Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Extra-Articular Augmentation: A Systematic Review.


Journal

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 10 01 2020
revised: 30 05 2020
accepted: 04 06 2020
pubmed: 21 6 2020
medline: 11 5 2021
entrez: 21 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of the current study is to systematically review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain rates of return to play after ACLR with extra-articular augmentation (EA). A literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated and reported on return to play after ACLR + EA; case studies and review articles were excluded. The outcomes measured focused on (1) return to play, (2) return to play at the same or higher level, and (3) timing of return to play. Qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis were performed using SPSS. Overall, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among patients undergoing primary ACLR, 82.8% to 100% were able to return to play, with 64% to 100% able to return at the same or higher level of play. All professional athletes were able to return to play, and 85.7% to 100% were able to return to the same level of preoperative play. The mean time to return was 5 to 11 months in those undergoing primary ACLR + EA. Among those undergoing revision ACLR, 50% to 88.4% were able to return to play, with 41.5% to 77.8% able to return at the same or higher level of play. None of the 5 studies that compared rate of return to play (at any level) between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone found a significant difference between them. However, among the 6 studies that compared rate of return to play at the same level between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone, 2 studies found a significantly higher rate of return to play with ACLR + EA. ACLR + EA resulted in high levels of return to play in those undergoing either primary or revision ACLR. Additionally, comparative studies of patients undergoing primary ACLR with or without EA reported similarly high rates of return to play. Level IV, systematic review of level I to IV studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32562759
pii: S0749-8063(20)30523-5
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

381-387

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Eoghan T Hurley (ET)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.. Electronic address: eoghan.hurley@nyulangone.org.

Amit K Manjunath (AK)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.

Eric J Strauss (EJ)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.

Laith M Jazrawi (LM)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.

Michael J Alaia (MJ)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH