A multivariate model for predicting PPGP considering postural adjustment parameters.


Journal

Musculoskeletal science & practice
ISSN: 2468-7812
Titre abrégé: Musculoskelet Sci Pract
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101692753

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 07 08 2019
revised: 25 11 2019
accepted: 10 03 2020
pubmed: 21 6 2020
medline: 30 9 2021
entrez: 21 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prospective studies have described evidence about the risk of developing pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) such as, parity, previous history of low back and pelvic girdle pain. No previous studies have prospectively associated PPGP with postural control. This study aimed to identify postural control predictors of PPGP during pregnancy. Forty-six pregnant women were surveyed throughout their pregnancy for the presence of PPGP. At baseline, participants were evaluated for muscle latencies, mediolateral centre-of-pressure (COP) displacement and velocity during single-leg lift performed with eyes open and closed. PPGP was considered if they presented with one positive clinical assessment as well as pain within the pelvic area. Eighteen (45%) of the participants developed PPGP. This group presented with PPGP around a mean 29th week (SD = 5.7), with mean pelvic pain intensity of 4 mm VAS (SD = 2) on a (0-10 cm VAS) and mean PPGP questionnaire score of 21.5 points (SD = 10.6) out of a possible 100 points with 0 indicating no functional disability. The two factors that were significantly associated with PPGP were the right and left biceps femoris (BF) muscle. For every 50 ms of difference of BF muscles latency between eyes open and closed, the risk of PPGP increases by 20% (right BF) and 30% (left BF) to develop PPGP. This study shows that BF muscle delay during single-leg lift presented at baseline was a significant predictor for the development of PPGP in late pregnancy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Prospective studies have described evidence about the risk of developing pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) such as, parity, previous history of low back and pelvic girdle pain. No previous studies have prospectively associated PPGP with postural control.
AIM
This study aimed to identify postural control predictors of PPGP during pregnancy.
METHODS
Forty-six pregnant women were surveyed throughout their pregnancy for the presence of PPGP. At baseline, participants were evaluated for muscle latencies, mediolateral centre-of-pressure (COP) displacement and velocity during single-leg lift performed with eyes open and closed. PPGP was considered if they presented with one positive clinical assessment as well as pain within the pelvic area.
RESULTS
Eighteen (45%) of the participants developed PPGP. This group presented with PPGP around a mean 29th week (SD = 5.7), with mean pelvic pain intensity of 4 mm VAS (SD = 2) on a (0-10 cm VAS) and mean PPGP questionnaire score of 21.5 points (SD = 10.6) out of a possible 100 points with 0 indicating no functional disability. The two factors that were significantly associated with PPGP were the right and left biceps femoris (BF) muscle. For every 50 ms of difference of BF muscles latency between eyes open and closed, the risk of PPGP increases by 20% (right BF) and 30% (left BF) to develop PPGP.
CONCLUSION(S)
This study shows that BF muscle delay during single-leg lift presented at baseline was a significant predictor for the development of PPGP in late pregnancy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32560861
pii: S2468-7812(19)30364-9
doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102153
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Guanine Nucleotides 0
guanosine 5'-diphosphate-3'-monophosphate 58902-76-4

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102153

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Daniela Aldabe (D)

School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. Electronic address: daniela.aldabe@otago.ac.nz.

Stephan Milosavljevic (S)

School of Physiotherapy, University of Saskatchewan, Health Sciences Building, E-Wing Suite 3400, 3rd Floor, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada. Electronic address: stephan.milosavljevic@usask.ca.

Melanie D Bussey (MD)

School of Physical Education, Sports and Exercise Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. Electronic address: melanie.bussey@otago.ac.nz.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH