Ovarian cancer symptoms, routes to diagnosis and survival - Population cohort study in the 'no screen' arm of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).
GOFF index
NICE
Ovarian cancer
Routes to diagnosis
Survival
Symptoms
UKCTOCS
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
24
11
2019
accepted:
03
05
2020
pubmed:
21
6
2020
medline:
10
4
2021
entrez:
21
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There are widespread efforts to increase symptom awareness of 'pelvic/abdominal pain, increased abdominal size/bloating, difficulty eating/feeling full and urinary frequency/urgency' in an attempt to diagnose ovarian cancer earlier. Long-term survival of women with these symptoms adjusted for known prognostic factors is yet to be determined. This study explored the association of symptoms, routes and interval to diagnosis and long-term survival in a population-based cohort of postmenopausal women diagnosed with invasive epithelial tubo-ovarian cancer (iEOC) in the 'no screen' (control) UKCTOCS arm. Of 101,299 women in the control arm, 574 were confirmed on outcome review to have iEOC between randomisation (2001-2005) and 31 December 2014. Data was extracted from medical notes and electronic records. A multivariable model was fitted for individual symptoms, time interval from symptom onset to diagnosis, route to diagnosis, speciality, morphological Type, age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis (period effect), stage, primary treatment, and residual disease. Women presenting with symptoms listed in the NICE guidelines (HR1.48, 95%CI1.16-1.89, p = 0.001) or the modified Goff Index (HR1·68, 95%CI1·32-2.13, p < 0.0001) had significantly worse survival than those who did not. Each additional presenting symptom decreased survival (HR1·20, 95%CI1·12-1·28, p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, in addition to advanced stage, increasing residual disease and inadequate primary treatment, abdominal pain and loss of appetite/feeling full were significantly associated with increased mortality. The ovarian cancer symptom indices identify postmenopausal women with a poorer prognosis. This study however cannot exclude the possibility of better outcomes in those who are aware and act on their symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32561125
pii: S0090-8258(20)31029-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.002
pmc: PMC7453382
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
316-322Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1479/A2884
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 16/46/01
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0801228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0000735
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G9901012
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/28
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest UM has stocks in Abcodia awarded to her by UCL. IJ and SJS are co-inventors of the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) which has been licensed to Abcodia Ltd. by Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Queen Mary University of London (QMUL). IJ has a financial interest in Abcodia. Ltd. as a shareholder and director and is entitled to a royalty payments via MGH and QMUL from any commercial use of the ROCA. SJS co-developed the ROCA with all rights assigned to MGH and QMUL. SJS receives personal fees from the LUNGevity Foundation and SISCAPA Assay Technologies as member of their Scientific Advisory Boards and from Abcodia as a consultant. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):943-53
pubmed: 20818904
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):945-956
pubmed: 26707054
BJOG. 2010 Apr;117(5):610-4
pubmed: 20121830
BJOG. 2016 May;123(6):1012-20
pubmed: 26032603
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Apr;187:64-9
pubmed: 25766669
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1:S92-107
pubmed: 25734382
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):433-43
pubmed: 20154587
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2705-12
pubmed: 15187051
Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):221-7
pubmed: 17154394
Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1519-25
pubmed: 22138966
BMJ. 2008 Nov 13;337:a2079
pubmed: 19008269
Cancer. 2009 Mar 15;115(6):1234-44
pubmed: 19189349
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;124(1):1-5
pubmed: 24219974
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Oct;27(8):1637-1644
pubmed: 28704327
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jan 18;104(2):114-24
pubmed: 22247022
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2016 May;35(3):230-7
pubmed: 26977579
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jan 6;112(1):207-16
pubmed: 25461805
Cancer. 1985 Dec 1;56(11):2727-32
pubmed: 4052947
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Jan;26(1):56-65
pubmed: 26509852
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Dec;21(9):1555-65
pubmed: 21912266
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2253-8
pubmed: 21537035
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 24;102(4):222-9
pubmed: 20110551
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):285-91
pubmed: 22257524
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):327-40
pubmed: 19282241
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Mar;57(536):212-9
pubmed: 17359608
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):231-6
pubmed: 19464044