennifer Hall (J)

Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK. Jennifer.Hall@bthft.nhs.uk.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK. Jennifer.Hall@bthft.nhs.uk.

Sarah Morton (S)

Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Claire F Fitzsimons (CF)

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Jessica Faye Hall (JF)

Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Rekesh Corepal (R)

Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Coralie English (C)

School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Anne Forster (A)

Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.

Rebecca Lawton (R)

School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Anita Patel (A)

Anita Patel Health Economics Consulting Ltd, London, UK.

Gillian Mead (G)

Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

David J Clarke (DJ)

Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH